Writer of Priyanka Chopra's biography calls her a TOTAL FRAUD - Page 14

Originally posted by: IAmLuvBolly

The claim isn’t that the marriage isn’t valid. What is being speculated is that they are not married because they are in love and wanted to be together and have a family etcetera but rather that they married because each is getting some financial and/or professional benefit from this. That it’s basically a professional arranged marriage set up by their managers and PR.

Originally posted by: Wistfulness

I googled shouting vase to find out if this thing actually exists and here's a hilarious product description the search results displayed.

Stop paying for expensive therapy sessions and start releasing your anger naturally without frightening your co-workers with the Japanese shouting vase. The vase drowns out your screams and shouts so that you can discreetly mouth off obscenities as loud as you want.

🤣

LMFAO! 🤣 I’m sold. I’ll be buying this in a bulk so let me know if you’re interested.

Originally posted by: EXOL

come on she is unicef ambassador and she has to make such appeals. how does that makes her fake ? atleast she is not as fake as aish lmao ..

That much is true 😆😆

But the video is very odd

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

That much is true 😆😆

But the video is very odd

Can someone answer why her stage mom down right said she has no intentions of going to LA and meeting her severely premature first grandchild anytime soon? And that she is scheduled to go by the end of this year? Why Proyanka left her severely premature child and went to attend a totally elective fashion show for a week in Milan? why she and her gay faux husband were posing for paps and doing pap restaurant strolls the same weekend her severely premature baby was born? Lmfao

Originally posted by: MrsLima

Can someone answer why her stage mom down right said she has no intentions of going to LA and meeting her severely premature first grandchild anytime soon? And that she is scheduled to go by the end of this year? Why Proyanka left her severely premature child and went to attend a totally elective fashion show for a week in Milan? why she and her gay faux husband were posing for paps and doing pap restaurant strolls the same weekend her severely premature baby was born? Lmfao

1) They haven’t said anything about their baby being premature and even if it was they have all the resources to make sure the baby is looked after with the best care. I’m not sure why people care when Madhu goes to see the baby.

2) Priyanka never went to a fashion show in Milan. She went to Rome to shoot for a Bulgari campaign for 2 days. While she was away Nick was home and has lots of help with the baby I’m sure. That’s what happens when one spouse is at work, the other one takes care of the baby.

3) Baselessly calling someone gay is just weird. Nick’s brother Frankie is bisexual and no one has a problem with it so why would Nick go to such lengths like getting married and having a kid to hide that he’s gay? That’s just ridiculous, it’s been more 3 years they’ve been married and people make up such nonsense. The baby was apparently born January 15th and there’s no pictures of Nick from that day so idk what pap strolls you’re talking about.

Originally posted by: janakai

well meghan should hv thought it through. She wasnt a child.She was a 37 yr old colg educated divorced social media active actress She was too old and too educated and too experienced to pretend she had no idea what she was getting into. Class system exists everywhere.

What your saying is true but remember what Princess Diana went through and she had “grown up” in the Queen s estate and played with Andrew and Edward as children. Diana’s brother in law was the Queens secretary and she was from an aristocratic family with close ties with the Royal family and STILL she was alienated and treated so badly by the British tabloids and the royal family coz she was emerging as a threat to Charles .

So really what chance did a mixed race woman from America have ?? I agree she should have been wary but I guess love works in mysterious ways .

Harry didn’t want his wife to go through the same thing his mother suffered so he cut all ties . Man of honour .

Originally posted by: Joannna

What your saying is true but remember what Princess Diana went through and she had “grown up” in the Queen s estate and played with Andrew and Edward as children. Diana’s brother in law was the Queens secretary and she was from an aristocratic family with close ties with the Royal family and STILL she was alienated and treated so badly by the British tabloids and the royal family coz she was emerging as a threat to Charles .

So really what chance did a mixed race woman from America have ?? I agree she should have been wary but I guess love works in mysterious ways .

Harry didn’t want his wife to go through the same thing his mother suffered so he cut all ties . Man of honour .

exactly my point. Meghan should hv known better. If your late mother in law who was every inch of perfect royal daughter in law couldnt handle it, what chance do you hv ? Meghan should hv been mentally prepared for it.Wasnt it her duty to understand the family she was marrying into.? OR What would be expected out of her if she marries into such a family? Wasnt it her duty to clarify with the institution what she would be allowed to do and what not post marriage?Wasnt it her duty to build rapport and get to know her husband's family better? An intelligent woman would do all that before getting married. This wasnt her first marriage was it? You want me to appreciate or sympathise with her CLUELESSNESS?I m sorry. Cant do. Getting married into royalty is no rocket science. Even a 10 yr old understands that there are restrictions if you marry into one. At her age this is not innocence its INCOMPETENCE.

And dont compare her to diana. She is nothing like her to begin with. Also diana's problem with royal family were purely personal. Had her marriage not broken down and media war had not broke out between her and charles she would hv never gone against them. She was very much one of them.

Meghan wanted to be royalty without the restrictions and palace said no. She thought she ll be popular by marrying a prince. That didnt hapoen either. Now she is a trying to pull a "diana" on royal family. There is nothing more to it.

Originally posted by: janakai

exactly my point. Meghan should hv known better. If your late mother in law who was every inch of perfect royal daughter in law couldnt handle it, what chance do you hv ? Meghan should hv been mentally prepared for it.Wasnt it her duty to understand the family she was marrying into.? OR What would be expected out of her if she marries into such a family? Wasnt it her duty to clarify with the institution what she would be allowed to do and what not post marriage?Wasnt it her duty to build rapport and get to know her husband's family better? An intelligent woman would do all that before getting married. This wasnt her first marriage was it? You want me to appreciate or sympathise with her CLUELESSNESS?I m sorry. Cant do. Getting married into royalty is no rocket science. Even a 10 yr old understands that there are restrictions if you marry into one. At her age this is not innocence its INCOMPETENCE.

