1. ALL religions were organized by men, and the rules were written to benefit men. Covering women, female mutilation, Sati, etc were started for their benefit.
2. Times have changed. We ain't living in the Middle Ages anymore.
3. Talking about Sati which was banned ages ago makes no sense in this context because Sati would be considered criminal now. But subjugation of women USING THE WOMEN'S RIGHTS argument is going on now.
4. The answer is not to use the long discarded practice of one religion to justify the current lunacy of another. It is to drag the lagging religion to 2022 with the rest of us.
5. Yeah, some women may voluntarily want to cover up. Unfortunately, we have no way of knowing if the men in charge are misusing the laws written to protect women's rights to impose their will on said women who might not be in a situation to speak up.
6. Until that fine day when we can be sure there is no coercion involved, facial coverings cannot be allowed in public spaces.
7. There is also the matter of criminal intent of men (and women) while using religion as pretext to mask their identities. When entering public space where security is considered to be of primary importance, government need not care what your faith is. Don't want to reveal your face? Fine, stay home.
Edited by HearMeRoar - 3 years ago
8