26 years of love taken granted.. - Page 3

Originally posted by: surabhi01

Anupama kabhi kise se beittaah hamesha ke liye nafrat nahi kar sakti

Nafrat karna anupama ki fitrat mein nahi aur yahi baat anupama ko anupama banati hai

A

Original character Jo nature aapke andar by default hai

Anupama baa ko Khichdi khud banane deti but baa ko kitchen ke latest technology ke baare mein Pata nahi tha aur anupama ke pass itna time nahi ki explain karti ki latest technology kaise use karte hain

Nahi to agar baa Khichdi bina jaane latest technology mein kitchen banati to kitchen ka satyanaash ho jata

Yahan anupama ke nature se Matlab anupama basic humanity nahi chod sakti agar dushman anupama ke saamne hungry ya thirsty hai dushman ko khaana peena kahi se nahi mil.raha hai ya bimar hai to anupama us dushman ko bhi roti sabji degi paani degi aur doctor ke pass le jaayegi

Jaroor nahi anupama use pakwaan khilayegi ya Sone ke seat pe bitha ke rakhengi.but ko Khichdi Banane deti agar woh hifi modern technology kitchen nahi Hota

Anupama ke pass itn anupama basic humanity dikhana kabhi nahi chodegi

Aur yahi baat anupama ko anupama banati

Nahi to Baa,aur anupama mein kya difference reh jaayega agar anupama bhi logon ka bura chahne lahne

Kisi ka bura sochna anupama ke nature mein nahi yahi use anupama banati hsi

Kaanta ko yeh accept karna chahiye ki uski beti ke core nature mai he anyay sehna hai toh anyay karnewalo ke ghar gayi he kyo?! Anyay karnewale karte rahege anyay, sehna ki nahi sehna yeh toh apne hath mai hai.

Anupama khud ki he doshi hai . Gadhi Kanta ko pehle apni beti ke core nature par focus karna chahiye. Badi ayi dusro ko reality check dene .

I was just going through the pages and saw your name so couldn't stop myself from reading it .

Originally posted by: kooki07

I was just going through the pages and saw your name so couldn't stop myself from reading it .

Originally posted by: Bodhianveshika

Sorry, but there is a difference between changing (in the context of complete surrender) and changing to adapt. It's a two way street. He adapted to her habits but she isn't willing to adapt to his? How is that fair?

Let us say, the situations were reversed and Anuj had a wife and kids and he was close to his ex-inlaws and was constantly involved in their lives to the extent of ignoring the new family, would we have said the same?

And anyway, people have to change and walk with the times and situations. Even still water gets stagnant.

When people are in love, it is natural to show your best side but in a marriage, you understand that the same person can be annoying may have weird characteristics and both learn a way around it or change if need be. That us how you grow. Nothing wrong with it.

I get what you're saying but that is not what I read in this post. What I read was since Anupama did not change herself for either of her husbands she deserves what she is going through and that even Vanraj was a victim of Anupama not changing attitude. And this statement is so wrong at so many levels.

Originally posted by: sillibilli

I am not here to judge anyone but aurat apne aap ko agar shaadi je baad apne pati k hissab se "change" na kare to uski galti but pati jo 26 saal se andha pyaar karte the aur tum jaisi ho waisi acchi ho bolte the wo uske change na hone par saal bhar me ham me difference aa rahe hain bole to sahi!

Hypocrisy ki bhi hadd hoti hai!

Pati ke hissab se nahi, relationship ke hissab se change hona padta hai. Anuj has changed himself to accommodate this lady and her non sense so called maayka but this shameless woman could not reciprocate that, on top of that she kept involving her ex in laws in their relationship or simply was unable to say no to them. So why blame shah's, blame this loser instead.

Originally posted by: sillibilli

I get what you're saying but that is not what I read in this post. What I read was since Anupama did not change herself for either of her husbands she deserves what she is going through and that even Vanraj was a victim of Anupama not changing attitude. And this statement is so wrong at so many levels.

People have only been saying that Anupama is a person who has established in her mind that she is the Besht. Now that is where growth stops.

The reference to Vanraj could have been a hyperbole to say she never once attempted to see if and where there was a problem.

After everything that has happened, Anupama is unable to introspect and see where the problem lies. Her cheerleaders aren't helping either. She herself does NOT want to fight for herself and plays victim.

I am fine thanks ,are you still watching the Anupama ?iwas just searching through the group members from 2 years back ,so which shows you are watching now days ? I cant find any good show at the moment just watch the the rerun of the Balika Wadhu 1.

Hi Sweet Tania how is the life going on ?