Anupamaa 14 Aug 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread - Page 3

Originally posted by: ShahH8er

Rishte mein jo Bhai lagte hai unko rakhi na bandhte hue, Bhatije ko Rakhi bandhna is totally justified. Btw why didn't Pakhi (eldest bua) tie a Rakhi to Ansh?

Pakhi ka Ansh ke sath relationship nahi dekha apne . Bilkul kharab hai . Isliye nahi bandhi .

Originally posted by: Rohit_Nagar

Pakhi ka Ansh ke sath relationship nahi dekha apne . Bilkul kharab hai . Isliye nahi bandhi .

Yes, their relationship is really bad considering they're staying in the same house since forever, Ansh refers to Pakhi as his Foi and she is a part of his wedding celebrations, but 'Bua-Bhatija rakhi' is where one draws the line. Absolutely

Originally posted by: ShahH8er

Yes, their relationship is really bad considering they're staying in the same house since forever, Ansh refers to Pakhi as his Foi and she is a part of his wedding celebrations, but 'Bua-Bhatija rakhi' is where one draws the line. Absolutely

First of all they are not staying in same house. Pakhi is already separated from rest of the house members . Secondly they are staying under same roof because Pakhi has no pleace and there is ishani too. The house is of Anupama so no one from either side can remove the other one

Originally posted by: Rohit_Nagar

First of all they are not staying in same house. Pakhi is already separated from rest of the house members . Secondly they are staying under same roof because Pakhi has no pleace and there is ishani too. The house is of Anupama so no one from either side can remove the other one

All this word salad just to circle back to the fact....... that they are staying in the same house. Ansh was discussing budgeting about household expenses with Pakhi and Toshu quite recently, meaning the household is jointly managed and not divided. Her and Ishani are part of every conversation and are present in all the functions so clearly there is no question of a separation. And if Pakhi and Ishani are separated from the others then why were they part of the family's Rakshabandhan where both tied rakhis to their respective brothers, as well as in the various functions of Ansh-Prarthana wedding.

Btw Pakhi was remembering her brother Samar (Ansh's father) quite fondly and getting emotional. Then why didn't she tie a rakhi to her Bhatija Ansh while Rahi and Mahi tied rakhis to their Bhatija Ansh but not their brother Tosu (they are supposed to be daughters of Anupamaa right?)

Also, since the house belongs to Anupamaa, why did she leave and start staying at the chawl in Mumbai? Abandoned her 'Anu ki Rasoi' catering service also and the women employed there, who had supported her. Do let us know if you know the reasons.

Shameless Shahs ki kya mast dhulai hui aaj

Originally posted by: Ajab.Pehchan

Shameless Shahs ki kya mast dhulai hui aaj

I hope they get pelted in the same way that the crowd furious over the roach in the food at Eshpic&Chutney had done to poor Beeji and the Simps. At least Dukhmukh-Jhuli definitely deserve it

Originally posted by: ShahH8er

All this word salad just to circle back to the fact....... that they are staying in the same house. Ansh was discussing budgeting about household expenses with Pakhi and Toshu quite recently, meaning the household is jointly managed and not divided. Her and Ishani are part of every conversation and are present in all the functions so clearly there is no question of a separation. And if Pakhi and Ishani are separated from the others then why were they part of the family's Rakshabandhan where both tied rakhis to their respective brothers, as well as in the various functions of Ansh-Prarthana wedding.

Btw Pakhi was remembering her brother Samar (Ansh's father) quite fondly and getting emotional. Then why didn't she tie a rakhi to her Bhatija Ansh while Rahi and Mahi tied rakhis to their Bhatija Ansh but not their brother Tosu (they are supposed to be daughters of Anupamaa right?)

Also, since the house belongs to Anupamaa, why did she leave and start staying at the chawl in Mumbai? Abandoned her 'Anu ki Rasoi' catering service also and the women employed there, who had supported her. Do let us know if you know the reasons.

Ek min, yeh Onupama ka ghar hain? Kab se?

Yeh ghar toh uska tab bhi nahin tha jab usne Onuj ke through neelaami se bachaya tha. Uska Shah Hauj me role permanent hain, no points for guessing.

