Honorable Netaji,
You're probably wondering what a strange person I am for questioning you about the principles of all our leaders and the ongoing struggle for freedom.
Your remarks during the war crisis were relevant and beneficial to us. However, why have you chosen to fight the powerful British while Mahatma Gandhi is advocating for peace and urging everyone to follow his unique form of protest?
You have consistently backed secularism, women's empowerment, and other democratic ideals. Many have called you a revolutionary, but your dedication to freedom is admirable. Your political philosophy needs to be articulated and examined from the perspectives of your spiritualistic, patriotic, secularist, democratic, and socialistic traits.
You are the first freedom fighter who predicted a left-wing revolt in the Indian National Congress that would give rise to a new political party with a clear ideology, program and plan of action for the interests of the masses, advocate the complete independence for the Indian people, advocate a federal form of government. Why do you wish to go to battle with the other major players in this struggle?
Both approaches have numerous advantages and disadvantages, I agree, but why can't we choose a less harmful freedom struggle?
With regards,
Madhuri
316