is skin-whitening racist? great article

Singh23 thumbnail
21st Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#1

this is a great article, please comment

Acclaimed skin-whitening studies from Ottawa raise racism concerns

29/10/2007 10:40:24 AM
Printer-friendly page

Award-winning research by Ottawa biochemists into technology that makes dark skin fairer is renewing controversy about a type of cosmetic product worth billions in Asian markets.

CBC News

Two graduate students at Carleton University, Pratik Lodha and Eman Ahmed-Muhsin, have been developing Gloriel, a skin-lightening cream based on Nobel Prize-winning gene-silencing technology.

The product won $5,000 as a finalist in the 2007 Student Technology Venture Challenge, an annual business competition for post-secondary students in eastern Ontario and western Quebec.

The research has also been awarded additional funding from Carleton University and the inventors hope to patent it in two years so they can sell the rights to a cosmetic giant such as L'Oreal.

Lodha's inspiration for the idea came from India, where he is from and where skin-lightening creams are a billion-dollar industry.

Critics have accused the industry of racism and imperialism. Ranni Moorthy, a U.K.-based actress from India, told CBC News the products are touted as cures, as if dark skin is "some kind of disease, to be put right."

"This idea of kind of positioning oneself on ... Western beauty standards is quite insidious," Moorthy said.

Ahmed-Muhsin defended the technology, which she says could also be used by pale people to darken their skin.

"We're not racist," she said, pointing out that tanning products are popular in North American in the way whitening products are in places such as India, Japan and China.

"The market exists and we're not going to increase or decrease that market. We're just offering a safer and more effective method."

She said many skin-whitening products contain harmful chemicals that can damage skin.

In 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration proposed a ban on over-the-counter sales of skin-lightening products, citing potential health risks of the common ingredient hydroquinone.

Hydroquinone is a possible carcinogen and has been linked with disfiguring condition called ochronosis that causes darkening and thickening of the skin, along with raised bumps and greyish-brown spots.

Unlike those products, Gloriel uses a reversible gene-silencing method called RNA interference to reduce the production of skin pigments called melanin.

The technology, invented by U.S. researchers Andrew Z. Fire and Craig C. Mello, won the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2006

Created

Last reply

Replies

6

Views

1.1k

Users

4

Likes

1

Frequent Posters

sabrinaa. thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 18 years ago
#2
Please dont spam. Use the thank you button. 😊

- I dont think if someone tries to make their skin a bit more darker, its racism. Even my black friends say " no, i dont wanna stand in the sun, ill get more black!" 😳
i agree with ahmed- its not racist. 😊
Singh23 thumbnail
21st Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: Sabrinaa xo

Please dont spam. Use the thank you button. 😊

- I dont think if someone tries to make their skin a bit more darker, its racism. Even my black friends say " no, i dont wanna stand in the sun, ill get more black!" 😳
i agree with ahmed- its not racist. 😊

good point but its not make skin lighter thats the issue its the WHY that is the issue, why is it deemed better, more attractive, its probally got to do with colonial mentality due to hundreds of years of european rule, also there can be serious health problems caused by using skin lightening products, the chemicals and acids in them must have side effects.

so it might not be hardcore racism but a "lighter" 😆 form. i mean mention skin lightening products outside of india like in usa or canada, and eye brows will raise, lol even oprah asked ashwariya rai about it when rai was on her show. it is a cause for concern i think.

beauty has become very euro-centric, indians want light skin, same with many black ppl. asian girls get eye lift surgery to make ther eyes look more like white eyes (or everyone elses for that matter). black women starighten their hair from there natual cruels, even tyra banks admitted to that, she said she did it for a reason.

Edited by Singh23 - 18 years ago
missy6892 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#4
This is one of those rare occasions where i wonder what michael jacksons opinion would be.
Singh23 thumbnail
21st Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: missy6892

This is one of those rare occasions where i wonder what michael jacksons opinion would be.

😆

😆

😆

😆

😆 good one.

miss5stars thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#6
omg its not rascist its sum1s opnion..
sum pple want dark skin nd prefer it
&
sum pple want lite skin nd perfer it
its all sum1s opnion 😆
sabrinaa. thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 18 years ago
#7
yea, whoever quoted me is right, but its also their own opinion, as miss5stars mentioned. 😛

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".