Raghav's point on Nazar and Nazariya

Amidst all the drama that ensued today, there is one important dialogue Raghav delivered. That Sanki has a galat nazar and galat nazariya. Jo log dusro ki baaton pe jeete hai, unhe sahi aur galat ka lecture nahi dena chahiye.

He has basically summarized Sanki's overall personality in one sentence. Raghav, despite his young age, is a good judge of character and leaps and bounds wiser than Sanki.

Sanki on the other hand is a man trapped by society's perception of what a good man should look like and behave like. Therefore, he has, over time become a hypocrite because he cannot live his life as per his wishes, rather it's dictated to him by society, which he hates, but cannot oppose. He envies Raghav, and this is something I've sensed from him owing to his misplaced disgust for Raghav even before he entered Pallavi's life. His anger and his ego is greater than the wisdom he may have. He speaks of justice, rich and poor, right and wrong, but does he even know what these words mean or he just speak of it owing to his middle class syndrome which allows him to assume the worst of the rich and those in power? His ego does not even allow him to apologize to Pallavi. He thinks he owns her. Today, he wanted to use her to get back at Raghav. Mansi wanted her to come back to the house so they can use her to get back at Raghav. Then they speak of right and wrong and pretend to save her from a monster. Who is the real monster here? A father who shows up at his convenience at his daughters marital home to play another game at the expense of the daughter he claims to love? He is a whimsical man and it's sad that he is so short sighted and regressive. He swings on a flawed pendulum of right and wrong, a broken record of justice and a judgmental platform of rich and poor. Not all rich men are evil and not all poor men have golden hearts.

I feel like writing a story on Sanki. Trying to decipher his thought pattern because it's a really interesting and layered character as well.

👏

I found that striking as well, apart from apna paap ka definition apne paas hi rakho, and tum Pallavi ka baap hai isliye main izzat de raha hai.... Ekdum crisp!

The new actor did a good job too. 👏

Originally posted by: Viewpoint

Amidst all the drama that ensued today, there is one important dialogue Raghav delivered. That Sanki has a galat nazar and galat nazariya. Jo log dusro ki baaton pe jeete hai, unhe sahi aur galat ka lecture nahi dena chahiye.

He has basically summarized Sanki's overall personality in one sentence. Raghav, despite his young age, is a good judge of character and leaps and bounds wiser than Sanki.

Sanki on the other hand is a man trapped by society's perception of what a good man should look like and behave like. Therefore, he has, over time become a hypocrite because he cannot live his life as per his wishes, rather it's dictated to him by society, which he hates, but cannot oppose. He envies Raghav, and this is something I've sensed from him owing to his misplaced disgust for Raghav even before he entered Pallavi's life. His anger and his ego is greater than the wisdom he may have. He speaks of justice, rich and poor, right and wrong, but does he even know what these words mean or he just speak of it owing to his middle class syndrome which allows him to assume the worst of the rich and those in power? His ego does not even allow him to apologize to Pallavi. He thinks he owns her. Today, he wanted to use her to get back at Raghav. Mansi wanted her to come back to the house so they can use her to get back at Raghav. Then they speak of right and wrong and pretend to save her from a monster. Who is the real monster here? A father who shows up at his convenience at his daughters marital home to play another game at the expense of the daughter he claims to love? He is a whimsical man and it's sad that he is so short sighted and regressive. He swings on a flawed pendulum of right and wrong, a broken record of justice and a judgmental platform of rich and poor. Not all rich men are evil and not all poor men have golden hearts.

I feel like writing a story on Sanki. Trying to decipher his thought pattern because it's a really interesting and layered character as well.

You've penned down so much of what really stuck with me in the episode, but with words I was unable to find 🤗❤️

Raghav's moral code is far stronger than Vijay's. He may not align it with society's moral code, but he sticks to it, come hell or high water. Vijay on the other hand, is much more hypocritical.

For all his claims of goodness, a good man wouldn't be willing to sacrifice on his daughter's life and safety just because he thinks she has misstepped. That's exactly what he did, not once but twice. First on the night of the sangeet, when he was so enraged due to just the hint of a rumor that Pallavi went out with Raghav that he refused let Nikhil even go out and look for her. She was alone, in the middle of the night, and actually in real danger when Vijay was busy with his dramatics. Had Raghav not trusted his instincts that night, she could have been lying dead in a ditch somewhere and no one would even know. He did it again that night when he threw Pallavi out of the house, in the middle of a stormy night, penniless and without even a change of clothes, all based on some stories spun by a stranger. Again, anything could have happened to her. Her wellbeing means less to him than his ego and his fear of log kya kahenge? That's not characteristic of a good father, or a good man.

