Ranbir's acting

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

Ajeebdastaan28

@Ajeebdastaan28

Explorer

Posted: 7 years ago

#11

Despite Natural Actor and Every thing never liked Ranbir as actor Their is Some thing missing in Him he is natural Actorcan act anything easily according his coactress and All but for Me it never touched i Like actor who work Hard on his act Like amitabh bachan said he rehearse alot for his movies despite he is working from 50 years this kinds Hard work i like now I see these Things in Ranveer he Must be not Best or Natural But he does Same what amitabh bachhan doing working on act and roles for getting things rite and then public Praise soem thing Else according to Me

Quote

Shaitaan Haiwan

@Shaitan-Haiwan

Stunner

+ 8

Posted: 7 years ago

#12

Ranbir only excelled in roles where hes a man-child or roles where we have to feel sorry for him.

Ranveer's body of work is much more versatile. Cant imagine Ranbir doing BBB or even A Simba or GB.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

1098676

Suspended

Posted: 7 years ago

#13

All roles of Ranveer are tailor made of him only. He kinda plays himself in every film with all the OTT gimmicks he does in real life. So this rant of Ranbir can't play so and so role of Ranveer, I can't imagine him doing that blah blah doesn't hold much value.

Quote

liberiangirl

@liberiangirl

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 7 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: Pehchaan.Kaun
I am sorry but moving around the screen with a deadpan face and big eyes is neither acting nor emoting. He is good in certain type of roles though i.e. manchild ones. I like him in WUS and YJHD.

If this is a comparison topic, then let me say please, Veera is the most versatile actor and finally being recognized for that. Ranbir is over-hyped inside the industry because he is a nepotism product. But any neutral audience can see that it is ONLY Ranveer who can pull off anything on screen, a street boy loafer (Gunday), a street boy with integrity in character (GB), an intense complex character (Lootera), an urban hunk (DDD), an aamchi Mumbai/NI guy (BBB), a historical (BM or Padmavat), a full on masala entertainer (SIMMBA). None except him from Post-Khan genre has this versatility in his filmography.

Also, it's getting tiresome watching him 'find himself' in all his movies. Boring as hell!

Edited by liberiangirl - 7 years ago

Quote

pallavi25

@pallavi25

Inactive

+ 5

Posted: 7 years ago

#15

Of course Ranbir is a brilliant actor and hes proved this with 10 films already, he doesnt have anymore to prove, others are still way behind him to catch up with him. Let them have a filmography equal to him first then we will talk

Barrfi, Rajneeti, WUS, Rockstar, Sanju, Jagga Jasoos, Rocket Singh and Tamasha- he was amazing in all of these movies

And people who think he plays same kind of roles, LOL, is Barrfi role same as Rajneeti same as Sanju same as Rockstar? Kuchh bhi ...😆

People here make such sweeping statements all the time without any basis or proof

Quote

OG Evil Spawn

@Maroonporsche

Achiever

+ 11

Posted: 7 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: liberiangirl

+1

Also, it's getting tiresome watching him 'find himself' in all his movies. Boring as hell!

He's just finding himself for years and years and years. But found nothing 😆😆

Quote

448368

Suspended

Posted: 7 years ago

#17

TM is a deepika fan, what more can be expected. One more bashing thread and I'm reporting.

Quote

SASSZS

@SASSZS

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 7 years ago

#18

With those drunk-lifeless eyes and one note acting, the limit shows when he tries something out of his comfort zone. But I guess he appeals to some who still stick to him. Won't question that. To me he is like the male Kajol. I'll probably never understand the hype for both.