People keep saying KANK was rejected by audiences but this simply isn't true. It was the highest grossing movie overseas of 2006. It broke box office records overseas for Indian movies. Countries or theaters that never screened BW movies were screening this one for the first time, especially in the smaller European countries. There was a hype for KANK if you lived abroad that has not been felt by any movie since until Bajrangi Bhaijaan and now Pathaan and Jawan. The strength of this cast was unparalleled with 5 major stars, all at the top of their game during this period (yes even Abhishek who was riding high on his collabs with Rani), and I don't think we've seen an A-List cast like this since.
Even in India, people claim it was a flop which isn't true. It did good business in India but not as much as KKHH, K3G, and KHNH. It was never going to appeal to native Indians as much as it did to NRIs, but the film was not rejected by the masses. The biggest tell of this is if you compare it to Silsila. Silsila actually was a huge flop in India 25 years before. That film was ahead of its time and despite being Yash Chopra's fav film (almost all his movies after feature references to Silsila), it could not find an audience at all. Ironic since Jaya Bachchan was said to have said that if she stayed with Big B or not would depend on audience reactions to Silsila and what she felt they wanted. The film's flop seemed to ensure that audiences were not ready to accept the breakup of their marriage and Big B with Rekha.
In Jab Tak Hai Jaan, many people took offense to Katrina accepting her mother Neetu Singh leaving Anupham Kher for Rishi Kapoor. Watching that scene, I always felt it was Yash Chopra giving audiences the ending he always wanted and originally planned for Silsila where the lovers walk away together. Because for those who don't know, Silsila was supposed to end with Big B and Rekha together but he was forced to change the ending. Many people speculate that Jaya only agreed to do the movie if it would keep her marriage intact and not let Rekha have the happy ending.
Originally posted by: Clochette
What an interesting read...reminds me of the discussions lead at the time of the release (and after that).
1) the happy ending: It indeed had been the crux of the movie which brought the most of rejection from a a big part of the audience. It was also this ending which which ShahRukh didn't want as he (rightly) saw it as a kind of a positive outcome of a negative behaviour. He also didn't really like the the overly-bitter/cynical traits of his character but Karan wanted the movie this way...and I guess I know why...
2) Kajol: Will Kajol ever tell the real reason why she didn't want to do the movie? The moralistic take is just a pretexte.
Remember the reputation, the acting couple SRK-Kajol and their chemistry also as real life friends had at the time...can you imagine the reaction on a Maya played by Kajol and the same movie???!!!
That Karan even had Kajol in mind when writing the script...
3) the realism: No doubt about that...it certainly was a shock for the Indian audience that Karan made a movie like that (after the 3 others)...and - like in the next (MNIK) - he indulged in his own imagination and missed certain points.
I think that also was a reason for the creative distance SRK put between himself and Karan.
4) the psychology in the movie: Honestly, after having read the comments, I mostly got the feeling that many did not connect with what was really going on in the protagonists, why their marriages failed, why their friendship changed into platonic love and then physical love and then the the separation...
the praise for their partners and calling them losers show me that...
1) I don't normally side with KJo over SRK but in this case, I have to admit my taste goes more the way of KJo. I liked his character of Dev (one of my fav SRK roles) and I felt the happy ending was earned. Dev and Maya are separated for 3 years and they're absolutely alone during that time. Rhea has moved on with Arjun Rampal's Jai and Rishi has found new love as well. From the beginning of KANK, it seems Rhea and Jai are more compatible and in a longer cut of KANK, I'd have liked to have seen more screentime for him.
Tbh, what's more shocking is that Rhea and Jai never have an affair. As for Rishi, he makes peace with the fact that Maya cannot be his wife but she's still his family and that's more important to him. Those 3 years of penance may not absolve Dev and Maya entirely of the pain they caused, but I do think Rhea and Rishi were right to forgive them. In an alternate version where Rhea and Rishi had an affair and broke their broken marriages first, I do believe Dev and Maya would have forgiven them too (Dev taking a bit longer and it being more of an ego thing than actually being upset about the breakup of his marriage).
