We need a track where Anu learns how to draw some bloody boundaries - Page 9

Originally posted by: shriz

agar kavya ka ghar nahi hai fir to us se ye kyu expect karte hai sab ki wo kaam kare ghar ka 😆

Yahan log bhool gaye hain..memory loss hai unhe shayad..ghar babuji ka hai par baa ne to unhe hi ghar ke bahar kar diya tha😆

Not directly but indirectly..unhe goonga gudda banne ko bol diya tha na..bola tha ghar me uska or uske bete ka raaj hoga🤢

To how dare baa ..aisa kaise kar sakti hai..ghar to babuji ke bhi naam haina🤣

Originally posted by: surabhi01

What seriously. Ab jo kanoon hai to hai

Kehte raho morcha khada karte raho ki main is ghar ki bahu hoon mera bhi adhikaar hai but kanoon thode hi emotion ke base pe chalta hai

Itv ke characters ka kitna obsession hai na..log sahi galat sab side me rakh dete hain useless points ko prove karne ke liye..

Yeh lo look like do not have answer what law say about daughter in law right so u r just laughing

But laughing karne se fact nahin badal jayega ki daughter in law apne in laws ki self acquirrd ki property pe koi right nahin hota hai

What useles point i am statmg fact but infact ur point is useless. U keep on saying daughter in law ka adhikaar yeh hota woh pata nahin kya kya

Khuch bhi

U r not undetstandinh what i am trying to say but keep putimg useless baseless point

Originally posted by: surabhi01

Yeh lo look like do not have answer what law say about daughter in law right so u r just laughing

But laughing karne se fact nahin badal jayega ki daughter in law apne in laws ki self acquirrd ki property pe koi right nahin hota hai

Dear surbhi you have no idea why am I laughing so badly..anyways let it be dear..

No point in arguing further..😆

Yes batooni na why are u laughing

U keep sayimg usless point Because of fictional character ki bahu bhi faisle le sakti hai uska bhi adhikaar hota hai

So i am saying according to indian law agar agar ghar inlaw ka hai to us pe daughter in law koi legal right nahin hota hai . Jub legal right nahin to how can daughter in law decide who can stay at or not

But with out understanding point my u keep.u just On giving usless point just becaue of fictional character

Are Kavya ki chodo. Yeh batao Anupama ne kis hak se bola? Woh toh kisi bhi angle se, door door tak iss ghar se nahin judi. Kavya is atleast indirectly associated through marriage. Even if we consider your so called argument about DIL rights, who are Anupama and Anuj to take decisions or say anything in the family’s matters?

Originally posted by: surabhi01

Yeh lo look like do not have answer what law say about daughter in law right so u r just laughing

But laughing karne se fact nahin badal jayega ki daughter in law apne in laws ki self acquirrd ki property pe koi right nahin hota hai

What useles point i am statmg fact but infact ur point is useless. U keep on saying daughter in law ka adhikaar yeh hota woh pata nahin kya kya

Khuch bhi

U r not undetstandinh what i am trying to say but keep putimg useless baseless point

Lol all the legal links and legal system becomes baseless and senseless jab bahu ki shaddi samajik vidhi Vidhan se pure samaj ke samne hui ho !

Agar koi mai ka laal property and kanoon ka dabdaba dikha kar chup karane ki koshish kare kisi bhi bahu ko toh woh uske against samaj , mahila sangathan and legal way mai ja sakti hai !

Jaha bahu ke mooh par property papers fek kar dabdaba jhada jata ho aise gharo mai toh mai aur meri women empowerment ki team he kafi hote hate jail ki chakki pisvane ke liye!

Agar ek baar Muje pata chal jaye ki India ka kaun sa yeh Mangal grah hai jo samajik vidhi Vidhan ke sath ghar mai payi gayi byahta par legalality and property papers ka dabdaba dikhate hai toh abhi se uss area ko radar mai lena start ho jaye !

Aisi regressive soch ke sath bahu ko property papers ke aadhar par dabanewale bahot ko sidha kiya hai ! India is evolving and aage bhi aise link and legal system ka misuse karne wale legal papers ka dabdaba dikhanewale ko chakki toh pelni he padti hai !😡

Originally posted by: femmefatale09

Are Kavya ki chodo. Yeh batao Anupama ne kis hak se bola? Woh toh kisi bhi angle se, door door tak iss ghar se nahin judi. Kavya is atleast indirectly associated through marriage. Even if we consider your so called argument about DIL rights, who are Anupama and Anuj to take decisions or say anything in the family’s matters?

Mai to ab sab girls ko yahi advice dene wali hun k bhai apne ghar ke papers check karlo pahle..🤣

Agar tumhare naam hai tabhi bolo Verna kabhi kuch bolne ki himmat nahi karna

Anupsma ne permission nahi di hai. Malvka pehle se hi shah ghar me jaakur baithi thi Even before anupsma say malvika yahaan reh sakti hai vah

To yahan jub malvika pehle se hi shah house mein thi to anupsma ne kya permission diya

Anupsma ne bus malvika ki baat ka jawab diya tha ki jub malvika ne poocha sabse if anupsma cant stay here so why cant I? To ise malvika ke question pe anupsma ne jawab diya yes malvika can stay yeh permission nahi hai

Waise bhi malvika shah house mein home stay karegi

Malvika koi free mein nahin reh rahi hai

Woh shah house mein home stay kar rahi hai to woh rehne khaane peena ka paisa degi

Originally posted by: surabhi01

Anupsma ne permission nahi di hai. Malvka pehle se hi shah ghar me jaakur baithi thi Even before anupsma say malvika yahaan reh sakti hai vah

To yahan jub malvika pehle se hi shah house mein thi to anupsma ne kya permission diya

Anupsma ne bus malvika ki baat ka jawab diya tha ki jub malvika ne poocha sabse if anupsma cant stay here so why cant I? To ise malvika ke question pe anupsma ne jawab diya yes malvika can stay yeh permission nahi hai

Waise bhi malvika shah house mein home stay karegi

Malvika koi free mein nahin reh rahi hai

Woh shah house mein home stay kar rahi hai to woh rehne khaane peena ka paisa degi

PaR anupama ne jawab bhi kyu diya😆

Usse question poocha kisne tha😆

Is aurat ko itna bhi nahi pata kya ke jab aapse poocha jaaye tabhi bolna chahye..it's common sense..🤢