Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
One of things we frequently miss or misinterpret:
45 surakāryam iyaṃ kāle kariṣyati sumadhyamā
asyā hetoḥ kṣatriyāṇāṃ mahad utpatsyate bhayam
https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/mbs/mbs01155.htm
Supreme among women, this beauty of
the dark complexion will bring about the destruction of the Kshatriyas. In time, this one with
the beautiful waist will perform the objective of the gods. From her will arise terrible fear
among the Kshatriyas.
-------
This was a PLAN, not a prophecy. Panchali's adoption by Drupada was a planned move. All the surrounding stories become meaningless once we realize this.
No, she couldn't have been Yaja/Upayaja's child because it would mean Drupada just wandered around, seeking random children.
No, they couldn't have been Drupada's own because 1) Dhrishtadyumna would've been known before and 2) Kuru-Panchal alliance worked before without any adoption (Amba, Ambika, Ambalika with their Srinjaya grandfather) and the only reason to do an adoption would be to bring in another clan with stakes in the plan 3) Drupada would've had more of a reaction to everything that happened to Panchali after
Apart from kshatriya vs. kshatrya conflict, there was the Vasishta-Varuni vs Angirasa clash. Any interpretation which fails to take into account these 2 battles is either 1) assuming everything happened randomly or 2) assuming everything happened by magic.