And dont compare her to diana. She is nothing like her to begin with. Also diana's problem with royal family were purely personal. Had her marriage not broken down and media war had not broke out between her and charles she would hv never gone against them. She was very much one of them.

Meghan wanted to be royalty without the restrictions and palace said no. She thought she ll be popular by marrying a prince. That didnt hapoen either. Now she is a trying to pull a "diana" on royal family. There is nothing more to it.

A few corrections.

+ The cracks in Diana's newly-found royal princess life had started to appear very early in her marriage when she realised her husband Charles was having an affair with his old buddy Camilla since before she even met him (and which continues to this day, he put a ring on it).

+ She was stuck, with very little in terms of options on the table, as well as the duty and pressure to raise the future King Of England: Big Willz, amidst all the surrounding chaos. So saying "she was just one of them" suggesting everything was fine and dandy until a tiff between husband-wife is a false narrative.

[The Royal Family like to pretend to be mostly for show, but they are deeply intertwined with and rooted within every aspect of Britain's legal/political/social structures, financial institutions, the PRESS, vast land ownership, stolen artefacts, and other wealth. Their power and influence is over-looked and poorly understood by many, even those who enjoy talking about them as a hobby, and therefore might be well-off to do a little further reading at some point.]

+ Diana was hounded, hacked, tapped, restricted and vilified, on orders of the Queen & Co, by the Press and Security Services, which lead right up to her death. They really did not give a shite about her feelings from day one, so I don't think "she would have never gone against them" - I don't even think that's the correct analysis of what happened either.

+ When it comes to Meghan, I really know hardly anything about her, and I don't really care to pay much attention to that group of people because it doesn't appeal to me, so I move on. I haven't even watched her "famous" Oprah interview. Couldn't care less. But, to suggest she should have "researched", been fully prepared for/expected the kind of ill-treatment she most definitely received is a weak statement.

She "should have known better"???

* I might be one of the few people who really don't love nor hate the girl, but we can't deny she has millions of fans. Very possibly, more than the entire royal family itself. So that did happen. And she's an actress right. She knows all about publicity. She's about that life. And I reckon she's winning too. Mission accomplished.

**Hating on that ain't gonna kick-start some kind of great-distribution-of-wealth from the Windsors, nor their friends so it's baffling why people would so passionately fabricate excuses for them, especially looking at the state of the United Kingdom today, with recent extortionate energy bill rises, inflation, rise in taxes and even worse predictions for the coming and the unforeseeable future.

Yet Prince Andrew gets millions of £££ to pay off the girl he nonced and Liz gets to reside in a newly-refurbished multi-million-pound palace in Central London funded by taxpayer's money, whilst poor people freeze to death and others skip meals to feed their kids. Yikes😉

Originally posted by: Rekha_ji

This reads like fan-fiction: hateful edition.

A few corrections.

+ The cracks in Diana's newly-found royal princess life had started to appear very early in her marriage when she realised her husband Charles was having an affair with his old buddy Camilla since before she even met him (and which continues to this day, he put a ring on it).

+ She was stuck, with very little in terms of options on the table, as well as the duty and pressure to raise the future King Of England: Big Willz, amidst all the surrounding chaos. So saying "she was just one of them" suggesting everything was fine and dandy until a tiff between husband-wife is a false narrative.

[The Royal Family like to pretend to be mostly for show, but they are deeply intertwined with and rooted within every aspect of Britain's legal/political/social structures, financial institutions, the PRESS, vast land ownership, stolen artefacts, and other wealth. Their power and influence is over-looked and poorly understood by many, even those who enjoy talking about them as a hobby, and therefore might be well-off to do a little further reading at some point.]

+ Diana was hounded, hacked, tapped, restricted and vilified, on orders of the Queen & Co, by the Press and Security Services, which lead right up to her death. They really did not give a shite about her feelings from day one, so I don't think "she would have never gone against them" - I don't even think that's the correct analysis of what happened either.

+ When it comes to Meghan, I really know hardly anything about her, and I don't really care to pay much attention to that group of people because it doesn't appeal to me, so I move on. I haven't even watched her "famous" Oprah interview. Couldn't care less. But, to suggest she should have "researched", been fully prepared for/expected the kind of ill-treatment she most definitely received is a weak statement.

She "should have known better"???

* I might be one of the few people who really don't love nor hate the girl, but we can't deny she has millions of fans. Very possibly, more than the entire royal family itself. So that did happen. And she's an actress right. She knows all about publicity. She's about that life. And I reckon she's winning too. Mission accomplished.

**Hating on that ain't gonna kick-start some kind of great-distribution-of-wealth from the Windsors, nor their friends so it's baffling why people would so passionately fabricate excuses for them, especially looking at the state of the United Kingdom today, with recent extortionate energy bill rises, inflation, rise in taxes and even worse predictions for the coming and the unforeseeable future.

Yet Prince Andrew gets millions of £££ to pay off the girl he nonced and Liz gets to reside in a newly-refurbished multi-million-pound palace in Central London funded by taxpayer's money, whilst poor people freeze to death and others skip meals to feed their kids. Yikes😉

this is not hate fiction although i m not fond of her. Especially after her 'poor me' act...but people including i were skeptical of meghan marrying into royal family since it seemed at odds with the strong independant self made feminist image she has always tried to potray. She proved all those inhibitions/apprehensions right. So i dont know how she is 'winning ' this exactly. They are literally living like non entities in usa whereas royal family is going about their own lives as if nothing happened. Nevertheless this thread was about PC being fake ,there is no need to discuss meghan. She is nothing to India anyway.