These upcoming BTS are so depressing....I couldn't watch even for a minute....I don't think the episodes can catch us back...as said it doesn't invoke any interest......
Episode Discussions
Alia Cannes trolling was paid PR
India A vs Afghanistan A, 2nd Match, Tri Nation A Series in SL, 2026
How Alpha crushes stereotypes in 3 major ways
Anupamaa 10 Jun 2026 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Farhan Akhtar in RD Burman biopic?
Member Topic - Find your Bollywood Comedy Twin
Love after lies ParAj SS
🏏ICC Women's T20 World Cup 2026: Group 2: England W vs Sri Lanka W 🏏
MG-Black Veil-Ch-1-Pg-1-(12.6.26).
These upcoming BTS are so depressing....I couldn't watch even for a minute....I don't think the episodes can catch us back...as said it doesn't invoke any interest......
These upcoming BTS are so depressing....I couldn't watch even for a minute....I don't think the episodes can catch us back...as said it doesn't invoke any interest......
Not even abhimanyu bts ??
Nopes
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZcc-nxitDo/ua locks Dhairya in a room so that Mannat can celebrate her first anniversary 
Not sure if this makes sense, but I have a question. Do writers have the liberty to compare any character to God and use divine qualities to justify or uplift them? Abhimanyu, who was once Vikrant has been married multiple times, was about to marry twice with different women’s, and is now getting married with a psycho. Yet he is being compared to Ramji? Seriously? Lord Ram is the epitome of loyalty and devotion to Sita ji. How can such a comparison even be made? What makes it worse a wife, who is also compared to Sita ji, along with her child is praying for her husband to be surrounded by love, while at the same time their iconic chunri scene is being recreated with this new psycho chapter. It leaves a very bad taste and taints the memories attached to those moments. Writers should understand that using God’s name and image to elevate a character is not something to be taken lightly. It feels insensitive. Honestly, how does content like this get approved for telecast? Doesn’t anyone question these creative decisions before they go on air?
Not sure if this makes sense, but I have a question. Do writers have the liberty to compare any character to God and use divine qualities to justify or uplift them? Abhimanyu, who was once Vikrant has been married multiple times, was about to marry twice with different women’s, and is now getting married with a psycho. Yet he is being compared to Ramji? Seriously? Lord Ram is the epitome of loyalty and devotion to Sita ji. How can such a comparison even be made? What makes it worse a wife, who is also compared to Sita ji, along with her child is praying for her husband to be surrounded by love, while at the same time their iconic chunri scene is being recreated with this new psycho chapter. It leaves a very bad taste and taints the memories attached to those moments. Writers should understand that using God’s name and image to elevate a character is not something to be taken lightly. It feels insensitive. Honestly, how does content like this get approved for telecast? Doesn’t anyone question these creative decisions before they go on air?
Mocking our rituals & Gods are too easy as there aren't any strict rules.
Also larger audience and makers are also part of this cycle as most of them are either too lenient or are scared to raise voice.
Not sure if this makes sense, but I have a question. Do writers have the liberty to compare any character to God and use divine qualities to justify or uplift them? Abhimanyu, who was once Vikrant has been married multiple times, was about to marry twice with different women’s, and is now getting married with a psycho. Yet he is being compared to Ramji? Seriously? Lord Ram is the epitome of loyalty and devotion to Sita ji. How can such a comparison even be made? What makes it worse a wife, who is also compared to Sita ji, along with her child is praying for her husband to be surrounded by love, while at the same time their iconic chunri scene is being recreated with this new psycho chapter. It leaves a very bad taste and taints the memories attached to those moments. Writers should understand that using God’s name and image to elevate a character is not something to be taken lightly. It feels insensitive. Honestly, how does content like this get approved for telecast? Doesn’t anyone question these creative decisions before they go on air?
I believe tonight X has exploded over this issue.
Haven’t seen the episode though,
Originally posted by: Mona_HappyLife
Mocking our rituals & Gods are too easy as there aren't any strict rules.
Also larger audience and makers are also part of this cycle as most of them are either too lenient or are scared to raise voice.
Before people actively complained to IBF but sadly bcos majority of the members are from fellow channels, they don’t seem to be doing their job properly
Originally posted by: WittyKittyVixxy
Before people actively complained to IBF but sadly bcos majority of the members are from fellow channels, they don’t seem to be doing their job properly
I have had my experience complaining to the IBF during Lost. I got back a looong answer from them that justified everything they showed on screen. I was surprised at the detailed response. Never again. Not going to waste my time & energy 
Update:

(of a to be psycho). Samragi reveals that he has forgotten his life before, and now he is Manyata's childhood sweetheart. Ragebaiting to a different level:
Bhabhi, no reaction to Mannat, hugs Manyata happily, chunri falls on the new couple. Let's how much more happens.
Permission given by Leprechaun
Welcome to Chat Corner for Mannat forum We can do gupshup here
Welcome to BTS Thread of MHKPK...
Hi ya'all! This thread is for reactions on X (formerly Twitter) so that it cheers people if they are having a bad day: Will just post tweets...
WRITTEN UPDATES AND DAILY DISCUSSION THREAD NO 41 Welcome to Mannat - Har Khushi Paane Ki EDT Permission given by leprecheun
666