Character Analysis : Adi, Imlie and Malini - Page 3

I see how everyone here on the forum is trying to bash aditya and imlie over what they call a "forced marriage" and how it is illegal in the eyes of the law.

I would totally agree that forced marriages are illegal and considered a violation of human rights.

Aditya and imlie's wedding however at this point is NOT a forced marriage because of the following reasons:

1. The matter has not been brought up to the court by either aditya, imlie, or any of the witnesses.

The default of any marriage is considered to be that of free consent unless stated otherwise and brought to the attention of the court along with evidences.

2. Both aditya and imlie have accepted the marriage out of their OWN FREE WILL now without any external force.

The marriage could have been considered illegal when aditya had not accepted imlie as his wife. Post that acceptance the court has no other option but to validate the wedding since neither of the party objects to the conjugal association.

but after that marriage aditya marry malini that too front of imlie.so he does not accept that marriage before marrying malini so maybe it's illegal.

Originally posted by: Snowdrrop

but after that marriage aditya marry malini that too front of imlie.so he does not accept that marriage before marrying malini so maybe it's illegal.

Yes Adi's mariage to Malini is illegal in the eyes of law. Bigamy is not legal.

Originally posted by: Snowdrrop

but after that marriage aditya marry malini that too front of imlie.so he does not accept that marriage before marrying malini so maybe it's illegal.

I disagree.

Since the matter of forced marriage was not brought to the court before aditya and malini's marriage, the court will by default presume that aditya and imlie's marriage is valid.

This in turn will make aditya and malini's marriage illegal since bigamy is not allowed for any religion except islam. As a result the marriage will be annuled with aditya possibly facing jail time for bigamy.

That's means if they bring adilie being first married then aditya land in a jail.but I think imlie's present there put her in a trouble too. so it's best they never bring that in open.simply gets devorce from malini then marry imlie.

Originally posted by: sunshine333

1. Not going to comment on Aditya because he is truly despicable and doesn’t deserve any consideration.

1. Imlie is unrelatable and unrealistic. Period. Do you know of any grown woman who behaves like she does? Jump on vegetable carts? Overact to that extent? And her antics are more socially awkward and weird than quirky and adorable. Nobody is like that in real life. She crosses the line all the time. I can bet noone here has met a girl like Imlie in real life, because she is actually an actor playing a “character” than an actual and relatable person inspired from real life like Malini.
2. Would you have the same feelings about Imlie if Aditya was your husband? Its easy to excuse Imlie from the sidelines but imagine actually suffering because of her actions. Like objectively? Malini if anything is not reacting enough and holding back a lot.
3. What do you mean Imlie is self sacrificing!? LOL if she was self sacrificing she would never have come back to the tripathi house and left the hostel. She wouldn’t have given in to aditya’s advances and never have eyed him in the wrong way in the first place. And shes supposed to be “strong” right? So as a “strong” and “self sacrificing” woman she should have stood her ground and removed herself COMPLETELY from Aditya and Malini’s life. I am sorry but romancing Aditya behind Malini’s back is not self sacrificing.

I can exactly feel the same you have written.
couldn’t agree more.

The makers should have a look that how we audience can seee.

Originally posted by: chenjulia110

I disagree.

Since the matter of forced marriage was not brought to the court before aditya and malini's marriage, the court will by default presume that aditya and imlie's marriage is valid.

This in turn will make aditya and malini's marriage illegal since bigamy is not allowed for any religion except islam. As a result the marriage will be annuled with aditya possibly facing jail time for bigamy.

I strongly disagree to the above context.
I mean how is Aditya and Malinis marraige illegal?
What aditya did is a crime theres no other one responsible for it, what exactly illegal here is aadi and imlies marriage, a forced marriage on a gun point.
It was a situation created and justified by themselves only but as an aundience no one is dumb to see how they both not wanted to get married but to save their own life they did what they could to save themselves.
in context to Malini and Adi’s marriage, it was a fully planned marriage by their own will.
period.

Originally posted by: appy_19

I strongly disagree to the above context.
I mean how is Aditya and Malinis marraige illegal?
What aditya did is a crime theres no other one responsible for it, what exactly illegal here is aadi and imlies marriage, a forced marriage on a gun point.
It was a situation created and justified by themselves only but as an aundience no one is dumb to see how they both not wanted to get married but to save their own life they did what they could to save themselves.
in context to Malini and Adi’s marriage, it was a fully planned marriage by their own will.
period.

Ma'am i have already explained in a previous post on this same thread over why aditya and imlie's wedding was illegal initially but cannot be considered illegal or a criminal offence now. I will however reiterate my argument's jist in case you have missed it. A forced marriage is any marriage that happens without the consent of one or both of the parties involved or if the marriage happens with consent of both but one or both parties are later being forced to stay in the marriage against their own will. Here the point is that everyone even in the show acknowledged that the forced marriage that happened was illegal and the villagers could face prison time for coercion and holding the wedding at a gunpoint. But the villagers and specially satyakaam expressed his gratitude to aditya for not taking the legal route and accepting imlie as his wife. The key words here being "accepting imlie as his wife". Aditya was not being forced to accept imlie as his wife, therefore it counts as free consent in the eyes of law.

The default of any marriage is considered to be that of free consent unless one or both the parties involved raise an objection backed by evidences. Which is why aditya and imlie's marriage may be morally incorrect but not legally wrong.

This brings me to my second point that aditya and malini's marriage is invalid because aditya already had a wife from the court's point of view and bigamous marriages for anyone except the believers of islamic faith are invalid and considered illegal.

Aditya may not have accepted imlie as his wife by the time he married malini but the court cannot take that into consideration since no objection about his first marriage had been raised thereby signifying it as a normal marriage with consent of both.

Originally posted by: chenjulia110

Ma'am i have already explained in a previous post on this same thread over why aditya and imlie's wedding was illegal initially but cannot be considered illegal or a criminal offence now. I will however reiterate my argument's jist in case you have missed it. A forced marriage is any marriage that happens without the consent of one or both of the parties involved or if the marriage happens with consent of both but one or both parties are later being forced to stay in the marriage against their own will. Here the point is that everyone even in the show acknowledged that the forced marriage that happened was illegal and the villagers could face prison time for coercion and holding the wedding at a gunpoint. But the villagers and specially satyakaam expressed his gratitude to aditya for not taking the legal route and accepting imlie as his wife. The key words here being "accepting imlie as his wife". Aditya was not being forced to accept imlie as his wife, therefore it counts as free consent in the eyes of law.

The default of any marriage is considered to be that of free consent unless one or both the parties involved raise an objection backed by evidences. Which is why aditya and imlie's marriage may be morally incorrect but not legally wrong.

This brings me to my second point that aditya and malini's marriage is invalid because aditya already had a wife from the court's point of view and bigamous marriages for anyone except the believers of islamic faith are invalid and considered illegal.

Aditya may not have accepted imlie as his wife by the time he married malini but the court cannot take that into consideration since no objection about his first marriage had been raised thereby signifying it as a normal marriage with consent of both.

I don’t want to argue with you or anyone on this topic, I guess different people have different way to see the same situation.
my perspective might be different than yours in many way.
and I know we both have points to defend our statements.
Let’s hope and see what happens next in the show.

Originally posted by: appy_19

I don’t want to argue with you or anyone on this topic, I guess different people have different way to see the same situation.
my perspective might be different than yours in many way.
and I know we both have points to defend our statements.
Let’s hope and see what happens next in the show.

Ma'am you are free to hold whatever opinion you want but the court does not work on opinions. Neither mine nor yours.

For you the adilie marriage may be morally wrong and for some others adini marriage is wrong. But strictly from the point of law adilie marriage is a valid one until aditya or imlie raise an objection which they wont. This automatically makes adini marriage invalid irrespective of whether the two married with their full consent.

And currently both the marriages can be challenged since neither marriage has been consummated yet from what i know.

So speaking unbiasedly, the indian courts will presume adilie to have a normal marriage until and unless either of the two object.

You can keep supporting your own ship and argue about its moral correctness and that is none of my concern. But from a legal point of view none of your arguments sound solid to me.