Rhea's petition 'only mentions Depression' - Page 6

Originally posted by: Sashay01

The exception is "unless made in public interest" right or wrong..her entire interview began by stating I am sharing this "in public interest" to "get rid of the stigma" around mental health.

That's enough to establish the grounds.

I'm not speaking morally please, only legally.

Sigh.

Quite intriguing that she picked this case to help people get aware of mental illnesses and not treat them as a taboo and stuff.

If this is how it starts to work, every healthcare practitioner would show up every day to disclose the medical records of their patients to the world - under the tag of - in public interest.

PS: I am not picking on you.

Originally posted by: IAdoreYou

Sigh.

Quite intriguing that she picked this case to help people get aware of mental illnesses and not treat them as a taboo and stuff.

If this is how it starts to work, every healthcare practitioner would show up every day to disclose the medical records of their patients to the world - under the tag of - in public interest.

PS: I am not picking on you.

I know what you mean. It is frustrating but in a case as high profile as this- it gets everyone to come out of the woodwork and give their 2 cents sadly.

https://everythingabouteducation.net/2020/08/02/barkha-sushant-is-not-the-opportunity-to-spread-awareness-about-mental-health-i-explain-why/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

Glad to see that I ain't alone!

I don't think when the case goes to court, it will be to prove that Sushant was not under depression and that he was murdered. This is the theory of some sections of the media and the general public.

The family itself has filed a case under abetment to suicide. So this means, they already accept that Sushant did commit suicide. (And it's too late to change it to anything else, because the body is no more and a second post-mortem cannot be conducted by an independent forensic agency to determine the cause of death.)

The case, when it ultimately goes to court, will be to prove the reason behind his suicide. Was it because he was suffering from mental health issues so severe that he ultimately ended his life and no one can be blamed for it. Or was it because he was harassed so much (presumably by Rhea and her family) that caused him to slip into depression and that ultimately led him to take his own life.

Which is why it is morally and most likely legally wrong for the therapist to have spoken about Sushant's condition in public. This is the main thing around which the entire case revolves, why he took his own life? So surely, a therapist, who will be one of the prime witness when the case comes up in a court, is not supposed to go public with a statement like this. Her credibility has already been damaged and while she might still be able to testify in court, the lawyers for Sushant's family will definitely have an upper hand in proving her an untrustworthy witness, who broke the law of patient confidentiality in public.

I'm sorry but what was the horrid narrative around mental health that she was overcome by duty???

Did anyone shame Sushant for his problems??.. The questions were raised by fans as to how quickly the police declared it to be depression without investigation.. And why that lowlife bhatt was declaring him to be schizophrenic by meeting him twice

The only, only weird comment i found came from ankita when she said ki yeh depressed ho hi nahin sakta... And then also she did not make fun of depression

Toh aisa kisne kya bol diya ki mental health ke baare mein awareness phailaane ki jaldi ho rahi thi..

Originally posted by: IAdoreYou

Sigh.

Quite intriguing that she picked this case to help people get aware of mental illnesses and not treat them as a taboo and stuff.

If this is how it starts to work, every healthcare practitioner would show up every day to disclose the medical records of their patients to the world - under the tag of - in public interest.

PS: I am not picking on you.

It is very important to have discussions regarding mental health and related stigmas in society.

HOWEVER, IT IS Bloody insensitive to attach it to any particular case without taking the consent of the parties involved. And it seems to be illegal too at some level.

The family is trying to understand what happened to their child. PLEASE WAIT for the investigation to be completed BEFORE passing judgements and acting holy. IT IS THEIR RIGHT to express their apprehensions and their right to be heard. Especially since they do not seem to be involved in either the treatment of the individual or seem to have access to the medical reports / line of treatment yet.
If it is a view point , clearly say so . DO NOT present it as if it is the last word.

As far as I am concerned. IF and I say it again IF the individual indeed had serious mental issues the last thing a loving partner would do is to just leave WITHOUT informing his sister the facts of the matter. She has every right to leave but NOT BEFORE passing on crucial information and medical records to whoever is coming in next to take charge. It may not be illegal BUT certainly inhuman.

Originally posted by: ptecvish

It is very important to have discussions regarding mental health and related stigmas in society.

HOWEVER, IT IS Bloody insensitive to attach it to any particular case without taking the consent of the parties involved. And it seems to be illegal too at some level.

The family is trying to understand what happened to their child. PLEASE WAIT for the investigation to be completed BEFORE passing judgements and acting holy. IT IS THEIR RIGHT to express their apprehensions and their right to be heard. Especially since they do not seem to be involved in either the treatment of the individual or seem to have access to the medical reports / line of treatment yet.
If it is a view point , clearly say so . DO NOT present it as if it is the last word.

As far as I am concerned. IF and I say it again IF the individual indeed had serious mental issues the last thing a loving partner would do is to just leave WITHOUT informing his sister the facts of the matter. She has every right to leave but NOT BEFORE passing on crucial information and medical records to whoever is coming in next to take charge. It may not be illegal BUT certainly inhuman.

My question is - has this psychologist who is absolutely concerned about the stigma around mental health and passionately wants to educate people about it - ever like EVER earlier taken out even a minute from her precious time to do it? I need her earlier videos where this concerned doctor is trying to make people aware about mental health issues. Because if she hasn't, I wouldn't say I am even disappointed. I am plain disgusted!

Even if we consider that okay they had some sort of fight and the patience of loving motherly girlfriend broke and she left - it's okay (it's not but well bear the thought for a moment) - how does this extremely empathetic and understanding girlfriend - again and again, over and over - makes the mentally this disturbed patient who is likely to harm himself because he is claimed to be extremely depressed and bipolar - promise not to commit suicide? Again and again? Repeatedly? Even if I were to believe that he was indeed mentally ill and he has committed suicide with no foul play involved - even then - even then - this so called girlfriend of his - was the one to plant the seeds of suicide in his mond!

Originally posted by: ZanduBaaM

Kuch ajeeb chal raha hai

I have researched first about the medicine and their side effects then taken the same even it's prescribed by my family doctor.

Now days everything available on google

Sab karte hai ye when it medicines .

Pitani is obviously a liar and is trying to spin a web of lies.