Is Ranbir Better Than Hrithik? - Page 2

Yes, I think HR is better than Ranbir and not due to Ranbir’s lack of diversity. I don’t mind a strong actor staying in their comfort zone as long as they blow me away and are the best in their “niche”. Not every actor needs to be good at dancing, etc. Ranbir is just not a great actor IMO. He is good/average but he has yet to blow me away or make me think about his performance after watching his movie. His eyes DO NOT EMOTE, they are dead. He doesn’t take risks when acting (again, not talking about movie choices) and completely immerse himself in a character and let loose. There is always so much control, measure and the performance is always polished. That’s not what great acting is IMO. Acting should be raw and sometimes uncomfortable to watch and experience. To be a great actor you need to be a highly empathetic and emotional person - the greatest actors are “special” individuals. What works for Ranbir is the fact that he doesn’t overreact (which people in BW feel = good acting), has a confident/stable presence on screen and his surname.

I am personally not a fan of bulky, pseudo MJ Hrithik. I hate when his movies make him look Mr Muscle or MJ. He is a natural, he is very enjoyable to watch and doesn’t need this. The perfect example is his role in JA. He was stellar...no dance, no histrionics, etc.

Originally posted by: Sorein

Yes, I think HR is better than Ranbir and not due to Ranbir’s lack of diversity. I don’t mind a strong actor staying in their comfort zone as long as they blow me away and are the best in their “niche”. Not every actor needs to be good at dancing, etc. Ranbir is just not a great actor IMO. He is good/average but he has yet to blow me away or make me think about his performance after watching his movie. His eyes DO NOT EMOTE, they are dead. He doesn’t take risks when acting (again, not talking about movie choices) and completely immerse himself in a character and let loose. There is always so much control, measure and the performance is always polished. That’s not what great acting is IMO. Acting should be raw and sometimes uncomfortable to watch and experience. To be a great actor you need to be a highly empathetic and emotional person - the greatest actors are “special” individuals. What works for Ranbir is the fact that he doesn’t overreact (which people in BW feel = good acting), has a

Completetly agree,

I personally get bored of watching Ranbir. I mean he's a pale scrawny Kapoor whose going to be overweight pretty soon. I just find his face to be annoying and I just cant appreciate his acting because he just seems so weird and artificial.

His off-screen antics also cloud my judgemental, cant keep his pichkari in his pants because of overactive bramastra.

HR is far better actor than RK, anyday.

Ranbir can only play roles of ppl from upper class and not gaon walas like Hrithik

I'm with you on this one SH I pick Hrithik too.

Kangana Toot Gaye......🤣🤣

As a complete package Hrithik definitely trumps Ranbir but if we consider only the acting abilities then Ranbir it is for me...The guy can act circles around Hrithik!

I like ranbir and Hrithik both.

No one can do koi mil gaya Better that Hrithik and barfi better than Ranbir.

They both knows their craft very well. So they are both better than each other in their zone.

Originally posted by: cricketfan1

the guy can act circles around Hrithik!

🤣 omg....I dont think I have ever laughed at any comment as much as this one. Matlab kuch bhi

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan

🤣 omg....I dont think I have ever laughed at any comment as much as this one.

Pleasure is mine! 😎

Ranbir still has long way to go