Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 6th Nov 2025
REPLACEMENT 6.11
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Nov 6, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
🏏Series: India tour of Australia, 2025, Aus vs India,4th T 20🏏
Ashna Kishore To Play Ranvijay’s Ex-Wife
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Nov 7, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
PARVARISSHH 7.11
Vicky & Katrina welcome BABY BOY!!
Disgusting Amaal
Was Prajit’s exit drama was staged just to save Kunika?
🥳🥳Happy Birthday Rockingsunny 🥳🥳
WT**** Mihir : Pre cap
Munni to Manjuri
Tv actors Neil Bhatt and Aishwarya Sharma file for divorce.
What if abhira gets her saas/sasur remarried
If Madhuri can get work, why can't Aishwarya?
Prediction of BB19 winner poll
Originally posted by: jaanu_me
West is not a loser. When north used the strategy juhi (host)didnt made any issues bcos it was his favourite team but when others used she made issues. When they would have taken actions regarding strategy at the first time itself such things wouldnt have been repeated again, so its their fault and not of the teams who used the strategy. When one team uses and no actions are being taken then others are also indirectly promoted for using it.
exactly! i completely agree! north were the first team to start using this strategy...but if u think of it ...north, central and west have all used this strategy once so i guess its fair now for everyone..so everyone should just smile and be happy for west who won!
i know we all have different takes on the strategies used.I personally belive that wht naveen did vs the west was not a strategy.
A bumper dhun was played and they had to recognize it.As per the rules,the moment the musician starts playing the tune the buzzer can be pressed.From the time the first chord is struck it is an open game.Whereas in wht central and west did,they pressed the buzzer before the specified time.No one was supposed to press the buzzer at that time.It was not an open game.
Secondly,if naveen wanted to use strategy in that round,he wld have prssed the buzzer as soon as the first sur was played and got -15.But he didn't do that.He waited for the first line of the song to be played..which was ard 5-6 seconds.Thus he gave equal time to his opponents too to press the buzzer.He didn't press the buzzer and say i don't know the answer(wht central and west did)..he sang the mukhda and antara...he made a few mistakes in the antara and so lost points.he probably thought he cld get the antara right.
If he hadn't recognized the song at all or had stopped with the mukhda alone,i'd say it was strategy..this was not strategy..it was normal play and a normal mistake...and if u recall....it was Juhi parmar who called it astrategy...naveen did not say or do anything to indicate it was a strategy
my personal opinion...let's not have a war over this😊
Originally posted by: rock&roll
i know we all have different takes on the strategies used.I personally belive that wht naveen did vs the west was not a strategy. A bumper dhun was played and they had to recognize it.As per the rules,the moment the musician starts playing the tune the buzzer can be pressed.From the time the first chord is struck it is an open game.Whereas in wht central and west did,they pressed the buzzer before the specified time.No one was supposed to press the buzzer at that time.It was not an open game. Secondly,if naveen wanted to use strategy in that round,he wld have prssed the buzzer as soon as the first sur was played and got -15.But he didn't do that.He waited for the first line of the song to be played..which was ard 5-6 seconds.Thus he gave equal time to his opponents too to press the buzzer.He didn't press the buzzer and say i don't know the answer(wht central and west did)..he sang the mukhda and antara...he made a few mistakes in the antara and so lost points.he probably thought he cld get the antara right. If he hadn't recognized the song at all or had stopped with the mukhda alone,i'd say it was strategy..this was not strategy..it was normal play and a normal mistake...and if u recall....it was Juhi parmar who called it astrategy...naveen did not say or do anything to indicate it was a strategy
my personal opinion...let's not have a war over this😊
Originally posted by: rock&roll
i know we all have different takes on the strategies used.I personally belive that wht naveen did vs the west was not a strategy.
A bumper dhun was played and they had to recognize it.As per the rules,the moment the musician starts playing the tune the buzzer can be pressed.From the time the first chord is struck it is an open game.Whereas in wht central and west did,they pressed the buzzer before the specified time.No one was supposed to press the buzzer at that time.It was not an open game.
Secondly,if naveen wanted to use strategy in that round,he wld have prssed the buzzer as soon as the first sur was played and got -15.But he didn't do that.He waited for the first line of the song to be played..which was ard 5-6 seconds.Thus he gave equal time to his opponents too to press the buzzer.He didn't press the buzzer and say i don't know the answer(wht central and west did)..he sang the mukhda and antara...he made a few mistakes in the antara and so lost points.he probably thought he cld get the antara right.
If he hadn't recognized the song at all or had stopped with the mukhda alone,i'd say it was strategy..this was not strategy..it was normal play and a normal mistake...and if u recall....it was Juhi parmar who called it astrategy...naveen did not say or do anything to indicate it was a strategymy personal opinion...let's not have a war over this😊
i completely agree
wht naveen used wasnt a strategy ..... if he would have pressed d buzzer jus when d song strtd widout knowing d song then that would be called strategy ......... he gave a chance to west also to press d buzzer
is it naveen's fault if he identified d tune first ...... they had to be fast
and d strategy which aastha-parag and rashmi-anuja used was completely different ..... they dint give a chance to d other teams ...... they took advantage of their high scores ..... but whts d use of winning by using a strategy ...... its not true winning ...... if d strategy they used u call its fair then plzzzz y did anuja's mom stop her from doing so .......... becuz what she was doing was wrong .... if they would have played fairly then they would have been true winners
and yeah naveen was fedup of juhi jr. she dint help him at all ..... what would one person in a team look for in his team-mate ...... equal support from his partner ..... but juhi rarely contributed to d team work ..... i really dint understand y she was crying ....... she dint sing nething ... she dint do any hardwork still she was crying .....