Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj 387...

MaddyO thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#1

19th February - 2 weeks from today is Shivaji Maharaj's 387th Birth Anniversary.

We are watching Peshwa Bajirao's story from his birth - with prominence given to depict the prevailing political scenario. How can we fully appreciate the achievements of Bajirao Peshwe unless we know what was the condition when he started?

On his birth anniversary, I think it will be appropriate to shed some light on situation prevailing at the time of Shivaji Maharaj's birth in 1630.

Shahaji Raje was working for Nijamshahi (he had tried to break away and build his own Maratha empire unsuccessfully) he was on the run from his own father-in-law Lakhuji Jadhav (he was sardar of Daulatabad Sultan). Jijabai was pregnant and could not travel fast so Shahaji Raje left her with Vishwasrao Sidhoji and Laxmibai in Junnar, (in-laws of Sambhaji Raje - first son of Shahaji Raje and Jijabai). Sambhaji Raje went with Shahaji Raje.

Lakhuji Jadhav on reaching Junnar and meeting Jijabai, requested her to stay in Sindkhed her maternal home. Jijabai refused as it would have been an insult to Bhosale's in the circumstances. For security reasons Jijabai, Vishwasrao and Laxmibai shifted to Shivneri Fort.


Political situation was very tense during her pregnancy


In revenge against Shahaji Raje, Vijapur sardar Murar Jagdev attacked and looted Pune which was Shahaji Raje's jagir and burnt down entire Pune. Murar Jagdev did nangarani (cultivation of soil) of Pune by donkeys to drive home the insult. Shahaji Raje was in Phaltan at this time. Jijabai was very upset on getting this news.


Shahaji Raje's cousin Kholoji's wife, Jijabai's co-sister was kidnapped by Mahabat Khan when she had gone on pilgrimage to Nashik. Jijabai was in agony hearing this.

Soon after, when Jijabai's father Lakhuji Jadhav had gone to pay respects to Sultan of Daulatabad, Lakhuji and Jijabai's 3 brothers Achaloji, Raghoji and Yashwantrao were butchered in Sultan's darbar. Jijabai was inconsolable.

There was severe draught and famine in entire Maharashtra. People had to leave their homes in search of livelihood.

Jijabai was devastated by this continuous chain of agonizing tragedies.

Shivaji Shahaji Bhosale was born on Shivneri fort on 19th February 1630, in this political and social atmosphere.

Soon after birth, Naropant Shashtri noted the birth time and date and using Panchang wrote Shivaji Maharaj's horoscope.

Jijabai told Shastriji to speak the truth. Jijabai said during the pregnancy Shahaji Raje's Pune jahagir was looted and burnt down completely, Shivaji lost his maternal grand-father Lukhuji and his uncles, his father and brother have no stable home, were on the run. There was famine and draught. Jijabai had no home to speak of, she had to give birth away from her maternal and marital families. When she was carrying Shivaji this was the state so what after Shivaji's birth? What is Shivaji's future predicting?

Shashtriji told Jijabai with the birth of Shivaji all "durbhagya" bad times are over. It is the dawn of new era - you have given birth to a son who will shine like sun. He will fulfill all your dreams and you will always be proud looking at him.


Shivaji Maharaj took oath of Hindavi Swarajya on 15th April 1645 at the age of 15.

Shivaji Maharaj's Coronation as Chhatrapati on 6th June 1674 at the age of 44.

Jijabai always encouraged and supported Shivaji Maharaj - she lived to see her and her son's dreams fulfilled, after seeing her son's Maratha empire strong and thriving, watched her son's coronation as Chhatrapati and passed away content 11 days after the coronation, at the age of 80.

At Shivaji Maharaj's death on 3rd April 1680 at 50 years of age, his Maratha Empire had

2.5 Lakh strong army and 240 fortified forts.

He had built sea forts and had a strong navy.

Thriving strong financial status of empire.

Shivaji Maharaj's Maratha Empire was larger than most European countries.

Shivaji Maharaj still rules the hearts and minds of Maharashtrians 387 years later. Every child wants to dress up as Shivaji in fancy dress competitions in school or play the part of Shivaji in plays. There is pure respect and unconditional devotion for him in every Maharashtrians hearts even today. That will remain always ...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


* There is dispute about Shivaji Maharaj's actual date of birth 19th February or 15th March. I recently read that his actual date of birth as per English Julian calendar is 19th February. However, his date of birth as per Shalivahan Shak month-tithi is 15th March i.e. Falgun Vadya Tritiya (Krishna Paksha).

