I never wanted to be like my mother- Kaikeyi

shruthiravi thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#1

We humans have a problem. We make judgement faster and we expect everyone to accept our view. And that is what that has happened to Kaikeyi. Her whole idea of being an ideal wife was because of the fact that her father sacrificed her mother as her mother was selfish. So an inborn fear was there in her that her husband can sacrifice her and all her steps she took was because of this fear.

And because of that we can say Kaikeyi was never her true self. If you look unlike other queens Kaikeyi has more warrior like qualities. You can really call her a tomboyish woman of those days. One who had a free will and independent thoughts.

But growing up in an environment conditioned to believe anything not feminine is selfishness as part of the woman her true self was buried under the garb of ideal wife.

And this ideal wife expected unconditional love and loyalty. When she didn't get it, her true self started coming out but in a negative way.

We have to know two things here. First never make any judgement without knowing the complete story. Especially stories about past. It always has 2 sides. And if we decide to live life on half baked truths or rather half knowledge then results can always be disastrous.

You cannot become ideal wife, ideal son or ideal whatever because of fear or some pre conceived notions controlling your actions.

Second there is no point burying your true self. You are doing the biggest disservice to yourself and a society at large when you bury your true self and pretend to be someone else. Because you cannot keep that persona for long. Your inner world will always be at conflict and one fine day everything will spill out and most probably by that time your worst fears also will come true.

Edited by shruthiravi - 9 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

24

Views

2.3k

Users

10

Likes

117

Frequent Posters

b2011 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#2
Nice analysis Shruthi. Liked your previous analysis of sacrifice and giving also. You are right about being our true self even if we differ from others or does not meet others expectations.
radianteyes. thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#3
Its a very nice analysis , quoting lines and giving meanings its a wonderful idea .
Nice keep writing .
SWEEBILLI thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#4
I am loving new version of Kaikeyi...
varshu27 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#5
What a brilliant post!!!. I guess all of us tend to hide our true self at one point or another . The freedom that we get from being ourselves is unparalleled. As a saying goes.. It is better to be hated for who you are rather than be loved for who you are not...
CutiepieAD thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#6
Very well said
There is no point in hiding your trueself and be pretentious... As for how long can you run away from yourself... One day it has to come out
shruthiravi thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#7
@varshu you know why some villians are loved more than the heroes. It is the lack of pretense. We say people admire Ravan, people admire Duryodhan, shakuni etc etc. why. The reason is villians have more human element with them than the heroes.
Heroes will be loved the same way if we take the garb of divinity from them, instead of putting them on a pedestal show them as people who struggled against all odds and emerged victorious.
Take the garb of divinity from Ram and look at him as a human. A man whose supreme power of love conquering the might of lanka. His mental power, his compassion making the impossible possible. To the demon king who asked him who are you, the only answer is I am a husband protected by my wife's love and it is my duty to protect her honor. Ram goes beyond Ravan miles ahead when you take the blinkers off.
Look at Arjun as a young prince who irrespective of the struggles life gave him was able to view the world always with a glass is half full attitude. A man to whom his friendship and the presence of his friend mattered more than his friend's power and wealth. Look at Krishna as an individual who irrespective of being a prince didn't hesitate to come as a charioteer for his best friend who trusted him so much.
Divinity was in the relation of Ram-Sita, it was in the relation of Ram-Lakhan, Ram-Hanuman, Krishna-Arjuna. They were so committed to each other that they gave themselves to the relation without expecting anything in return. Can we make our relations divine like theirs is the question we need to ask.
prav2 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#8
@blue - beautifully written👏
@bold - Thought for the day...

Originally posted by: shruthiravi


Take the garb of divinity from Ram and look at him as a human. A man whose supreme power of love conquering the might of lanka. His mental power, his compassion making the impossible possible. To the demon king who asked him who are you, the only answer is I am a husband protected by my wife's love and it is my duty to protect her honor. Ram goes beyond Ravan miles ahead when you take the blinkers off.
Look at Arjun as a young prince who irrespective of the struggles life gave him was able to view the world always with a glass is half full attitude. A man to whom his friendship and the presence of his friend mattered more than his friend's power and wealth. Look at Krishna as an individual who irrespective of being a prince didn't hesitate to come as a charioteer for his best friend who trusted him so much.
Divinity was in the relation of Ram-Sita, it was in the relation of Ram-Lakhan, Ram-Hanuman, Krishna-Arjuna. They were so committed to each other that they gave themselves to the relation without expecting anything in return. Can we make our relations divine like theirs is the question we need to ask.



Ramyalaxmi thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#9
@Shruthi: Good analysis as always.
Kaikeyi used the two boons which according to her was dharma to make dhasarath fulfil his promise given to her father, Ram obliged washer man and banished Sita which was dharma for Ram. Is it not the dharma independent of situation/people? If we analyse from each person's POV then it gives an explanation their are right in their own view. Is dharma flexible?

Sorry, I think I deviated from the title but your analysis pushed me ask.
shruthiravi thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#10
@Ramya I will keep Sita banishment out of purview of discussion because I really want to dwell more into it, a bit more rationally before bringing the dharma aspect into it. Currently I feel my analysis on the subject is half baked.
Now do you remember the title track of 1989 Mahabharath " Katha ye Purusharth ki hai, swarth ki, paramarth ki"( Tranasaltion: mahabharth is a story of purusharth, that of selfishness and real knowledge)
When does something become dharma. When the action does not have any selfishness associated with it. An action that does not expect any personal gain by making the choice. For e.g Ram had to go to vanvass as it was his duty to ensure raghuvansh vachan is kept. But Lakshman had no obligation to follow him, neither had bharath any obligation not to take the throne of Ayodhya. If you look at the action of both these brothers it was selfless samarpan to their elder brother and his policies by the youngsters. They were not expecting any personal gain, popularity, the image of idle brother from their actions.
Look at Hanuman. He has never expected any greatness by doing service of Ram. He was someone with many special abilities. Still he surrendered all his abilities for the service of Ram. Same with Arjun. When he chooses Krishna he has no clue whether he will win the war or not. He doesn't blame Krishna for the death of his son Abhimanyu.
The so called Dharma becomes Adharma when you have selfishness attached. For Kaikeyi with those 2 boons she wanted to show her superiority, she wanted to get the right of Rajmata. She doesn't care the pain she is giving to many innocents who are not associated with her war at all. She is using her son as a tool to score brownie points
Shakuni the battle was always with Bhishma. He wanted the destruction of Kuruvansh to vanquish Bhishma and he used his sister, his nephews as a tool to achieve it.
Bhishma himself had his ego and his status in society to protect when he kept silent in the infamous hall of dice. Even trying to protect self image is selfishness when you are supposesd to act against adharma.
So Dharma is not dependant on people or situation. It is dependant on whether the action has selfishness or selflessness attached with it.
And it is selfishness or selflessness that varies with people or situations.
Edited by shruthiravi - 9 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".