No Police Officer Can Summon My Client- Kangana's lawyer to Hrithik

In case you've missed it, Hrithik Roshan has filed a fresh FIR againstKangana Ranaut, alleging that she created a fake email ID to defame him. Her lawyer, Rizwan Siddiquee has now issued a statement regarding this matter -

No Police Officer can summon my client Ms. Kangana Ranaut or her sister Ms. Rangoli to any police station to record their statement as a witness under Section 160 of CRPC. The Witness summons sent to my client and her sister by the Police Officer is patently illegal, as no woman can ever be called to the police station to record their statements as per the provisions of law. Nonetheless my client who is shown to be a victim as per the claims of Mr. Hrithik Roshan has herself willingly expressed her desire to co-operate with the officers in accordance to the provisions of law, as well as in her reply to the Summons she has duly reserved her rights to file an appropriate criminal complaint against Mr. Hrithik Roshan and his associates for hacking two of her email accounts, which includes the email from which Mr. Hrithik Roshan admittedly claims to have personally received about 1439 emails from my client on his correct email id as well the email from which my client was communicating with the alleged imposter. The crux of the matter is simple Mr. Hrithik Roshan had admittedly full knowledge of the so-called imposter in the month of May 2014. However, he did not wish to take any action against the so-called imposter for good seven months nor did he as a responsible citizen, then bother to take the required details of the imposter from my client during those seven months. Thereafter sometime in December 2014 Mr. Hrithik Roshan filed an informal complaint with the cyber cell, with full knowledge that no investigation shall be carried out by the Police on an informal complaint. During this time Mr. Hrithik Roshan admittedly started receiving mails from my client on his correct email id for more than a year, however he did not block them for reasons best known to him. Mr. Hrithik Roshan then thereafter sent a defamation Notice to my client stating my client defamed him because "Silly-Ex" referred to by my client in one of her interviews was him. In his Notice, he claimed that he did not know my client socially at all. He also interalia claimed that he was receiving 50 emails a day from my client. He further specifically claimed that my client was using his name to gain publicity. In reply to his Advocate's notice, I on behalf of my client proved the extent of blatant lies that his notice contained and questioned him as to how was he attending my client's private birthday party with his entire family and my client was attending his party besides his sister's and his father's birthday party as well, if he did not know my client socially at all. Besides I questioned him on his exaggerated claims of receiving 50 emails from my client ever day and why did he prudently not block my client if it was one-way communication. The basis of sending a defamation notice was also questioned as no case for defamation was made out in the Notice. Mr. Hrithik Roshan was also prudently questioned as to why no case was registered against an imposter at the right time when it was required. He was required to act on my notice within 7 days. However thereafter on receiving my notice on the 1st of March he cleverly chose to maintain a dignified silence" as there could not have been any good reply to my notice where his statements were proved to be blatant lies. Subsequent to this he conveniently chose to divert all media attention to a so-called imposter to deviate from the main subject of having criminally threatened my client and having intimidated her, without any provocation or good reason at all. As a matter of fact it is my client who has actually suffered and has yet maintained a dignified silence so far. These acts of deviating media attention by filing a belated F.I.R. after about 2 years against a so-called imposter pursuant to receipt of my notice is another unintelligent attempt. Things were started by Mr. Hrithik Roshan and he should come forward and end it in a proper manner.

http://www.missmalini.com/2016/03/31/no-police-officer-can-summon-client-kanganas-lawyer-responds-hrithiks-fir/

Hrithik is going through a mid life crisis. pls understand.

Ye kaisa lawyer hai jisko her statement media mein dena hota hai? Is it too hard to let the court to the job?😕

In between a lll the ramble, the lawyer got one thing right - HR is diverting the issue. The initial case was about the 'silly ex' comment - number of mails exchanged or with who does not matter.

Originally posted by: yamyam

Ye kaisa lawyer hai jisko her statement media mein dena hota hai? Is it too hard to let the court to the job?😕

Rizvan siddiqui hmm Is he bollywood stars favourite lawyer?

Originally posted by: grounder

Achcha hai na .. otherwise how will we get to have fun 😆

Kangana's lawyer is probably following what kangana does, come out in the open and bring the whole pseudos in the media and show the reality. Otherwise, all these BW types simply brush things under the carpet and maintain their saintly image. And the stupid fans just keep on thinking that their favs are really that big great things. These people are just actors, I like when they are treated as just that instead of some demi-gods.

Arey bhai ..kehna kya chahte ho?

It makes sense to leak it to the media from Kangana's side.

No totally untrue . You don't go this far to hide a relationship . People should really open their eyes.
Kangana claims that this man was Hrithik with whom she was having an online relationship. He claims it wasn't him and is going to great lengths to prove so. Thats the first bit.
Secondly is then her emails to his real id which were unanswered and unwanted. As per her own statement the only other claim of a relationship was 3 party appearances . 1 that he made and 2 that she did . In court she is making NO claims of any other relationship because there wasn't one and for Hrithik to take this to court he can clearly prove so. Hence her claiming there was or the silly ex comment was defamation .
She is alledging a relationship based on the emails with the imposter because everything else was one sided.
The rest of the gossip was for the media only .
Why did take the case to court ? Because nothing else would have stopped her accusations or her emails which were going on until February of this year , even after the infamous pope comment .