For e.g. today is 9th of Magh month 1938 (Shalivahan Shak). Incidentally the festivals are celebrated according to this calendar so Diwali is in Kartik month and Ganapati Utsav in Bhadrapad month. This is why these festivals are on different dates every year as per English calendar!

Edited by MaddyO - 8 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

32

Views

7k

Users

7

Likes

149

Frequent Posters

MaddyO thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#2
I request everybody who appreciates this post to contribute their thoughts, their views on Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj.

It will be our homage to the Chhatrapati who still rules his subjects 387 years on.


The.Lannister thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 8 years ago
#3
A fantastic post Maddy! 👍🏼 Quite informative😳
history_geek thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 8 years ago
#4

Maddy,

The best tribute, it is said, comes from your critics / enemies. So, here i find it appropriate to quote 3 authorities who were no friends of Shivaji.

1. Mughal historian Khafi Khan*

He writes : " Shiva always strived to maintain the honor of people in his territories. He persevered in a course of rebellion, in plundering caravans, and troubling mankind ; but he entirely abstained from disgraceful acts and was careful to maintain the honor** of women and children of Muhammadans (Muslims) when they fell into his hands. His injunctions upon this point were very strict, and anyone who had disobeyed them received punishment."


* - He is also called a "plagiarist historian". Lol. But that 'distinction' of his is not related to this topic. It is something else.

** - This makes me remember Maharana Pratap. Remember, the entire harem of Abdur Rahim Khan-i-Khana was captured by his son Amar Singh while they were battling with forces of Akbar ; but were released and sent back with escort on orders of Maharana.




2. This one comes from the English merchants of Surat. I rate this among the best words written for him.

" Shivaji is the fairest friend, noblest enemy, and the most politique prince. He will continue to be victorious, even to a miracle. He came, he saw, he conquered*.

He has taken two very strong rocks, no less, dexterous threat than Alexander the Great and became master of Bijapur.

He has vowed to his God, never to sheath his sword till he has reached Delhi and shut Aurangzeb with it. He had many Muslims in his service and the head of his Navy was a Muslim.

He loved his country and was not partial to anyone but he could not tolerate conversion of his brethren to either Islam or Christianity. The underlying reason for his vengeance upon Aurangzeb was the religious policy of that monarch. "

* - Referring to his victories in Karnataka.



3. This comes from the Dutch Christian missionaries. Shivaji had sacked Surat. During that sack, he spared 2 very rich merchants / Christian missionaries.

One was a very noble Christian priest and another was the family of an extremely rich humanitarian money lender who was in service of Dutch East India company. The contemporary French records are quoted in this blog. Again it is a 2 year old blog.

http://mariam-uz-zamani.blogspot.in/2015/08/did-shivaji-maharaj-really-plunder-surat.html#.WJgnqxJ2m1s




Actually, starting with Shivaji there comes a change in the method of warfare of native rulers. His policy was very simple. Tit for Tat. "If you ravage my town, then i am not going to spare your dominions either."

A fear was created in minds of his enemies that the kind of warfare they saw till now was going to be a thing of the past. They will be dealt/replied in their own language which they understand. But even here you get glimpses of humanity.


PS : You have mentioned in your post, that he was born in the Shivneri Fort. This reminds me -> When Peshwa Bajirao was preparing a treaty to be signed with the Mughal Emperor at Delhi, the IInd clause in that treaty was to ask for the return of Fort of Shivneri to Chatrapati Shahu (as that was the birth place of Shivaji). And it was not a request. It was a blunt demand from the Peshwa!

MaddyO thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#5



Jai Bhavaani Jai Shivaji 😃

Hi Arijit, surely who knows Jai Bhavaani can write more about Shivaji Maharaj 😆

MaddyO thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: The.Lannister

A fantastic post Maddy! 👍🏼 Quite informative😳




Thanks Shruti 😃
Common I know how well you write and how well informed you are. So I expect a post from you on Shivaji Maharaj 😆
MaddyO thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: history_geek


Maddy,

The best tribute, it is said, comes from your critics / enemies. So, here i find it appropriate to quote 3 authorities who were no friends of Shivaji.

