Originally posted by: IndominusRex
Anuj and his so called love is something that I find very inappropriate and unrealistic . It is clearly a lousy attempt of trying to relate the ‘divine’ to something as cheap as plastic . Seems like they benightedly took inspiration from Krishna without caring to stop and think till which extent all this was relevant.
I hope free speech and opinion sharing isn’t hindered regardless of the fondness for some particular character, the very principle of an open forum .
Whats so inappropriate? Cannot you love a person full life
Yes its tough to get such humans in real life in 21 st century because ppl are basically selfish and think about themselves only
So ideally by now anuj should have married for 20 years and had teenager kids
But he stayed single
Nothing is divine in anuj. Thats called a good decent human who livves for his family and love and helps all around even enemies
Before people were like that they took care of younger siblings after marraige too took care of parents took care of friends or cousins in 1950s and 60s may be
Now no one does does not mean we cannot imagine such a person in todays time
Anuj definetly is not Lord Krishna inspiration that could be vanraj
Anuj is more like romeo or majnu or salim etc who would do anything for their love
I agree with you such people do not exist now but may be 100 years or 500 years back definetly such people selfless person existed and anuj is modelled on such person
Hence audience like him as such ppl do not exist in reality now
But we wish someone like him as a son brother and hubby or friend in everyones life
Yes he dated others but could not move on in life that does not make him bad or unbelievable
Some people become widow at young age and do not remarry
Some people have sibling and parents responsibility so do not marry all life
Some have failed love like anuj and do not marry
Edited by myviewprem - 3 years ago