Archies Review/Spoilers Discussion - Page 13

Yeah, being mean is so much easier than being fair...enjoy.

Originally posted by: Clochette

It's just the little high to collect all the negativity one meets on social media.

Zoya is such a dumb and bad director that she allowed Suhana to ruin a character...there are no minitors where her acting is watched and discussed.

But it's clear, Smiley and some others have a field day ...so be it...I have another view...so what?

No no Zoya is not dumb. Zoya Devi can never be wrong. In fact we are dumb only. All the members who are NEUTRAL who have reviewed and said she's bad plus the many other reviews and tweets. EVERYONE in the world IS DUMB, only you all are the smart ones in this world.

SUHANA KHAN IS THE BEST NEWCOMER SINCE HRITHIK ROSHAN. OMG WHAT A WOW SHE IS.

I repeat it here as it fits...

A disliked star-kid plays a dislikable character in a disliked way...quite a success...

Originally posted by: ohophelia

I did not understand a word but I just saw their lips moving. I have to watch this now. It's my solemn duty now to watch and make fun of this movie

Originally posted by: Clochette

It's just the little high to collect all the negativity one meets on social media.

Zoya is such a dumb and bad director that she allowed Suhana to ruin a character...there are no minitors where her acting is watched and discussed.

But it's clear, Smiley and some others have a field day ...so be it...I have another view...so what?

Or may be Zoya tried & couldn't extract any better

But hey, by Zoya's own admission - She selected these 'actors' because they best suited the characters.

Zoya tried her best to hide Vedang Raina but he was the only one who pops out of this otherwise drab affair.

Originally posted by: TheJourney

Or may be Zoya tried & couldn't extract any better

But hey, by Zoya's own admission - She selected these 'actors' because they best suited the characters.

First line: fat chance...

Second line: that's what I tried to explain albeit seeing it as courageous and positive.

Originally posted by: Clochette

I repeat it here as it fits...

A disliked star-kid plays a dislikable character in a disliked way...quite a success...

I am sorry, but this just seems like you are trying to put forth a convoluted argument.

One of my favorite movies - Chaahat - has a very dislikable character played by Ramya Krishnan. She played it so well that I loved the character.

Suhana is not a good actor. She cannot even open her mouth to deliver her lines properly.

So it's not a disliked star kid and what not - it's an actor who played a dislikable actor badly.

Originally posted by: 1t1svat1t1s

Zoya tried her best to hide Vedang Raina but he was the only one who pops out of this otherwise drab affair.

Opposite, she doubled his role. He was supposed to have a much smaller part because he is significantly older than the rest of the people.

Originally posted by: Clochette

First line: fat chance...

Second line: that's what I tried to explain albeit seeing it as courageous and positive.

Lol...then Suhana is a bad actor who couldn't deliver.

That in turn is Zoya's failure too for her bad judgement.

And ultimately it's a bad movie, bad direction and bad actors.

Nothing courageous or positive about it.