Simran - Let the blame game begin...

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

1123190

Hibernated

Posted: 8 years ago

#21

Originally posted by: ChadDimera
It's all Kanganas fault 😆

She sucks at life

😆 You should go under the radar for some time atleast.

Quote

Sri D

@SriRani

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#22

Kangana made sure that she is on every frame with powerful punchline. What heroes (as she claims) does in other movies, Kangana with her self indulgence did the same to other artists in the movie. So she brought the equality in Bollywood..👍🏼

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

JackSparrowcraz

@JackSparrowcraz

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#23

Kangana turned it into a self indulgent film and made sure than men get flowerpot roles.#feminism.

Quote

anushacrazy4GC

@anushacrazy4GC

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

#24

But the actual story that I read about kaur is so dark and in no angle it is funny... with out watching the movie i can't give a judgement about it... I think film would have been received well if there involved a negligible comedy and the plot was kept as dark as it really was...

Quote

1093604

Suspended

Posted: 8 years ago

#25

LMAO, the film is a flop, so-called Superstar could not even break 3cr opening, abysmal!

Where are all those fans posting view counts of Aap Ki Adalat, and boasting "overwhelming support" of Kangana online. 🤣 What this proves is that Youtube views and twitter popularity does not translate in real life, no one gives a monkeys about her film. 😆

Edited by Heisenberg17. - 8 years ago

Quote

EAST9

@EAST9

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

#26

😆

SIMRAN with 1500 screens, 3X NATIONAL AWARD, with big name director, commercial movie, it only can collect 2-3+ cr opening.

Finding Fanny F. wiith 900 screens, Indian English movie, collection 5+cr...

but... stil Kangana fans and their gang-up fans call out Deepu...😛😛

Edited by EAST9 - 8 years ago

Quote

807116

Hibernated

Posted: 8 years ago

#27

Originally posted by: anushacrazy4GC
But the actual story that I read about kaur is so dark and in no angle it is funny... with out watching the movie i can't give a judgement about it... I think film would have been received well if there involved a negligible comedy and the plot was kept as dark as it really was...

Even I felt the same. (Even I read her story, but did not watch the movie). It should have been presented as a dark thriller. May be makers thought, serious/dark films may not get audience. But Pan Singh Tomar was well received.

( Irfan Khan is also great actor and not a superstar like "The Khans". But he is not insecure. He does what he is best at. Acting. During film promotion, he knows his job is to speak about his movie. Finally they do good business. May not be 100 crores, still profitable).

Not blaming Kangana alone. I don't think, even original movie script was dark or intense. (Kangana might have made it more Kangana centric, that is all). But the main fault may be with the way subject was approached.

Amir does meddle in direction. But that is a pact decided before making the movie. (TZP's director had the choice to leave Amir and approach others before he went back to Amir). Hopefully, next time Kangana takes the decision early.

If Kangana had not meddled with the movie in the middle, carried on with the promotion professionally (speaking about the movies, rather than her invisible stardom, unprovable affairs), people would have applauded her acting, irrespective of film's results.

Quote

1 2 3

Simran - Let the blame game begin... - Page 3

Related Topics

Explore Topics