After Iraq invasion, Bush NEVER passed the orders to commit brutalities. It was a personal DECISION OF SOLDIERS AND OFFICERS to sadistically torture Iraqis or to shoot unarmed civilians due to fear (atleast initially in 2003-04).
OTHER ARMIES WOULDN'T have done that. Iraqis are so good natured that let alone Indian, even Pakistani, Russian or Chinese troops would have easily pacified them. US troops botched such an easy job and are now making Bush a scapegoat.
Bush's I.Q. should NOT be questioned. His ONLY problem is faulty speech. His decision making is perfect.
For instance he requested Indian troops because KASHMIR IS MILLION TIMES TOUGHER THAN IRAQ. Kashmir will remain dangerous forever but Iraq would have cooled within a week had they interacted with Indian troops. That way, so many Iraqi lives could have been saved.
Judge the average Iraqi's sincerity by the services of unsung Iraqi police during the period 2003-05. On the other hand there is something surreal about passionate Kashmir.