ekta sud stay away from history issues

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

susan

@Susan.Dsouza

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: darkknight420

bcoz rukaiya told before death that she wants to get buried in her paternal ancestral place ...ya HEARD IT CORRECT RUKAIYYA WAS HIS FAV...want to know more go to book shop and buy some archeological history related book...fictions create by serial and film cant change history...so u need correction...harka/jodha may be his one of beloved queen...it does not mean rukayya,s character was negative...i am not against jodha-akbar love story...um against butchering a historical character rukaiyya like this

Did i said ruks is negative in real life ? U said ruks is more fav then jodha which is nt correct becoz i never heard abt ruks and jalal but yes.i.heard abt.jodha and jalal

Quote

not needed

@wendy25

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: Arpi1234
When it comes to mythological and historical serials people will watch it if they only show real history without adding much fictions...Yes the way channel and PH showing greatest rulers of our country as "Majnu" people will loose faith in history... One of the example is Ashoka in colors when they made Ashok as majnu ashok running behind karauwki... What a character assassination of Ashoka... If it is ekta's own history then why she named the show chandranandini insulating Chandragupta Maurya... She could have given it a different name like Bahubaali movie which is a fictional movie with nothing to do with history...

Absolutely...

Ekta's or matter of fact any historical show now days barely show any history.. and the main target is Trp.

Truth is warriors have Aims and struggles ,not fairytale lovestories which madam ekta wants to portray..

If they were that much of a love sick bafoons then would have never made history

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

swriter

@swriter

Dazzler

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: wendy25

Absolutely...
Ekta's or matter of fact any historical show now days barely show any history.. and the main target is Trp.
Truth is warriors have Aims and struggles ,not fairytale lovestories which madam ekta wants to portray..
If they were that much of a love sick bafoons then would have never made history

Yaaa u r right buddy
But ye baat Indian producers or directors ko kaun samjhaye 😆

Quote

ErisedWitch45

@ErisedWitch45

Dazzler

+ 5

Posted: 8 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: Arpi1234
When it comes to mythological and historical serials people will watch it if they only show real history without adding much fictions...Yes the way channel and PH showing greatest rulers of our country as "Majnu" people will loose faith in history... One of the example is Ashoka in colors when they made Ashok as majnu ashok running behind karauwki... What a character assassination of Ashoka... If it is ekta's own history then why she named the show chandranandini insulating Chandragupta Maurya... She could have given it a different name like Bahubaali movie which is a fictional movie with nothing to do with history...

Totally agree. Even I was thinking the same thing. To prevent ire of history-lovers or general people, she could have shown the same story with different names. And stated that it's a work of fiction. I am ignoring the "history" part fully and just watching for the drama and romance.

Quote

ErisedWitch45

@ErisedWitch45

Dazzler

+ 5

Posted: 8 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: Susan.Dsouza
Did i said ruks is negative in real life ? U said ruks is more fav then jodha which is nt correct becoz i never heard abt ruks and jalal but yes.i.heard abt.jodha and jalal

I don't know how true the movie or show Jodha Akbar was but I guess 1 reason for the lack of knowledge about Ruqaiya might be her non-presence/skewed presentation in the film/serial. Ruqaiya was his most prominent and chief wife despite of not being able to produce an heir (which was very imp in those times to carry on the lineage), she held imp postions/influenced imp decisions in those times. She was so imp that Akbar let her raise his grand-son (Shah Jahan) too.

Quote

darkknight420

@darkknight420

Explorer

Posted: 8 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: Susan.Dsouza

Did i said ruks is negative in real life ? U said ruks is more fav then jodha which is nt correct becoz i never heard abt ruks and jalal but yes.i.heard abt.jodha and jalal

ya she was fav of jalal...but some film makers and serial director found a good plot on jodha-akbar story...but it does not mean history sud also change...in some historian even accounts no existance of jodha bai...

Quote

ariyabestfan

@ariyabestfan

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#17

The reality is its ekta kapoor's show..
N if u want to watch her show..just don't use ur brain like the characters in the show don't use brain..lol..

But seriously.. When I saw first episode of this show I found some similarity like bahubali..

Actually I am big fan of history oriented serials..so also watch jodha Akbar till the story of salim n anarkali starts..

Jodha Akbar was really good show but ya of course they make rukayya very negative.. Even add ghost,vishkanya drama also in it which is totally imaginary of the show writer only..

Quote

1 2

ekta sud stay away from history issues - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics