Posted:
i suprised that the CV are rewriting the mahabharata. and karn real role in it??
maybe karn's did not entirely support duryodhan in the varnavat conspiracy, but he didn't stop it either or try to. so why are they showing karn trying to go save the pandavas????
karn was no reformer. yes karn had the ability to be a better man then any of the pandavas. and if he had found out earlier that he was a pandava too, he would have made a better king then yudhisthira, but that is besides the point.
karn only claim to history was his loyalty and generosity, his valour was tarnished the day he helped kill the sixteen year old Abhimanyu, when he and the kuru maharathi slaughtered him like a pack of wolves.
no doubt karn was a good man, a loving husband and father,a loyal friend and a braver and skilled warrior, but he was no reformer, he did not uphold dharma, or follow the path of it. it was karn warrior skills that encouraged duryodhan to commit all his atrocities.
i know that karn and krishna never met in the manner shown in the serial, where krishna tried to make him understand that a mans choices paves his path to rise or fall. i wish it had really happened. karn even though knew dharma he was not a part of it because for him being a friend to duryodhana and only duryodhana interest was his foremost dharma. and not the interest of all mankind.
karna was brave and maybe a better archer then arjun,but he choice was loyalty to duryodhana
Arjun may not have been better then karna in archery, but his choice was his unwavering Bhakti to Lord Krishna, and it was for this very reason he could never be defeated.
i only wished that the serial people do not misinterpret such an epic as the mahabharata so blatantly, karn was an anti hero, a tragic hero of the epic, he was no a hero
Music Corner
Current Affairs
Anupamaa
Udne Ki Aasha
