Aryan Khan Breaks His Silence On Being Arrested - Page 8

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

What ? Are you saying ive been bamboozled and led astray

Not if you are smart enough to not believe everything the media doles out😆

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

My God! Talk about misrepresenting the article! I did a quick read first, then did a slower one.

What the journo is saying there are discrepancies between what NCB Mumbai recorded and what the NCB SIT found.

SIT recorded Aryan’s statement in a Q & A format with 17 questions.

This is what he said to NCB Mumbai, under Wankhede:

Aryan said he and Achit would refer to weed as “DOKHA” and would get it from local tobacco shops. Asked if he ever did drugs, he said, “Only experimentally for recreational purposes. I have consumed marijuana in the USA and Los Angeles. But I have never consumed any drugs including marijuana in India.”

‘Got it from Ananya’

Aryan told NCB Mumbai that his childhood friend Ananya gave her weed after she found it with a close relative, who was a minor. He said she gave him the weed to dispose of. However, in her statement to NCB Mumbai on October 22, 2021, Ananya said, “...I want to explain that this is false and I am unaware why he is lying about this,” adding, “I am completely unaware why he would say something like this in reference to a 2019 chat.” Ananya said all the references to drugs in her chats with Aryan are just part of friendly banter. “I have consumed alcohol and smoked cigarettes with Aryan but never drugs and contrabands and I have never seen him consume any drugs.”

This is what he said to SIT/NCB

Aryan on Ananya to SIT

Aryan told the SIT of NCB that his chat with Ananya about “drugs” was nothing but a joke. “I jokingly called her a drug dealer but she has never given me any drugs,” he said. The SIT never questioned Ananya as the chats were not related to their case. While there are more than 35 alleged drug chats of Aryan mentioned in the charge sheet but none of those chats came under the purview of the SIT.

SIT’s clean chit

While giving clean chit to Aryan Khan, the SIT in its charge sheet said, “During the analysis of voluntary statements of Aryan and Arbaaz A Merchant, Arbaaz A Merchant in none of his statements, claimed that the 06 gm Charas recovered from his possession was meant for consumption by Aryan Khan. Aryan Khan vide his voluntary statements also, never accepted that the recovered charas was to be consumed by him.”

The SIT also said that its investigation will continue against known and unknown accused persons and a supplementary charge sheet will also be filed. Apart from Aryan, five more accused were given clean chit by the SIT raising serious questions on the investigation done by NCB Mumbai under former Zonal Director Sameer Wankhade. The NCB in its internal note to NCB director-general has said that investigating officer was “motivated” to frame Aryan.

______

That is, official statements from SIT say the ones from NCB Mumbai were not true. Internal documents (which is something media hasn't seen) claim investigating officer, ie Wankhede, was motivated to frame Aryan.

The smear here is not being done by the tabloids. It's actually being done on this tiny forum by the peeps who claim the exact opposite of what the article says. Congratulations or something! You're now as bad as the yellow press.

lol do they pay extra for the extra long essays? That made no sense at all. Better luck next time😆

I would be more worried about how much these corrupt officers of NCB get paid to release confidential information of such a high profile case.😳

Originally posted by: DetachednNumb

Again, provide VALID sources as to why the charge sheet by NCB, an investigative team, major leading newspapers are tabloids and goss but a bunch of random users on an anonymous platform with miniscule knowledge of the legal system are the be all of all things legal here? Disprove NCB and the charge sheet (communicated through an official) with valid sources of your own that is other than your convictions or your word. Otherwise, there's no point in going around in circles.

good sensible post rebutting the silly stuff. 👍🏼

Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum

lol all the essay writing and hand-wringing and conspiracy theories. 😆The nauseating obsession some people have for their stars is just bizarre. These very same actors wouldn't give these fans the time of day if they ran into them.😆

by the way, one would never see the sophisticated smart crowd fawn over these actors. It's generally people who are lower down in life that do that. One can see that at high-end parties where these actors try desperately to have other guests look at them... with no luck. But then where would certain forums be if not for the star-struck lil people?😆

I'm quite happy being a star-struck lil person when the star is SRK.😆 Do you really think calling someone lower down in life is an insult? Says more about you.😊

Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum

lol do they pay extra for the extra long essays? That made no sense at all. Better luck next time😆

😆 That was the copy-paste of the same article your buddies are twisting to mean the opposite of what it said. I added only the parts in red. Birdie made a boo-boo.

Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum

yawn.😛 You should try to be less convoluted in your logic.😆

started noticing that some of your tails come out with you. Don't they have any self-respect piggy-backing on someone who's not even that sharp?😆

Ooh. Trying to insult me and others to paper over your mistake. 😆

Ya know what they say? If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell.

You're right now yelling like hell.

But everyone can see you made a boo-boo😆. It was the article y'all thought was the absolute, positive proof against Aryan.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Ooh. Trying to insult me and others to paper over your mistake. 😆

Ya know what they say? If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell.

You're right now yelling like hell.

But everyone can see you made a boo-boo😆. It was the article y'all thought was the absolute, positive proof against Aryan.

Once you realize who is insulting you.....u should rejoice that we are not like them...take the insults as a badge of honor.....😆...I will shudder the day one of them praises us...😆

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

Once you realize who is insulting you.....u should rejoice that we are not like them...take the insults as a badge of honor.....😆...I will shudder the day one of them praises us...😆

Am cool with it, BI😊. I'm at the PopEye stage in life. I Yam What I Yam, And That's What I Yam. What people I don't care about say about me doesn't matter much.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Ooh. Trying to insult me and others to paper over your mistake. 😆

Ya know what they say? If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell.

You're right now yelling like hell.

But everyone can see you made a boo-boo😆. It was the article y'all thought was the absolute, positive proof against Aryan.

😆but you're the one yelling with all the long convoluted essays... yelling and "roaring"😆.