Did she not say the house is in Hansmukh-Leela's name? Haan, she supposedly bought it, continues to fund their existence etc. But that has always been the case, isn't it? Whether she was married to Onuj Kapadia or was in Amreeka or Asa Bhawan after Mr.Shah left, back to Shah Hauj or her insurance amount, whatever.

Originally posted by: Bodhianveshika

Ek min, yeh Onupama ka ghar hain? Kab se?

Yeh ghar toh uska tab bhi nahin tha jab usne Onuj ke through neelaami se bachaya tha. Uska Shah Hauj me role permanent hain, no points for guessing.

Did she not say the house is in Hansmukh-Leela's name? Haan, she supposedly bought it, continues to fund their existence etc. But that has always been the case, isn't it? Whether she was married to Onuj Kapadia or was in Amreeka or Asa Bhawan after Mr.Shah left, back to Shah Hauj or her insurance amount, whatever.

Recently, Mrs. Anupamaa Vanraj Shah claimed that she bought back the house 'KachraKunj' from her left over winnings of Shuparshtar Shef (a farce of a competition where a talentless person like her won by shedding crocodile tears and generating sympathy)

We know that her Pati Parmeshwar Vanraj Shah had sold KachraKunj to some builder and then run away after some fraudulent dealings (probably was entering the construction industry, stole money and bailed). This was when Shameless Shahs had shifted to the temporary house opposite Niraasaa Bhawan tabela, and subsequently were kicked out from there as well upon which they took over Nirasaa Bhawan tabela, aided by their unpaid maid Pumaa and displaced the actually needy elderly folk living there.

So a few koschinns emerge. If she had enough leftover money to buy the house back, why was she doing nautanki of living in the old age home and limping around, pretending to be short on funds? Did she sell off the old age home fraudulently and get the money? Did she get the money from Ankush-Barkha from K businesses over her silence on the simps disappearance? Did she access some money he had miraculously left behind even after becoming a Bhikhari? And most importantly, did she go to the builder (yes the same one her pati parmeshwar defrauded) and say 'O Builder bhai, ye ghar nahi mera mandir hai. Mere jeene ka vajood hai ye. Mere buddhe Baa-Bapuji Bhagwaans iss umar mein kahan jaayenge. Mere bacchon ke bacchon ka kya hoga Pleeej vapas de do'. And he agreed?????

Originally posted by: ShahH8er

Recently, Mrs. Anupamaa Vanraj Shah claimed that she bought back the house 'KachraKunj' from her left over winnings of Shuparshtar Shef (a farce of a competition where a talentless person like her won by shedding crocodile tears and generating sympathy)

We know that her Pati Parmeshwar Vanraj Shah had sold KachraKunj to some builder and then run away after some fraudulent dealings (probably was entering the construction industry, stole money and bailed). This was when Shameless Shahs had shifted to the temporary house opposite Niraasaa Bhawan tabela, and subsequently were kicked out from there as well upon which they took over Nirasaa Bhawan tabela, aided by their unpaid maid Pumaa and displaced the actually needy elderly folk living there.

So a few koschinns emerge. If she had enough leftover money to buy the house back, why was she doing nautanki of living in the old age home and limping around, pretending to be short on funds? Did she sell off the old age home fraudulently and get the money? Did she get the money from Ankush-Barkha from K businesses over her silence on the simps disappearance? Did she access some money he had miraculously left behind even after becoming a Bhikhari? And most importantly, did she go to the builder (yes the same one her pati parmeshwar defrauded) and say 'O Builder bhai, ye ghar nahi mera mandir hai. Mere jeene ka vajood hai ye. Mere buddhe Baa-Bapuji Bhagwaans iss umar mein kahan jaayenge. Mere bacchon ke bacchon ka kya hoga Pleeej vapas de do'. And he agreed?????

Haan, she said she bought it back, but she bought it back in Hansmukh-Leela's name. So yeh ghar uske poojaniya Baa-Bapuji ka hn. Woh toh sirph........

ALL koschens are COMPLETELY valid. Especially, Asa Bhawan which she promised to Asa Ben before her death.

As,for the builder, he probably valued his sanity over the money and wanted to get rid of Shahs.

Suri Suri Suri 🤣