Are ayushmann and Kartik typecast?

Huge Succes doesnt always mean versatality.

Do you think these two are typecast, if not what makes them competition to the likes of ranbir, varun, and ranveer who imo have showed way more graph in their performances.

Kartik's and ayush are doing the best that they do, Annoy the shit out of me. Why are they so annoying and talentless.

Originally posted by: vsbarry

Huge Succes doesnt always mean versatality.

Do you think these two are typecast, if not what makes them competition to the likes of ranbir, varun, and ranveer who imo have showed way more graph in their performances.

I would like to differ from you regrading Varun. He has not shown graph in his performances. The only 2 movies where his acting was bearable were October and Badlapur. That too, at times he was struggling to make an impact.

Ayushman and Kartik may not have an advantage like Varun( he is an insider) and hence don't have opportunities served to them on a silver platter. They have to make the best of what they are offered, and if they are able to create a connect with a particular genre, it's because that way their success will be cemented.

I find it hypocritical when Tiger is hailed on this forum for the same reason that Ayushman and Kartik are dissed, and then we complain about nepotism.

Originally posted by: mintyblue

I would like to differ from you regrading Varun. He has not shown graph in his performances. The only 2 movies where his acting was bearable were October and Badlapur. That too, at times he was struggling to make an impact.

Ayushman and Kartik may not have an advantage like Varun( he is an insider) and hence don't have opportunities served to them on a silver platter. They have to make the best of what they are offered, and if they are able to create a connect with a particular genre, it's because that way their success will be cemented.

I find it hypocritical when Tiger is hailed on this forum for the same reason that Ayushman and Kartik are dissed, and then we complain about nepotism.

You made a great point.

I would agree with you and say that varun is the weaker of three for sure. But he has been accepted in those roles BO wise and was able to atleast do average.

I agree completely about the whole opportunity and cementing your place in the industry esp with outsiders. They are not given opportunities to experiment b.c directors dont want to invest in them beyond what they have proven to be successful. It takes time and effort for investment and most star kids will get this only.

Ill rephrase the ?.

do ayushmann and kartik have the potential to go beyond the scope of what they are offered?

Originally posted by: vsbarry

You made a great point.

I would agree with you and say that varun is the weaker of three for sure. But he has been accepted in those roles BO wise and was able to atleast do average.

I agree completely about the whole opportunity and cementing your place in the industry esp with outsiders. They are not given opportunities to experiment b.c directors dont want to invest in them beyond what they have proven to be successful. It takes time and effort for investment and most star kids will get this only.

Ill rephrase the ?.

do ayushmann and kartik have the potential to go beyond the scope of what they are offered?

I think so, but only time will tell. Kartik's lineup in 2021 includes an action thriller and this is the first time he will be doing something which is outside his comfort zone.

Ayushman's next is Gulabo Sitabo by Shoojit Sircar, and this is a movie about the struggles of a common man. I think Shoojit Sircar always attempts something different, so this will be his litmus test.

Originally posted by: vsbarry

Huge Succes doesnt always mean versatality.

I mean which would a person rather have

Originally posted by: vsbarry

Huge Succes doesnt always mean versatality.

Do you think these two are typecast, if not what makes them competition to the likes of ranbir, varun, and ranveer who imo have showed way more graph in their performances.

AK and KA 😂 have given RoI the likes of which Ranbir, Ranveer, and Varun haven't. Yes, the latters' movies have done crores of business but only after near equal amounts of investment.

Re: versatility. Ranbir hasn't seen success beyond his manchild role. I like Ranveer more so am sorry to say he is also stuck in the tapori (that's not the exact word but close enough) role except here and there like a DDD or a GB. Varun is a mediocre actor with mediocre success. AK and KA have raced beyond him, so comparisons to VD are pointless.

Originally posted by: MahanalayakKarn

I like Ranveer more so am sorry to say he is also stuck in the tapori (that's not the exact word but close enough) role except here and there like a DDD or a GB.

Your saying Ranveer was same in Padmavat, Simba and Gully Boy ?

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

Your saying Ranveer was same in Padmavat, Simba and Gully Boy ?

I did mention GB was diff. Simba and Padmavat, the plots were clearly diff, but it was the same character who showr up.

Originally posted by: MahanalayakKarn

but it was the same character who showr up.

Something like that can be said about alot of people