Kangana got attacked ? - Page 8

Originally posted by: grumpydwarf

The fact that Aish got blacklisted after that. When the entire industry could see what he was doing. Meanwhile he is so revered for being human says something. Explain Easha's point about the double standard. It does exist. And yes everything I have read says she was charged with a cyber crime.

he Hrithik Roshan-Kangana Ranaut fracas is finally over, it seems. Unable to come to a proper solution to the case, the cyber crime cell of the Mumbai Police has filed a final report in the case, stating that they were closing it. The cell has submitted a 'NIL' report owing to lack of any leads on the case.

https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/gossip/story/hrithik-kangana-fight-affair-details-timeline-352455-2016-11-17

No it doesn't prove Esha's point in any way.. Aish refused to file a police complain.. And Salman started being revered after an image overhaul.. during the Aish controversy, he was anything but revered.. yes.. the whole industry could see but the victim herself wdid not want to stand up (no blames to her, she must have had her reasons)<.. so Esha's point about women being called crazy when they rise is anything cannot be verified with Aish's example simply because Aish never challenged the system to begin with..

As for HR Kangana Saga, I can't even begin😆

Originally posted by: zehreeli.kheer

No it doesn't prove Esha's point in any way.. Aish refused to file a police complain.. And Salman started being revered after an image overhaul.. during the Aish controversy, he was anything but revered.. yes.. the whole industry could see but the victim herself wdid not want to stand up (no blames to her, she must have had her reasons)<.. so Esha's point about women being called crazy when they rise is anything cannot be verified with Aish's example simply because Aish never challenged the system to begin with..

As for HR Kangana Saga, I can't even begin😆

Aish got blacklisted during the controversy. Salman didnt. Refusing to file a case shouldn't have blinded the industry. Again an image overhaul with charity should undo people's memory about everything he has done. The victim didn't want to stand up for herself? So groups blacklisted her? Her point about double standards gets proven. If not a woman rising to talk about it.

And yes everything I have read says it was being handled by the cyber crimes department.

Originally posted by: grumpydwarf

Again and you have more confidence in Sushant's investigation than you do in Hrithik's. It def wasn't verdict on the spot. The hypocrisy works both ways.

Chalo at least you agree that you are showing hypocrisy.. it's a start😆

And I don't have any confidence or doubt about police investigation in any of the cases.. I wait till getting concrete stuff.. the case of HR Kangana was closed due to a technicality and lack of cooperation and power play..

Sushant's case is yet to be closed.. when the police makes its final stance known, we will see

Originally posted by: grumpydwarf

Aish got blacklisted during the controversy. Salman didnt. Refusing to file a case shouldn't have blinded the industry. Again an image overhaul with charity should undo people's memory about everything he has done. The victim didn't want to stand up for herself? So groups blacklisted her? Her point about double standards gets proven. If not a woman rising to talk about it.

And yes everything I have read says it was being handled by the cyber crimes department.

The victim chose to remain quiet so the industry chose to remain quiet.. it's not like the industry went out of the way to support Hrithik despite the fact that the victim did not stay quiet in that case..

As for the cyber department part, sure😆

Originally posted by: zehreeli.kheer

The victim chose to remain quiet so the industry chose to remain quiet.. it's not like the industry went out of the way to support Hrithik despite the fact that the victim did not stay quiet in that case..

As for the cyber department part, sure😆

The victim chose to remain quiet and the industry BLACKLISTED her. Remaining quiet would have beena different story. The entire industry maligns Kangana including Karan Johar and other big wigs.

Originally posted by: zehreeli.kheer

Chalo at least you agree that you are showing hypocrisy.. it's a start😆

And I don't have any confidence or doubt about police investigation in any of the cases.. I wait till getting concrete stuff.. the case of HR Kangana was closed due to a technicality and lack of cooperation and power play..

Sushant's case is yet to be closed.. when the police makes its final stance known, we will see

You have yet to agree it works both ways. I saw you arguing against further CBI inquiry and supporting Vidya. I don't trust the verdict of either case either. But as someone who believes in DUE PROCESS I won't treat someone as being found guilty "until they have been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." I never said the case solved anything. But it def wasn't because according to Indian law a woman can't be found guilty. They can get search warrant and hack into a destroyed computer's memory.

Originally posted by: grumpydwarf

The victim chose to remain quiet and the industry BLACKLISTED her. Remaining quiet would have beena different story. The entire industry maligns Kangana including Karan Johar and other big wigs.

She got married in the industry, didn't she?😆

Oh please😆 Kangana started getting attention from Karan and other big wigs after she started attacking them left right and center.. before that, it was mostly HR and Sumans she was up against.. The industry mostly did not take any side.. she started her verbal diarrhea first.. malign? What lies have been told on her name?😆

Originally posted by: zehreeli.kheer

She got married in the industry, didn't she?😆

Oh please😆 Kangana started getting attention from Karan and other big wigs after she started attacking them left right and center.. before that, it was mostly HR and Sumans she was up against.. The industry mostly did not take any side.. she started her verbal diarrhea first.. malign? What lies have been told on her name?😆

Yes, it was after marriage that she was no longer blacklisted. But during the controversy she got blacklisted. She is seen as some type of outcast in the industry not Hrithik. And the allegation played a huge part.

Hrithik himself had to tell people not to take sides. At least he had the much of gentlemen in him.

Hrithik, being an industry insider, has a lot of close friends in Bollywood, who came out in support of the actor. Yami Gautam, Farhan Akhtar, Twinkle Khanna, Sonam Kapoor to name a few, were very blatantly obvious on social media about who's side they're on, in this battle of the two celebrities.

https://www.cosmopolitan.in/celebrity/news/a11935/stop-taking-sides-hrithik-roshans-latest-plea-social-media

Originally posted by: grumpydwarf

You have yet to agree it works both ways. I saw you arguing against further CBI inquiry and supporting Vidya. I don't trust the verdict of either case either. But as someone who believes in DUE PROCESS I won't treat someone as being found guilty "until they have been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." I never said the case solved anything. But it def wasn't because according to Indian law a woman can't be found guilty. They can get search warrant and hack into a destroyed computer's memory.

I beg your pardon.. I am not against CBI inquiry.. who am I to be against it.. to be in favor of against the CBI inquiry is solely I'd family's prerogative.. i am just waiting for police investigation to be over because I as yet don't see any evidence of foul play being made public which would prompt me to consider CBI inquiry as necessary.. and even if I do feel that CHI inquiry is needed, I will still think it's family's right to take that decision

A woman can't be found guilty?😆 Kangana is out and about because big power play and technicality.. nothing more.. nothing less