Writer of Priyanka Chopra's biography calls her a TOTAL FRAUD - Page 12

Originally posted by: FingerFetish

My wife’s turning you on is she?

Also beta calm down. You’ve been eyeing my wife out since you were a teen. 😆

LOL, stop pre-empting me. 😡

Originally posted by: BollyPC

Who said it was their PR? One Daily Mail article mentioned that bullshit

You expect normal people to keep abreast of agenda driven tabloids vs articles from legit sources? That's too much work, dude.

O teri.😲..kaisi kaisi baatein ho rahi hain....let me sprinkle some Gangajal to make everything shuddh again...

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

O teri.😲..kaisi kaisi baatein ho rahi hain....let me sprinkle some Gangajal to make everything shuddh again...

Us innocent people have no place to turn anymore 😔

Originally posted by: BollyPC

@bold… Priyanka never said that. They never gave a reason for choosing surrogacy. A publication known to lie about celebrities, especially people that have some association with Meghan Markle, mentioned that as the reason.

I don’t think off all the people associated with Meghan Markle Priyanka really is on top of any tabloids’ list to attack. If they wrote about her it’s because she’s a celebrity who had a baby. That being said I take back what I said about Priyanka and her choosing a surrogate if indeed it all came from Daily Mail. I thought it was a direct quote from her in a different publication.

I still stand by my other opinions about her.

But how can the marriage be fake?they got married legally.right?

Originally posted by: IAmLuvBolly

The marriage being fake is pure speculation probably because no one really saw her dating Nick. May or may not be true.

She said in a statement that due to their busy schedules her and Nick chose surrogacy. Reality is her age probably made it difficult for her to get pregnant but she didn’t want to say that. Instead she’s letting the world know that she can’t take a year off to get pregnant so she’s paying someone else to do it for her. All she had to do was shut up and not give an explanation and no one would have even blinked. But no, she had to make sure people knew it wasn’t about her age or other potential medical issues.

Originally posted by: jasminerahul

But how can the marriage be fake?they got married legally.right?

The claim isn’t that the marriage isn’t valid. What is being speculated is that they are not married because they are in love and wanted to be together and have a family etcetera but rather that they married because each is getting some financial and/or professional benefit from this. That it’s basically a professional arranged marriage set up by their managers and PR.

Of all the things to dislike PC for, the surrogacy should not be on the list. No matter what she reason she put out. She wasn't lecturing people to go that route if they're busy. She simply stated her reasons though I do believe she might have been lying about it since nations have surrogacy laws.

SRK affair: I think PC was out to get the queen of Bollywood tag and first tried her luck with Akshay, then SRK. He, unfortunately, says a lot of dumb things to women friends and about them and expects everyone to be like Madhuri, Juhi, Kajol, et al. who don't take it seriously. There is a clip of him with Juhi and Madhuri. If there was a clip of him with PC acting that way, shippers would've proclaimed they'd been husband and wife for saathon janam. 😆 In reality, PRIYANKA's finger was in HIS pocket, not the other way around. SHE made statements through PR, he never did.

Let's say this interp is wrong, and they did have an affair. Of course SRK was more to blame because he was and is married. But PC went after 2 married heroes on purpose because she wanted to play queen bee. She set out to destroy people's lives deliberately. That's what makes me dislike her. She's a kalank on everything feminism should stand for.

As for fakery... very few in Bollywood are not fake. Deepika, Aishwarya, Alia, Katrina, Ranveer, Ranbir, Siddhant, Siddharth... Aamir, SRK, Akshay, Ajay, Anil, Salman, Madhuri, Juhi, Aishwarya, Sridevi, Kajol, Karisma, Raveena, Manisha... Hema Malini, Jaya Bhaduri, Jeetendra, Dharmendra, Sunny Deol... going back all the way to 1930s, probably. Actually, everyone is fake, only the degree of fakedom varies. Problem with celebs like PC and Meghan Markle though is that they lecture to us regular people from their fake perches. Ugh!

Originally posted by: SmittenKitten

You expect normal people to keep abreast of agenda driven tabloids vs articles from legit sources? That's too much work, dude.

Actually, yes. That’s exactly how misinformation spreads lol. I don’t usually read just one article and start alleging PR. Least of all 💩 like the Daily Mail that generally picks on anyone non white. Soon we’ll be considering WhatsApp forwards as the global truth.🤦🏽‍♀️

If the marriage is only for financial benefit shouldn't it end within a year atleast or they wouldn't have opted having kids.

Originally posted by: IAmLuvBolly

The claim isn’t that the marriage isn’t valid. What is being speculated is that they are not married because they are in love and wanted to be together and have a family etcetera but rather that they married because each is getting some financial and/or professional benefit from this. That it’s basically a professional arranged marriage set up by their managers and PR.