Padmavati : Reply to Devdutt Patnaik

Sutapasima thumbnail

Love Legion

Posted: 7 years ago
#1
Sharing from the wall of a friend... I am in total agreement with the lady whose post this is.

RANI PADMAVATI
A Woman Tears into Devdutt Pattanaik for his Shameful Commentary about Rani Padmini
By
Sanghamitra Purohit -
November 18, 2017

Devdutt Pattanaik Ji, let me begin by admitting I haven't read the great many books that you have written. So I will refrain from commenting on them. I have, however read your tweets and the recent ones about Rani Padmini of Chittorgarh have compelled me to write this letter to you.
You seem to be disgusted by the fact that the people of Mewar and a large population of India regards Rani Padmini as a brave woman worthy of immense respect because she chose self-immolation over dishonor. This kind of reverence to a queen who lived 700 years ago for an allegedly regressive and patriarchal decision and "celebration of her sacrifice seem to have outraged your liberal, progressive ideology.

Devdutt Pattanaik Ji, please allow me to demystify some myths (pun intended) for you.

Rani Padmini was the wife of Maharawal Ratan Singh who was the ruler of Mewar when Alauddin Khilji decided to conquer the Chittorgarh fort. Now, romanticism and popular culture has made us believe that Khilji attacked Chittorgarh because he wanted to "have Rani Padmini. See Devdutt Pattanaik Ji, this is where all the confusion starts. Because your disillusionment about why Rani Padmini didn't "choose life also roots from this confusion. Because this idea that Khilji wanted to " Rani Padmini gives rise to the notions that why then she didn't just let him "have her and then continued to "Survive and thrive (your words, not mine)?

Unfortunately, Devdutt Pattanaik Ji, medieval warfare was a little more complicated than that.

Chittorgarh is not a mere fort. It's a massive 700 acres of fortified city. Formidably built on a 180 meters high mountain top. That's huge, yes even by medieval standards. The citadel was the seat of power in the region since 7th century and reasonably so. The citadel is massive, difficult to access and most importantly it's designed to be self-sustainable when faced with prolonged siege. The water reservoirs and lands within can sustain an army of 50,000 for almost a year. Considering the dry, sandy landmasses of north western India, you can imagine why the citadel was so coveted. Yes, Chittorgarh means power. Whoever held the fort, held absolute power in the region. So now you can picture why exactly Alauddin Khilji was so interested.

Mr. Bhansali seems to have tried his best to picture Khilji as a roughed, bearded romantic but as any true historian worth his salt would tell you he was no such thing. He was a lowlife barbarian who liked killing infants over the heads of their mothers and used to boast about making towers of 20,000 Hindu skulls. As far as sexual orientation goes he was a known homosexual and pedophile. Now if this all-powerful sultan had coveted only
Rani Padmini don't you think he would have tried to have her kidnapped and smuggled out? See, I told you, medieval warfare was more complicated than Bollywood's twisted romanticism.

The war between Maharawal Ratan Singh and Alauddin Khilji resulted in an 8-month long siege of Chittorgarh. When finally, they fought full frontal battle, The Maharawal died fighting.

Now, what do you think would have happened then? Let me clarify further. When an invader intent on destroying another kingdom attacks, he does much more than just killing the ruler. Wars are fought more on psychological level than by swords and shields. Why do you think Devdutt Pattanaik Ji that even modern nations fiercely protect the family members of their heads of states?

Now how do you think Khilji would have proceeded after he had killed the Maharawal and most of his generals and lead warriors? Yes, he would capture the fort. How do you think he would have awarded his battle worn, travel worn and hungry foot-soldiers? He would have ordered them to go berserk on the citadel's residents. Rape any woman they find, loot anything they can lay their hands on. Devdutt Pattanaik Ji, medieval armies
where known to even rape and defile corpses.

Now how would he ensure that not a single living soul would dare to resist him further? The answer is obvious. He would hold the royal women and children captive. How he would ensure that the morals of the people of Mewar is broken to such extent that no one would dare an attack on him while he stays there? He would torture his captives and set examples.

Rani Padmini was the queen of a fierce warrior clan. Don't let the Romanticism and cheap popularization of Bollywood's film makers fool you into painting Rani Padmini as the naive, demure fancy doll. Rani Padmini knew what is going to be the fate of herself and hundreds of other women inside the citadel. They would have been raped, brutalized in every way possible, first by the sultan and his chief generals then gradually in decreasing order of military ranking. They would have been flogged, stripped naked and paraded around. Any infants and children would have been
killed before their mothers' eyes and this would go on endlessly till the sultan had absolutely made sure not a single male Rajput is left alive and motivated enough to start an uprising. The women who survived would then had been transported to his harems to be sold and resold as sex slaves if they live.

Think Devdutt Pattanaik Ji, what would it have done to the Morales of the vanquished people of Mewar who have lost family members in the long war to see their queen and her royal companions flogged through the streets and raped every day?
Rani Padmini knew better. She made sure that the Rajput flame for vengeance had to be kept burning. She knew she and her companions would have nothing but misery, torture and diseases if they are captured alive. She knew the brutes storming their walls do not even spare corpses in their desperate lust. She knew she can't have her people see her defiled dead body. So, she made a choice.

Yes Devdutt Pattanaik Ji, a choice. The choice of a queen who deserves every bit of the goddess like reverence she commands amongst her people till date. She decided that the brutes who have killed her husband and his gallant warriors will have nothing but a pile of ashes when then breach the walls of her citadel. She decided that she will not allow herself to be defiled and insulted. She decided that she will not let her people down.

