Posted:
Originally posted by: shruthiravi
@Banjaran I had put in my post itself Satrupa kept the boy because of heir issue only as by that time she would have known the family.
Also the right was with bahu of the house and not beti. In a way compensation for her for making her marry his son who was already a father. Also he knew Satrupa will never cross the boundaries of being an ideal bahu and will obey him. He can always make her do what he expects her to do.Now it is beti of the house. As per tradition a girl who will go to another house, so can the business empire be entrusted to the girl that way.This is my view at this point, it can change also as story progress.
agreed Shruthi.
but the thing is.. now she is being a ferocious lioness fighting for her girl cub's right. but giving the very child up to keep boy child with her was a cop out.
what stopped her from doing what she is doing right now 17 years back?
she took an easy way out then. now she can't pile on entire blame on Guruji, Dadaji, lal mahal and so on. she too is a player in this very came of chess. she made her move willingly.
as of now i don't think Vikramaditya or Baldev detest Anami for being a girl. her being a girl is not an issue (as of now). her existence is the issue.
till they open their cards further i will give both of them benefit of doubt.😳
Cricket
Indian Mythology
