Simran - Why nobody is promoting? DTNpg2 - Page 5

Originally posted by: springkissed

So you are saying her performance had nothing to do with how well queen did? 😆😆 Anyways, if you would have read well, I also wrote that primary reason for any film doing well is good script, she can not bring the audiences to the theater with a bad script. So queen having a good script was a forgone conclusion. And I will stick to the nepotism thing going in her favor, at least for the people that live outside of the bubble of IF. 😉

Originally posted by: .rasgulla.

And you gathered that how? Have you met all the people? For every ten people you meet who would talk about how nepotism favored Kangana, there would ne hundreds who would not even care about the whole debate.., the fact is such controversies and debates remain restricted to the so called bubbles alone.. People outside of these bubbles do not even care a bit about who said what..

As for her performance, of course it made the film better but it was not her performance that drew people to theater for sure.. No body went to watch Queen because they heard what a phenomenal performance Kangana had given.. they went because they heard what a good movie it was

Originally posted by: .rasgulla.

And you gathered that how? Have you met all the people? For every ten people you meet who would talk about how nepotism favored Kangana, there would ne hundreds who would not even care about the whole debate.., the fact is such controversies and debates remain restricted to the so called bubbles alone.. People outside of these bubbles do not even care a bit about who said what..

As for her performance, of course it made the film better but it was not her performance that drew people to theater for sure.. No body went to watch Queen because they heard what a phenomenal performance Kangana had given.. they went because they heard what a good movie it was

Originally posted by: ImagineMe

OK... a movie that rides on her peformance and where she is practically in each and every frame (or being referenced to, if absent). Her performance can't be separated from the "goodness" of the movie. They are both intercoupled.

Originally posted by: .rasgulla.

You misunderstand.. i never meant k Kangana does not deseeve credit for its success or that she was not good... all i meant was she was not the one who drew ppl to theaters for Queen.. TWMR yes but Queen certainly no..

Originally posted by: ImagineMe

Hopefully the concerned people can now move to the first promotional IV:

http://www.india-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=4890493