Kya kehna - Page 3

Originally posted by: zehreeli.kheer

Rani's movie Mehndi.. she was tortured by her husband and in laws for dowry.. her husband also used to eye her sister and in the end tries to rape her.. The husband divorces her after humiliating her in court.. her father too is killed.. that husband was an abuser, philanderer, murderer and so much more😆

In the end Rani kills him though

Oh god !!! I mixed Raja ki aayegi baarat and this one. In Raja ki aayegi baarat, the lead rapes Rani but at last, but she has to marry him and he is forgiven at last.

But, Rahul can't be compared with him too though. Just remembered this movie hearing Mehendi's story, that's it.

Originally posted by: zehreeli.kheer

Rani's movie Mehndi.. she was tortured by her husband and in laws for dowry.. her husband also used to eye her sister and in the end tries to rape her.. The husband divorces her after humiliating her in court.. her father too is killed.. that husband was an abuser, philanderer, murderer and so much more😆

In the end Rani kills him though

Mehndi was a horrible movie just like Rani's first movie.

Originally posted by: roni_berna

You are talking about Saif? Saif ditched her so for me, he doesn't deserve anything.

I'm talking about in general life if the love is one-sided or if your partner is an MCP, it's always better to choose the one who loves you (only if he is good and your friend). It's fair for me that a person marries a person who loves her/him as he/she may not hurt you unlike your lover who is an MCP/abusive. People tend to forgive a person who they love easily just for the sake of love.

You are assuming that Priety would continue loving Saif or would never be able to love Chandrachur. One-sided love is not so bad when your partner has already experienced a heart-break. She chose Chandrachur not just for convenience but she genuinely wanted to be with him. That's what she said in the end that I couldn't say yes to you that time and I'm glad I didn't as it would appear just for convenience but now I have a choice and I choose you.

No no.. I am saying I agree that Said should not have been her choice come what may.. he was a pathetic character

No.. I think preity got over Said the moment he ditched her.. she was never in love with him after his betrayal.. but I don't think she loved Chandarchur either.. so I question her sudden choice in the end

Originally posted by: roni_berna

Mehndi was a horrible movie just like Rani's first movie.

At least she fights against the husband in this one😆 first tou is pathetic beyond belief

Originally posted by: Cheesedumplings

Oh god !!! I mixed Raja ki aayegi baarat and this one. In Raja ki aayegi baarat, the lead rapes Rani but at last, but she has to marry him and he is forgiven at last.

But, Rahul can't be compared with him too though. Just remembered this movie hearing Mehendi's story, that's it.

Both the characters were disgusting but at least In mehndi the guy dies in the end but in RKAB, damn, she marries the rapist and that's justified in the end. :(

Originally posted by: zehreeli.kheer

No no.. I am saying I agree that Said should not have been her choice come what may.. he was a pathetic character

No.. I think preity got over Said the moment he ditched her.. she was never in love with him after his betrayal.. but I don't think she loved Chandarchur either.. so I question her sudden choice in the end

Priety's character cleared the convenience part. So left is either she fell for him or gratitude. Even if she chose him because she was grateful, still it's not bad or unfair as Priety's character had gone through a lot and she would stand by him all her life. Chandrachur's character wouldn't suffer but be with a person he loves. It's just like a love-arranged marriage.

Originally posted by: roni_berna

Priety's character cleared the convenience part. So left is either she fell for him or gratitude. Even if she chose him because she was grateful, still it's not bad or unfair as Priety's character had gone through a lot and she would stand by him all her life. Chandrachur's character wouldn't suffer but be with a person he loves. It's just like a love-arranged marriage.

Perhaps.. I just felt they should have courted for a while before her saying yes to him😆

Originally posted by: Renee.Clare

Both the characters were disgusting but at least In mehndi the guy dies in the end but in RKAB, damn, she marries the rapist and that's justified in the end. :(

Haven't seen Mehendi. Thank God, haven't seen it. Yeah, Raja ki aayegi baarat was too pathetic.

Originally posted by: WexQuasExort

Just because that character is played by ur fav doesnt mean its a good character...he used to be a playboy also didnt like anjali until she became feminine...started liking tina becoz of her hot looks...said u only love once and u only get married once but gets married twice...

And thats the point i mentioned that the girl instead of liking a guy like aman loved a creep like rahul...

Copying and pasting a comment of mine that I had made in a separate Rahul butchering thread

*Sigh* The constant persecuting of Rahul’s character is such a pet peeve of mine. Anjali was a tomboy through and through. She dressed like a guy, spoke like a guy and behaved like one too. You cannot call Rahul shallow (insert new description: creep) for not being sexually attracted to her. Are people not allowed to have a type? Did it never occur to you that maybe just maybe he was not into tomboys? Is that a crime? She behaved like a guy and so he treated her like one. Anjali was put in the best friend zone (which she was happy to be in) until he made the life-changing comment ‘love is friendship’. Then suddenly he evolved into the man of her dreams.

Rahul loved Anjali as a friend. He did not perceive her in a sexual way but loved her as a companion. He harboured a deep affection and fondness towards her. When Rahul did meet Anjali again after 8 or so years, he became attracted to her. He could no longer perceive her as the Anjali that used to be his immature/childish and tomboy best friend. Instead he is now seeing her in a completely different persona. She has matured and is now much more ‘feminine’ (which seems to be in line with his preferences). Clearly that compels Rahul to start seeing Anjali as a woman and notice things about her that he never noticed before - which was hidden by the tomboy version of Anjali.

God it is so simple yet people have to make it so complicated. Since when is it a crime to have a type? We all have one so please don’t lie to yourself. Can I also add since people seem to find it funny that Rahul fell for Anjali after seeing her in a sari. Do you not realise that clothing and grooming is such a strong catalyst towards finding someone attractive. Have you girls never seen a man in a suit!?

Let me give you a scenario. You are best friends with Hrithik Roshan’s ‘Prem’ from Mein Prem Ki Dewaani Hoon. There is no power in this universe that could make me fall for that ‘clean shaven/immature/childish/flared nostril/teary eyed/colourful shirt wearing’ version of HR.

Prem is simply not my type. But if I see him again in 10 years as he steps out of a helicopter dressed in combat clothing and a stubble as ‘Kabir’ from War then HELL. TO. THE. FOOKING. YES! Y E S I am going to fall to my knees and ROAR to the heavens declaring that HE IS MINE. I’ll fight anyone against this scenario. You know it’s true 😆

What film is Mehndi? 😳