Writer of Priyanka Chopra's biography calls her a TOTAL FRAUD - Page 15

Originally posted by: Rekha_ji

This reads like fan-fiction: hateful edition.

A few corrections.

+ The cracks in Diana's newly-found royal princess life had started to appear very early in her marriage when she realised her husband Charles was having an affair with his old buddy Camilla since before she even met him (and which continues to this day, he put a ring on it).

+ She was stuck, with very little in terms of options on the table, as well as the duty and pressure to raise the future King Of England: Big Willz, amidst all the surrounding chaos. So saying "she was just one of them" suggesting everything was fine and dandy until a tiff between husband-wife is a false narrative.

[The Royal Family like to pretend to be mostly for show, but they are deeply intertwined with and rooted within every aspect of Britain's legal/political/social structures, financial institutions, the PRESS, vast land ownership, stolen artefacts, and other wealth. Their power and influence is over-looked and poorly understood by many, even those who enjoy talking about them as a hobby, and therefore might be well-off to do a little further reading at some point.]

+ Diana was hounded, hacked, tapped, restricted and vilified, on orders of the Queen & Co, by the Press and Security Services, which lead right up to her death. They really did not give a shite about her feelings from day one, so I don't think "she would have never gone against them" - I don't even think that's the correct analysis of what happened either.

+ When it comes to Meghan, I really know hardly anything about her, and I don't really care to pay much attention to that group of people because it doesn't appeal to me, so I move on. I haven't even watched her "famous" Oprah interview. Couldn't care less. But, to suggest she should have "researched", been fully prepared for/expected the kind of ill-treatment she most definitely received is a weak statement.

She "should have known better"???

* I might be one of the few people who really don't love nor hate the girl, but we can't deny she has millions of fans. Very possibly, more than the entire royal family itself. So that did happen. And she's an actress right. She knows all about publicity. She's about that life. And I reckon she's winning too. Mission accomplished.

**Hating on that ain't gonna kick-start some kind of great-distribution-of-wealth from the Windsors, nor their friends so it's baffling why people would so passionately fabricate excuses for them, especially looking at the state of the United Kingdom today, with recent extortionate energy bill rises, inflation, rise in taxes and even worse predictions for the coming and the unforeseeable future.

Yet Prince Andrew gets millions of £££ to pay off the girl he nonced and Liz gets to reside in a newly-refurbished multi-million-pound palace in Central London funded by taxpayer's money, whilst poor people freeze to death and others skip meals to feed their kids. Yikes😉

And honestly we should take charles/diana saga stories with I.V saline since they are full of sh#t. People make up all kind of crap about them.

https://youtu.be/l2YzvqtX0aE

Originally posted by: BettyA1

Who are these genuine activists he's talking about?

Anyone who align with his political ideology😆

A lot of celebrity’s (across the globe) are performative activists. By this I mean their activism is largely a self-serving exercise utilised to bolster their public image. However, in almost all her public output, Priyanka seems to be entirely inauthentic, she is so blatantly and glaringly putting on an act whenever she makes an appearance.

This is the woman who claims to be pro racial equality, and yet emphasised the fact that she was bullied by *black* girls at School, and completely dismissed the #OscarSoWhite campaign.

This is the woman who claims to be a humanitarian and yet tweeted out pro war sentiments, and no ‘patriotism’ does not justify gunning for war.

This is the woman who promoted skin lightening in India and then in the US claimed to be against colourism.

She’s just very banal. Nothing of substance comes out of her mouth and the general public see that and get turned off.

Add to that the fact that she attempts to put on an intellectual persona without doing adequate research, and your left with an actress who not only comes across as lacking sincerity but also seems pretentious and unfortunately unintelligent. The most obvious example of this is her incessant and completely incorrect use of the word ‘bifurcate’ in her interview with The Guardian.