Raghav cares two hoots about log kya kahenge, but he does care about sticking to his moral code. He lives with too deep a guilt complex. Forget actively causing an innocent harm, he can't even let harm befall on someone innocent in front of him, which is why he completely lost his mind the night Pallavi was missing after the car crash.

If you do end up writing that story on Vijay, I'd definitely love to read it!

Originally posted by: Viewpoint

Amidst all the drama that ensued today, there is one important dialogue Raghav delivered. That Sanki has a galat nazar and galat nazariya. Jo log dusro ki baaton pe jeete hai, unhe sahi aur galat ka lecture nahi dena chahiye.

He has basically summarized Sanki's overall personality in one sentence. Raghav, despite his young age, is a good judge of character and leaps and bounds wiser than Sanki.

Sanki on the other hand is a man trapped by society's perception of what a good man should look like and behave like. Therefore, he has, over time become a hypocrite because he cannot live his life as per his wishes, rather it's dictated to him by society, which he hates, but cannot oppose. He envies Raghav, and this is something I've sensed from him owing to his misplaced disgust for Raghav even before he entered Pallavi's life. His anger and his ego is greater than the wisdom he may have. He speaks of justice, rich and poor, right and wrong, but does he even know what these words mean or he just speak of it owing to his middle class syndrome which allows him to assume the worst of the rich and those in power? His ego does not even allow him to apologize to Pallavi. He thinks he owns her. Today, he wanted to use her to get back at Raghav. Mansi wanted her to come back to the house so they can use her to get back at Raghav. Then they speak of right and wrong and pretend to save her from a monster. Who is the real monster here? A father who shows up at his convenience at his daughters marital home to play another game at the expense of the daughter he claims to love? He is a whimsical man and it's sad that he is so short sighted and regressive. He swings on a flawed pendulum of right and wrong, a broken record of justice and a judgmental platform of rich and poor. Not all rich men are evil and not all poor men have golden hearts.

I feel like writing a story on Sanki. Trying to decipher his thought pattern because it's a really interesting and layered character as well.

Arey arey, I loved this 👏👏 VD's hypocrisy is the only reason why I've always hated him more than Sulo. Sulo and Raghav actually have this common thing — they both know exactly how they are and where their powers lie. And both of them do whatever it takes to bring their opponent down. They're both devils and they own it 😈

This VD on the other hand... he's a devil who thinks himself to be a saint. In reality, he is a pathetic man chained down by his own low mentality. What was he even saying yesterday? That he wanted to save her from this 'monster'? Well, where was this protective spirit when he threw her out on the street in the middle of the night? Wasn't he leaving her to the mercy of all the monsters in the world? I could've understood if he had decided to lock her up in her room instead. That would reflect the concerns of an overly protective father, trying to keep his daughter away from the clutches of a no-good man. But nope, he decided to cut off all ties from her instead. He has a warped sense of "self-respect" which he keeps above everything else. Anyone who dares to come in its way is shown their value — he is dismissive of his brother's support, downright insulting towards his wife's counsel... and we've already seen how he was with his beloved daughter. Also, yes, he has a very twisted point of view towards the rich and their power. Like you said, I too believe it results from a deep-rooted jealousy somewhere — that they get to lead a life that isn't accessible to him — so he goes out of his way to assert how despicable their lives actually are. It's a classic "grapes are sour" mentality going on 🤔 And in dissing them, he also feels a sense of pride towards his own life — so full of principles and ethics that apparently the rich know nothing of It's where he gets his high-and-mighty attitude from.

Both VD and RR are egoistic men — but unlike VD who cares nothing about trampling his way on everyone, RR saves his attitude for those who actually deserve it. For all his talks on the poor being powerless, VD sure knows how to go around abusing his power 🤔

Sorry, I meant to come up with a constructive comment, but it turned into a rant 😆

For Vijay and infact most of the Deshmukh family except Aai--their image, how they are regarded in the society is the most important thing---how the society perceives them is their pride and this pride was repeatedly broken by Raghav Rao.

Sanki said he will set Pallavi's life again--what did he mean--make her live like a Vidhwa and a maid again? make her work hard in the shop while he enjoys in the house? make her the breadwinner of the family while everyone literally enjoys and spend her hardwork?
VD is truly a hypocrite--he says he doesn't judge another person and has modern thinking--while all his thinking is related to social difference, rich and poor, and judging anyone fastly.

the only reason he wanted to take Pallavi back to her house because of his ego--he thought after throwing her out--she will come running to him and beg for his forgiveness--and he after acting for some time will make her stay back. When that didn't happen and Pallavi married and settled at Rao Mansion and still thinking that he accepts her back--he strikes at the oppurtunity the letter provided as proof to take back home--and his ego is more injured because the girl who once didn't even raise her voice against him and followed all his orders blindly is now taking her own decisions defying his

All posts in this thread are superb 👏. This forum is full of amazing writers. ❤️

Originally posted by: ReemShah

the only reason he wanted to take Pallavi back to her house because of his ego--he thought after throwing her out--she will come running to him and beg for his forgiveness--and he after acting for some time will make her stay back. When that didn't happen and Pallavi married and settled at Rao Mansion and still thinking that he accepts her back--he strikes at the oppurtunity the letter provided as proof to take back home--and his ego is more injured because the girl who once didn't even raise her voice against him and followed all his orders blindly is now taking her own decisions defying his

Well said 🥳.

