Why actors that debuted in the early 2000 couldn't become big star? - Page 2

Originally posted by: TeAmo_Messi

Hrithik was so huge and so complete as a starr that his competition killed others as all of them lacked the quality of being a superstar.

Hrithik was never even considered a competition for AB jr or shahid instead Hrithik is always compared with Khans. .

I think apart from Hrithik only actor who debuted in 2000 era and enjoyed solo box office success and a massive following is Emraan Hashmi. . Yes Emraan isn't considered a superstar but he was a hit machine. His box office ratiois as good as many big stars

Originally posted by: rim683

Oh I forgot about Emraan Hashmi but he wasn't taken very serious as an actor and his movies weren't much respected since media gave him a tag of serial kisser and he mostly ended up doing erotic movies. Coming to the topic, I don't think HR had anything to do with others actors failure, it's true that HR is more handsome and talented than the rest of the actors but that doesn't mean they flopped because of HR, most actors at that time didn't have the support that HR had because HR's dad always supported his career a lot and even produced movies for him but others actors didn't have that advantage at that time.

Originally posted by: TeAmo_Messi

Uday had a far bigger and richer dad who was the biggest producer in the country and Abhi's dad was the much bigger actor and could get any film for his son. Hrithik's dad was bankrupt when they made KHNPH and Hrithik brought back their golden days.

A lot if people say Hrithik is a superstar because of his dad but thats not the case its the other way round. Hrithik's films worked because he was more talented and watchable than rest of the star kids of that era. He would debut with farhan akhtar film if he wouldn't do KHNPH, if he would not do that film his father's production house would be closed.