Originally posted by: MunnaBadnamHua
aila canadian kumar ko nh bola kuch kangu rani ne 😆
Let’s make this famous. See if she shows “guts” 🤣🤣
Hey Kangana,
Dare you to bring Akshay’s name next. He has Canadian Citizenship.
Thanks.
🤣🤣
Global Alert: US–Israel's Major Military Operations on Iran🔥#2
Dhurandhar 2 Reviews with spoilers!!!!
TRAUMA HITS 18.3
Ranveer Singh the actor - Appreciation Thread!!
New promo Noinas last wish
Dhurandhar 2 - The meltdown has begun
BETI IS HURT 19.3
Cinehub - Give Ranveer National Award and Oscar
Request From Aditya Dhar
Were the rest of the movies just fake collection numbers ?
Ranveer, Aditya, cast and crew at Dhurandhar 2 premiere!!
graphicd96 - Thread for DND
🏏TATA IPL 2026 Build-up Live Updates🏏
Manish Malhotra s mother passes away.
Originally posted by: MunnaBadnamHua
aila canadian kumar ko nh bola kuch kangu rani ne 😆
Let’s make this famous. See if she shows “guts” 🤣🤣
Hey Kangana,
Dare you to bring Akshay’s name next. He has Canadian Citizenship.
Thanks.
🤣🤣
Originally posted by: cricketfan1
No matter how much you bend backwards and try to make sense of her senseless rant, including Khans in the foreigners’ list is nothing but being Islamophobic! It is what it is...she and her supporters can’t escape from it...She wont and I am sure will own it up, but her supporters also need to have some guts to accept it like it is!
I differ on this. She was alluding to fairness of skin. And it is a known fact that as we start moving towards Afghanistan and westwards, we start seeing fairer skin.
I'll be honest, I've never seen Kangana make an islamophobic comment. I remember even when Sonu Nigam had voiced against azaans from loudspeakers, she had said that she likes hearing them and so is okay with the usage.
Technically the pathetic content on Twitter was by her sister Rangoli. But I do understand that Kangana might have had a say over what was written on Twitter, although I've never seen her use derisive language herself.
In any case I don't support her religious or political views. But I largely support her interview to Arnab and the points she made there.
Originally posted by: Sailor-Moon
Gotcha. So you think it doesn't fit. Stockholm syndrome is for people who got abused or kidnapped. It's definition is: "Stockholm syndrome is a psychological response. It occurs when hostages or abuse victims bond with their captors or abusers. This psychological connection develops over the course of the days, weeks, months, or even years of captivity or abuse."
Maybe she thought colonial rule is like a form of abuse. But yeah it is definitely a very extreme word to use
It is not upto her to label people as suffering from something that she has no idea about in the first place, just like it is not upto any of us to diagnose her with a disorder.
She just comes across as someone who thinks it is cool to use whatever new terms that she comes across.
^^^^^
I know what it is, which is why I did not call it a disorder in my post either. It is, however, a label.
Besides, India's fair skin obsession can be traced back to before the British Raj.
In the same interview, she also said how Yash Chopra had supported superstars like Amitabh and SRK who were of different backgrounds and different religions.
I don't think the comment on the Khans is about religion. Either way it's hardly relevant anymore since 'Khan rule' is on the decline now anyways.
Wait why bring the khans in as an argument for obsession with fair skin...srk and Salman are not “fair”....
what she said is plain bigotry😊idhar udhar ki chiz kehke dont try to justify it.it cant be justified.Khans r popular or not,where their ancestors were before partition,whether india has fair skin obsession is irrelevant here.she said something very hateful n bigoted .bas.
I’m pretty sure there was an AND somewhere there. She said foreigners and Khans
Originally posted by: Sadhanai
In the same interview, she also said how Yash Chopra had supported superstars like Amitabh and SRK who were of different backgrounds and different religions.
I don't think the comment on the Khans is about religion. Either way it's hardly relevant anymore since 'Khan rule' is on the decline now anyways.
True and the same applies to Kangu as well...what was her last hit again? 🤔
kangana said many thing and the exact opposite too she uses people facts for her own convenience just that about nepotism she can have some points but recently some of her comments are stupid and so racist.I differ on this. She was alluding to fairness of skin. And it is a known fact that as we start moving towards Afghanistan and westwards, we start seeing fairer skin.
I'll be honest, I've never seen Kangana make an islamophobic comment. I remember even when Sonu Nigam had voiced against azaans from loudspeakers, she had said that she likes hearing them and so is okay with the usage.
Technically the pathetic content on Twitter was by her sister Rangoli. But I do understand that Kangana might have had a say over what was written on Twitter, although I've never seen her use derisive language herself.
In any case I don't support her religious or political views. But I largely support her interview to Arnab and the points she made there.
https://x.com/Tiger3_SK/status/1979188518728630308
(24) EXCLUSIVE | "ये बद्तमीज़ लोग है, गुंडे लोग है, इनको काम नहीं करना है, बस..." Abhinav Kashyap - YouTube (24) EXCLUSIVE | "Arbaaz Khan एक नंबर...
https://x.com/i/status/2031338400532541548
Shah Rukh Khan at India Summit 2026 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVQ_mclDLkh/?igsh=MW5zcjdzeDQ3b2Nu
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DUa90YuiRFQ/?igsh=MXEzN2F3bGNxZDYycQ== 😂😂
6