1. Mughal historian Khafi Khan*

He writes : " Shiva always strived to maintain the honor of people in his territories. He persevered in a course of rebellion, in plundering caravans, and troubling mankind ; but he entirely abstained from disgraceful acts and was careful to maintain the honor** of women and children of Muhammadans (Muslims) when they fell into his hands. His injunctions upon this point were very strict, and anyone who had disobeyed them received punishment."


* - He is also called a "plagiarist historian". Lol. But that 'distinction' of his is not related to this topic. It is something else.

** - This makes me remember Maharana Pratap. Remember, the entire harem of Abdur Rahim Khan-i-Khana was captured by his son Amar Singh while they were battling with forces of Akbar ; but were released and sent back with escort on orders of Maharana.




2. This one comes from the English merchants of Surat. I rate this among the best words written for him.

" Shivaji is the fairest friend, noblest enemy, and the most politique prince. He will continue to be victorious, even to a miracle. He came, he saw, he conquered*.

He has taken two very strong rocks, no less, dexterous threat than Alexander the Great and became master of Bijapur.

He has vowed to his God, never to sheath his sword till he has reached Delhi and shut Aurangzeb with it. He had many Muslims in his service and the head of his Navy was a Muslim.

He loved his country and was not partial to anyone but he could not tolerate conversion of his brethren to either Islam or Christianity. The underlying reason for his vengeance upon Aurangzeb was the religious policy of that monarch. "

* - Referring to his victories in Karnataka.



3. This comes from the Dutch Christian missionaries. Shivaji had sacked Surat. During that sack, he spared 2 very rich merchants / Christian missionaries.

One was a very noble Christian priest and another was the family of an extremely rich humanitarian money lender who was in service of Dutch East India company. The contemporary French records are quoted in this blog. Again it is a 2 year old blog.

http://mariam-uz-zamani.blogspot.in/2015/08/did-shivaji-maharaj-really-plunder-surat.html#.WJgnqxJ2m1s




Actually, starting with Shivaji there comes a change in the method of warfare of native rulers. His policy was very simple. Tit for Tat. "If you ravage my town, then i am not going to spare your dominions either."

A fear was created in minds of his enemies that the kind of warfare they saw till now was going to be a thing of the past. They will be dealt/replied in their own language which they understand. But even here you get glimpses of humanity.


PS : You have mentioned in your post, that he was born in the Shivneri Fort. This reminds me -> When Peshwa Bajirao was preparing a treaty to be signed with the Mughal Emperor at Delhi, the IInd clause in that treaty was to ask for the return of Fort of Shivneri to Chatrapati Shahu (as that was the birth place of Shivaji). And it was not a request. It was a blunt demand from the Peshwa!




Thanks Abhay for this wonderful post 👏👏👏 You have shared rare information and felt very proud reading it. I will check out the blog link.

I don't know if many here on PB forum are aware that you are a non-Maharashtrian and do not speak Marathi! Still our knowledge about Maratha history pales in comparison with your research and knowledge.

For e.g. I did not know about Peshwa Bajirao asking for Fort Shivneri!

I remember reading your post on JA forum about the harem of Rahim freed on instructions of Maharan Pratap.


Reading about Khafi Khan's post, I must share this

Shivaji Maharaj was very particular about safety, protection and respect of women in his entire kingdom, those disobeying were punished harshly.

I will share an incident which is legendary

Shivaji Maharaj's army attacked Kalyan and defeated Mulla Ahmed its Subedar. They also captured the khajina or treasury of Kalyan in transit, it was being sent to Vijapur. Accompanying the khajina were Subhedar's son Mulla Yahia and daughter-in-law. They were arrested.

The treasure and Mulla Ahmed and Mulla Yahia were presented before Shivaji Maharaj in Kalyan. Shivaji Maharaj pardoned them both.

Aabaji Mahadev the sardar who had attacked Kalyan then told Shivaji Maharaj about Subhedar's daughter-in-law and told she is a rare beauty.

She was presented in darbar with a suggestion that she be treated the same way enemies treat our captured women. Aabaji reminded about Rani Padmini or sister of Rani Durgawati who was made part of Akbar's harem.

