Exactly. My question is they hqve changed Vikram's stand on Anami. For Vikram Anamk was an impostor remember? If there was a parampara at all he would have said it to Satrupa before the dna test itself.
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 11th Oct 2025 - WKV
THALI KA BAINGAN 11.10
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Oct 11, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Tum se Tum tak episodes - EDT #2
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 12th Oct 2025 - WKV
Katrina has destroyed her face! even Kareena looks better than her
Anupamaa 11 Oct 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Masterminds-Pari n RV
Rumour - Alia Bhatt In Kalki 2
Kyunki episode Summary with pics : Oct 11
Dono Mihir’s Saath Main
Sakshi Tanwar to enter Kyunki
Is the Kajol-SRK pairing overrated?
Hardik Pandya Mahieka Sharma Relationship
East or West, Farhana is da beshhhttt
✦ Font-astic Voyage Contest Voting Round 2 | Invites ONLY ✦
Who all think Amaal singing every episode is ANNOYING!
Why is Hrithik wasting his time by doing all these?
No amount of jadu tona is enough for Alia bhatt and Filmfare editor
Exactly. My question is they hqve changed Vikram's stand on Anami. For Vikram Anamk was an impostor remember? If there was a parampara at all he would have said it to Satrupa before the dna test itself.
RKC is a show or rather only show where I love each of the characters and hate each of them too.
However, suddenly I have a feeling that the story is shifting to show Satrupa as a genuine mother to both Vatsalya and Anami. I mean they are justifying her character which was not required at all. She was wrong when she abandoned Anami. She cheated everyone. Let that be a mistake of her life.It never was a story about male heir vs female heir. Vikram and Baldev refused to accept Anami because they believed it was Satrupa's plan to maintain her status and power in tge family. It was a fake daughter. Now, all of a sudden Satrupa is feeling hopeless about how she is just a guardian to Royal steel and everything she owns here is because she is Vatsalya's mother. Is this an accurate fact? I am asking this because Satrupa introduced Anam to Vikram and everyone by saying, ' Aap Nirvash nahi huye hai Papa'. The same thing was said by Guruji also. So, when did the makers realise that the khandan has a parampara of male heir inheriting everything?And if this Parampara cannot be challenged then how come Baldev never became the heir? Clearly, the rule of succession was changed then. Why did Guruji think Anami being a girl will be accepted as the heir when the Parampara of LM is otherwise? He was the one who reminded satrupa about Anami.The day she delivered the twins she had three options1) keep both of them- which she could not choose because Guruji's prophecy about delivering twins again had come true. She had to give away the eldest of the two to keep her children safe and alive.2) giving away Vatsalya and keeping Anami- which now seems to be an impossible option after male heir vs female heir twist. Anami would have lived like a princess and both the siblings wpuld have been alive but despite the super sacrifice of givig away Vatsalya, Anami would leave empty handed and probably Avdhoot would have taken over as the heir.3) giving away Anamj and keeping Vatsalya- which she finally did because she thought this is the only way to save her children, give them a better life and let the original heir take the throne. It seemed to be a better option because at least one of the child would inherit what is rightfully his.It was a win win situation for her until vatsalya died.This way they are justifying Satrupa's character. Who else feels the same way?