Engaging in a full-scale war could have decisively weakened Pakistan, but at what cost to India? Our economy, currently the fifth-largest globally with a nominal GDP of approximately $4.27 trillion in 2025, could have been severely impacted. Such a conflict would have undermined the significant progress we've made in recent decades. The government has consistently emphasized that the objective is to target terrorist infrastructure, not to engage in prolonged warfare. This approach was evident in Operation Sindhoor, where precision strikes were carried out against terror camps, ports, airbases, and military installations, achieving their intended goals with minimal collateral damage.
However, sustaining such operations indefinitely is not feasible. Prolonged military engagement would have diverted resources and attention from our development agenda. Unlike Pakistan, which has faced challenges in governance and economic stability, India is on a trajectory toward becoming a developed nation. Our focus remains on inclusive growth, technological advancement, and social progress.
The ceasefire agreement, brokered through U.S.-mediated talks involving President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, reflects a strategic decision to de-escalate tensions. This decision aligns with India's broader foreign policy objectives and the expertise of our leadership, including External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar.
While it's natural for us citizens to have differing opinions, it's essential to trust the government's judgment, which is informed by comprehensive intelligence and diplomatic considerations. Their efforts have consistently prioritised national interest and regional stability. Let's continue to support our leadership as they navigate these complex challenges.
1.4k