Seeing her face Shivaji Maharaj said "if my mother was as beautiful as her then even I would have looked as great". He said she reminded him of his mother and she should be treated with same respect.

Shivaji Maharaj ordered her release with honor and sent them all back to Vijapur.

When this news reached Raigad Jijabai was overwhelmed with pride and climbed down to fort entrance to welcome Shivaji Maharaj with aarati.

MaddyO thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: history_geek


Maddy,

The best tribute, it is said, comes from your critics / enemies. So, here i find it appropriate to quote 3 authorities who were no friends of Shivaji.

1. Mughal historian Khafi Khan*

He writes : " Shiva always strived to maintain the honor of people in his territories. He persevered in a course of rebellion, in plundering caravans, and troubling mankind ; but he entirely abstained from disgraceful acts and was careful to maintain the honor** of women and children of Muhammadans (Muslims) when they fell into his hands. His injunctions upon this point were very strict, and anyone who had disobeyed them received punishment."




Abhay, I already post a reply to you when another incident came to mind

Shivaji Maharaj was given Pune jagir by Shahaji Raje when he came back to Pune from Bungluru with Jijabai. He was young then and the administration was handled by Dadoji Kondadev. Jijabai used to mete out justice if complaints were raised before her.

Shivaji Maharaj along with few friends had gone for riding. They were passing Rajzne village when a villager stopped and asked for justice. His daughter was kidnapped by the Patil of the village when she had gone to river and raped, she committed suicide (Patils used to be de-facto rulers of villages). Shivaji Maharaj sent one of his friends to call Patil but he returned empty handed with a message from Patil that Shivaji Raje was namesake Raja but he Patil was the real ruler and he considered the villagers his slaves to do what he feels right with them.

Shivaji Maharaj returned to Pune and sent mavles/soldiers to capture Patil. He was brought to Pune and the complainant's complaint heard. Patil admitted to the crime and Shivaji Maharaj said this while announcing his punishment
"He might be namesake Raja and Patil might be real ruler of the village, but he considered all his praja his subjects as his children his responsibility. He will not allow women to be disrespected"

Shivaji Maharaj meted out punishment of cutting of arms and legs of the Patil and he be paraded all over Ranzne.

This incident created a real sensation and it served as warning to errant Patils.

Incidentally this was before taking the oath of Hindavi Swaraj and Shivaji Maharaj was 14-15 years old when he meted out this justice!

Edited by MaddyO - 8 years ago
Marathi_Mulgi thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 8 years ago
#9
slow read will read it
thanks for sharing
The.Lannister thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 8 years ago
#10
Thanks for those kind words Maddy! 😳 I really dont know much about Shivaji Maharaj, especially when compared to the likes of Abhay or you or a few others here. What I know is what I have read from various sources.

But to celebrate his birth let me write a little something about his warfare tactic, the famous guerilla warfare or ghanim-i-qavvait (ganimi kaava in Marathi). While this technique is very old & was used even by Shri Krishna to defeat Kaal Yavan, it was reintroduced in the Deccan by Malik Ambar. Ganim -i- kaivvat is an Arabic word in which "ganim" means successful. This strategy of war is supposed to be so sure shot in nature that it guarantees a win to anyone who employs it successfully & hence "success" is in its name itself.

We see Indians giving a lot of importance to fighting fairly. However with the repeated attacks of the Mughals who did not fight fair, Indians started suffering immeasurable losses due to their fair fighting principles when facing an unprincipled enemy, a need to reply back in the same coin was felt & that was why ganim-i-kaivvat was adopted. According to this principle the ends define the means. This method included causing max losses to the enemy with little or minimum losses to our side. It gives the common man, who isnt a soldier, who isnt trained in warfare a chance to fight a powerful enemy by any means with just one goal: survival! Hence it is OK to run away from the battle field if you see the enemy is stronger & you cannot win (Rannchod!) Hence it involves pillaging villages, looting, setting fire to crops, avoiding direct confrontation, etc.& adopting all means to ensure the enemy cannot proceed unharmed through your territory. It includes making the land inhospitable for the enemy. All this is starkly different to the "kshatriya dharma" which was popularly followed by Indian Kings since times immemorial. It would be very difficult for a soldier to run away from the battle field but not for a common man who is following this method. The goal here was to survive to fight another day.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".