She knew that her life was not merely her own but belongs to the people of Mewar who would one day rise again to avenge their beloved queen.

She could not have been righter Devdutt Pattanaik Ji, because Chittorgarh did not perish after Khilji captured it. Rani Padmini had kept the flame burning , merely a decade or so after that, Rajput sisodiyas regained control of the citadel. Chittorgarh saw lion hearts like Rana Sangram Singh,
Rana Udai Singh, Rana Kumbha and many other great Hindu rulers who kept on the glory of Mewar touching unfathomable heights.

Devdutt Pattanaik Ji, Rani Padmini did not choose death. She chose immortality.

~A proud Indian.

Edited by Sutapasima - 7 years ago


DO NOT COPY THIS POST AS THIS IS EXCLUSIVE TO INDIA FORUMS


Created

Last reply

Replies

13

Views

986

Users

8

Likes

16

Frequent Posters

Anurulz thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago
#2
I really liked the write up.. Thanks for it..
Sutapasima thumbnail

Love Legion

Posted: 7 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: anu rulz

I really liked the write up.. Thanks for it..


I now feel the Rajputs are not way out in crying the film insulted their queen 🤔
LegolasGondolin thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 7 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: Sutapasima


I now feel the Rajputs are not way out in crying the film insulted their queen 🤔


How did u conclude that?

The sena was protesting against an alleged scene between Rani and Khilji but the team clarified there is no such scene. The movie celebrated the valor and sacrifice of the Rajput queen and the King.

How is that insulting to the queen?
LegolasGondolin thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 7 years ago
#5
Great write up but then where is Khilji shown as a romantic in the trailer? He is shown as a barbarian someone evil I dint see any romantic aspect in what was shown in the trailer.
I cant believe people are drawing conclusions about the whole thing just merely based on the trailer. The ones who watched the film said that it is an ode to the Rajputs and their fighting spirit and they have nothing to be upset about.

Khilji was a powerful sultan, he had a larger army, he fought with mad rage, but the actual victory was denied to him even though he won the war as the queen chose self immolation.

--------

Sutapasima thumbnail

Love Legion

Posted: 7 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: LegolasGondolin

Great write up but then where is Khilji shown as a romantic in the trailer? He is shown as a barbarian someone evil I dint see any romantic aspect in what was shown in the trailer.

I cant believe people are drawing conclusions about the whole thing just merely based on the trailer. The ones who watched the film said that it is an ode to the Rajputs and their fighting spirit and they have nothing to be upset about.

Khilji was a powerful sultan, he had a larger army, he fought with mad rage, but the actual victory was denied to him even though he won the war as the queen chose self immolation.

--------


yes he was shocked to see how morally strong the Rajput women are ... they chose death to dishonor
AladdinKaChirag thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#7
Great right up, but i don't think bhansali is romanticising khilji's feelings anyway infact it's clear that this movie is all about rajput glory and their bravery. As for rani padmini, even many people here questioned her bravery, the fact is earlier people believed in Sar kata sakte hain par sar jhuka sakte nahin, even the male warriors preferred to kill themselves rather than becoming the slaves of somebody else. Even our great freedom fighter azaad chose to die through his own bullet rather than dying or being captured at the hands of britishers. Rani padmini preferred not to surrender to khilji, because that would give him victory. So this story signifies that even though khilji won the battle, he lost to rani padmavati's courage.
ibnbattuta thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#8
I think the write-up is directed more towards Pattanik's views on the matter rather than the film. Yes, invader Muslim armies were known to not even spare dead Hindu women which is why they immolated themselves.
There is a viewpoint being circulated by "liberals" that better to suffer rape and live than kill oneself. These people only need to look at the plight of the Yazidi women who were used as sex slaves and sold in Islamic mandis and every one of them said that they wished to have died instead.
s4santu thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#9
Very well written👏 , literally got goosebumps while reading
Mira25 thumbnail
7th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#10
Nice, fluent writeup. I think this is more directed at patnaik's views which I'm not aware of.
So in my view, one more attempt to decipher and judge the content of a film that has never been seen and a script, never been read.

We all can base our arguments only on the trailer for now, right?

As far as my knowledge goes, the trailer projects rajputs and their queen in extremely +ve light with high praises bestowed upon them through dialogue and ranisa chants.

The clip on a grand canvas showcases the vast expanse of chittor's fort, beautiful, love-filled visuals of rathan & padmini and more so their bravery and valour.

Khilji is mostly seen on battle ground and shown as obsessive, ambitious invader. I'm hopeful the film would also touch upon his barbaric war crimes.

DP &Shahid embody the royal finesse while Ranveer is feral. We could also see glimpses of padmini's aggression and resolve. Anything but a demure doll.

We had quick peek of the sequence leading upto jauhar too. The queen chose honour/death over surrender/life. So overall where is the portrayal wrong here?

No one can deny the historical fact that Khilji was a powerful ruler, warmonger, had a huge battalion and won the war. Do they want to change this also?

So what is the hue and cry all about...except for some groups political agenda
Edited by Mira25 - 7 years ago

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: priya185 · 6 months ago

Katrina Kaif’s sassy reply about Ranbir Kapoor someone posted her comment to Shahid but I liked this one...

Expand â–Ľ
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".