And even the ending proposal scene by Dev sorta points out the fact that this won't be a typical happy ending. He reminds Maya that he's broken both physically and figuratively and Maya herself is still broken on the inside. What he's offering to her is a broken life which may not be much for others, but it's all he has to offer and the best he can give. That's good enough for Maya and thus good enough for me.
Can you explain the bolded part? I'm curious why you feel Karan wanted the happy ending specifically.
2) Going by the extreme outrage in that thread about SRK and PC's skit, I should say Kajol should be thankful she didn't do KANK, lest people start making up rumors again that she and SRK are having an affair. I know KJo said he felt audiences would have accepted KANK with Kajol as the lead because they'd be willing to forgive SRK/Kajol in a way they couldn't forgive or condone SRK/Rani, but one could argue that a more revered pairing could have had even more of an extreme reaction. SRK/Rani could get away with such a controversial storyline in a way that SRK/Kajol couldn't precisely because they don't have the same audience expectations.
In Kajol's case, she so vehemently rejected KANK in the video that I'm also thinking her refusal was more personal in nature. Going by the innuendo of her marriage and Ajay's wandering eye, I can't help but think that Kajol could not accept this film because playing Maya would force her to face issues in her own marriage which she still isn't ready to do all these years later. I think Kajol is a better actress than she gets credit for her, but she's admitted herself that she only likes to take safe roles and doesn't challenge herself. So even without the personal issues of her own marriage, I think she would have shied away from a controversial role especially in a decade where she infrequently worked. Films like Fanaa and U, Me, Aur Hum allowed her to still expand her scope without confronting personal issues and thus were still in her comfort level.
That being said, I do find it hilarious how in the video you can tell Rani is not pleased with Kajol's words at all. I always felt Rani's strongest asset as an actress was her eyes and how much she can convey with just a glance. Some of her best scenes in KANK (the dinner scene) involve nonverbal acting on her part. In the video, from her eyes alone, you can see how ticked she looks at Kajol's claims about KANK and how she vehemently disagrees but this was a much earlier Rani who had not yet found her voice as the YRF head. She still lived in Kajol's shadow and dealt with her insecurities of not being accepted with SRK the same way he was with Kajol (something I noticed she still seems to believe to this day like in her latest KWK appearance where she tells KJo he should do a mature love story with SRK and Kajol, never considering for even a second that she could be the one to do the role). The Rani of today would not have remained silent and I think Kajol wouldn't have dared criticize KANK so openly like she did back then. You can tell now she's forced to view Rani as an equal if not superior.
3) I enjoyed both KANK and MNIK and both did gangbusters at the box office so if SRK did have creative differences with KJo, I hope he didn't hold it against him. I know they haven't worked together since then but that seems to be more from personal issues beyond their film issues and also I've heard SRK was very hurt when KJo made SOTY since he had previously promised to never make a movie without SRK. Based on that, I'm assuming SRK would have continued to work with KJo in future films had KJo not broken his promise. I imagine also that KJo's personality changes were more responsible for breaking the friendship than friction on KANK and MNIK.
4) 100% agree. Reading the comments on here have made it abundantly clear to me that most people don't really understand the character motivations or the marital states. I said earlier that I'm thankful for this because it means most people haven't been in these situations, but honestly looking at these comments again, the outright disdain for this film and utter inability to look beyond one's perspective to try and understand makes me think differently.
Now I'm convinced it's more a case where the detractors actually are personally offended because KANK is forcing them to try and look at their own marriages/relationships again and they're unwilling to do so. Like Kajol, that is not something they're ready for, so instead they lash out at the movie in order to remain in their insular bubble where they are safe from considering what could actually be. Wasn't it KANK which caused an influx of divorce amongst Desi couples because so many couples realized how true to their own lives KANK was? It's no wonder this film still gets so much dissent from some crowds, because clearly it worked a little too well in that regard. I've heard many directors say that their idea of a film isn't one that is universally loved but one that universally provokes and goads all sorts of different reactions. In that sense, KANK could be considered KJo's biggest success in terms of art.
Edited by RaniPreityAish - 1 years ago
8