Did Kangana called Khans foreigners?? - Page 6

Regarding khan issue

I first of all do not understand why khan sur name can be kept by indian sub continent

because khan or KAN is sur name given to ghenghis emperor of mongol country

all of ghenghis kan's ancestors were called kan's or later on spelt as khan

so other than ghenghis kan's family others cannot truly have that sur name

kan means king of leader

but ordinary people started keeping that kan sur name to show they have affiliation to ghenghis kan or the king

thats how there are so many kan's or khan's

actually in 11th century and other few centuries only ghenghis kan's family could keep kan name

its only in last few centuries everyones keeping that sur name

SRK, salman, amir are more indian because afghan belongs to indian sub continent than mangolian

Irrespective of their sur name etc they are more indian ancestory

afghan was part of india till a few centuries back

even under mughals afghanistan was mostly under india only

so all khans are more indian sub continent than the mongolian royal sur names they own

This ancestory confusion happened to alexander the great too, many claim in asia espeially middle east that they are alexanders relatives or sikandar as they call him. Thats also a false claim actually

Originally posted by: Sailor-Moon

Stockholm syndrome means when a person forms false attachment to their kidnapper or abuser, she thinks the British abused Indians or maybe kept them hostage or something during colonial rule that's probably why she used that word

Don't tell me 😆

Originally posted by: ChinChinChooo

Don't tell me 😆

Originally posted by: tapori

You will have to do deeper digging than a simple Google search. And then you will know some of the things you stated are not true. But you won't be able to find the exact truth. That only Kat and/or her mom know. 😊

who cares? about her ancestory

shes not a great actress

salmans support and boys going ga ga over her beauty has made her a super star

or she would be side dancer in movies

Originally posted by: myviewprem

who cares? about her ancestory

shes not a great actress

salmans support and boys going ga ga over her beauty has made her a super star

or she would be side dancer in movies

At least she has the talent (looks, physique, work ethics, screen presence). I take her over substandard nepo products like the Sonas (Sonam/Sonakshi).

Originally posted by: Sailor-Moon

oh did I miss something, thought you were saying that word doesn't apply here or something like its definition

It really made no sense when she chose Stockholm Syndrome of all things, but then I forget that she's Manikarnika 😆

Originally posted by: tapori

The point she was trying to make is India's infatuation with foreign white skin. The usage of Stockholm Syndrome was probably a result of her frustration with the system (including the audience).

No matter how much we beat around the bush, we cannot escape from the fact that she has a point!

No matter how much you bend backwards and try to make sense of her senseless rant, including Khans in the foreigners’ list is nothing but being Islamophobic! It is what it is...she and her supporters can’t escape from it...She wont and I am sure will own it up, but her supporters also need to have some guts to accept it like it is!

Originally posted by: GrumpyTheCat

She had no qualms about releasing her movie in Pakistan. She likes their money but not the people.. Gotcha 👍🏻

Originally posted by: ChinChinChooo

It really made no sense when she chose Stockholm Syndrome of all things, but then I forget that she's Manikarnika 😆

Maybe she thought colonial rule is like a form of abuse. But yeah it is definitely a very extreme word to use

aila canadian kumar ko nh bola kuch kangu rani ne 😆