His intentions behind bringing her back to home was completely suspicious. He don't care a bit about Pallavi or her well being. He was dragging her to home to teach Raghav a lesson. He have started to realise the importance of Pallavi in Raghav's life, so what's a better way to punishm him than taking away the person he cares the most. From the look he gave RR when holding Pallavi's hand, indicates it.

If he have really cared about Pallavi, he won't drag her like this. He didn't even give a caring or loving glance in that span of time. He could have atleast apologise to her for ousting from home and for misunderstanding her. But he didn't do it, This shows how egoistic he is.

Even from initial episodes, I never felt he really cared about him. For him she was someone about whom he can boast about. A daughter who will sacrifice her desires and dreams for him. She was nothing short of a showcase material for him.

In case of Raghav, he is a egoistic person and he never rejected that claim. But also he have high moral values. From initial episodes it's so clear. He saved Pallavi from wardrobe malfunction twice even though he hated her and even protected her from goons. When she went missing, he was worried for her and didn't rest till he found her safe and sound. After marriage also, he kept his limit. Now also, he keep his distance away from her and most importantly he never made her uncomfortable.

What Pallavi said was correct. He is a person who boast about the punishment and pain he gave to others and hide his good deeds. He rarely play his games from back, even in that case he accepts that he is the master brain behind it.

Raghav always fulfilled his duty as a husband to her even though he never accepted it. He was ready to console her in her hard times, was ready to hear about her dreams and was ready to do anything for her happiness.

They both are egoistic people. Still their personalities are pole apart. And sorry for this long post. I didn't notice its length in the flow.

Originally posted by: Amnnaa

Well said 🥳.

From the look he gave RR when holding Pallavi's hand, indicates it.

If he have really cared about Pallavi, he won't drag her like this. He didn't even give a caring or loving glance in that span of time. He could have atleast apologise to her for ousting from home and for misunderstanding her. But he didn't do it, This shows how egoistic he is.

They both are egoistic people. Still their personalities are pole apart. And sorry for this long post. I didn't notice its length in the flow.

I agree with you Amnnaa---unlike other villians--VD does not know the act of buttering--he is blunt and straightforward with his intentions although he is sly. even if he buttered Pallavi a little--making an apologetic face and few fake tears---Pallavi might have melted and gone to D-house. Most likely emotional blackmail in other terms

It happens--the feelings just come out in a flow until you actually realise how long you have written.

@bold-Raghav was literally like how dare you touch her especially like that and then he looked at Pallavi to see her expressions

I love this post! As much as we tend to rant about Sanki and his actions, he is the perfect foil to Raghav, to contrast their approach to live and their thinking.

I am so happy to see that the clash of male egos is being explored this way via the sasur-damaad dynamics, that the FL's maayka isn't all nice and shareef and bechaare, whereas the ML, despite all his arrogance and rough behavior has the audience rooting for him vs a senior citizen. Why? Because it's about truth and morals that are in people's hearts and not on what's on their tongue.

Sanki isn't just jealous of Raghav, he genuinely hates him with every fiber of his being because Raghav represents a facet of life that seems to be work well despite running on a very different set of principles than Sanki's (which he thinks is the one and only way to live life). He was proud to say he'd accepted his widowed daughter-in-law as a daughter, as head of the weavers' association, I'm sure it did wonders for his image in society and made him seem more mahaan than ever before. That Raghav would take this away too, by marrying Pallavi, and creating a rift in the family, is something that Sanki could never digest. Never mind that he just had to ignore Raghav and continue living his life normally, if he really was so principled, and there wouldn't have been the subsequent breaking of ties and hearts. So now he wants to take Pallavi back, also as part of his ongoing assumption that the two did actually have an affair, and separating them would be his way of serving justice to Raghav and destroying his pride.

Losing a young son, for which he still feels guilty as he had sent him out on that fateful day, was like losing a limb and he feels emotionally handicapped to take on the world and hold his head high. The accusation of theft and the temporary time in jail destroyed his remaining self-esteem and he is happy to pin it on Raghav, whom he can never credit with being smart and entrepreneurial enough to achieve the kind of success that he has today.

Sanki's excuse to himself is that Raghav is only successful because uses underhanded ways to get what he wants and that he will be the David to Raghav's Goliath.