Created

Last reply

Replies

14

Views

1.2k

Users

10

Frequent Posters

cutestgirl_211 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#11
h3ll w3st..th3y wast3d oth3r t3am's chanc3 to gain points! hahaha..btw...have u seen naveen's anger 😃 haha..s33ms as if h3 was f3d up ov jr.juhi..who is good for nuthin..
aish* thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: jaanu_me

West is not a loser. When north used the strategy juhi (host)didnt made any issues bcos it was his favourite team but when others used she made issues. When they would have taken actions regarding strategy at the first time itself such things wouldnt have been repeated again, so its their fault and not of the teams who used the strategy. When one team uses and no actions are being taken then others are also indirectly promoted for using it.

exactly! i completely agree! north were the first team to start using this strategy...but if u think of it ...north, central and west have all used this strategy once so i guess its fair now for everyone..so everyone should just smile and be happy for west who won!

rock&roll thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#13

i know we all have different takes on the strategies used.I personally belive that wht naveen did vs the west was not a strategy.
A bumper dhun was played and they had to recognize it.As per the rules,the moment the musician starts playing the tune the buzzer can be pressed.From the time the first chord is struck it is an open game.Whereas in wht central and west did,they pressed the buzzer before the specified time.No one was supposed to press the buzzer at that time.It was not an open game.
Secondly,if naveen wanted to use strategy in that round,he wld have prssed the buzzer as soon as the first sur was played and got -15.But he didn't do that.He waited for the first line of the song to be played..which was ard 5-6 seconds.Thus he gave equal time to his opponents too to press the buzzer.He didn't press the buzzer and say i don't know the answer(wht central and west did)..he sang the mukhda and antara...he made a few mistakes in the antara and so lost points.he probably thought he cld get the antara right.
If he hadn't recognized the song at all or had stopped with the mukhda alone,i'd say it was strategy..this was not strategy..it was normal play and a normal mistake...and if u recall....it was Juhi parmar who called it astrategy...naveen did not say or do anything to indicate it was a strategy

my personal opinion...let's not have a war over this😊

Edited by rock&roll - 17 years ago
redbia thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: rock&roll

i know we all have different takes on the strategies used.I personally belive that wht naveen did vs the west was not a strategy. A bumper dhun was played and they had to recognize it.As per the rules,the moment the musician starts playing the tune the buzzer can be pressed.From the time the first chord is struck it is an open game.Whereas in wht central and west did,they pressed the buzzer before the specified time.No one was supposed to press the buzzer at that time.It was not an open game. Secondly,if naveen wanted to use strategy in that round,he wld have prssed the buzzer as soon as the first sur was played and got -15.But he didn't do that.He waited for the first line of the song to be played..which was ard 5-6 seconds.Thus he gave equal time to his opponents too to press the buzzer.He didn't press the buzzer and say i don't know the answer(wht central and west did)..he sang the mukhda and antara...he made a few mistakes in the antara and so lost points.he probably thought he cld get the antara right. If he hadn't recognized the song at all or had stopped with the mukhda alone,i'd say it was strategy..this was not strategy..it was normal play and a normal mistake...and if u recall....it was Juhi parmar who called it astrategy...naveen did not say or do anything to indicate it was a strategy


my personal opinion...let's not have a war over this😊



completely agree now i was fedup of listening that naveen used strategy. And i was going to reply with the same as you have written the thanx a lot you did it very good 👏 now i think every intelligent person must agree with it
spyrulzdworld thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: rock&roll

i know we all have different takes on the strategies used.I personally belive that wht naveen did vs the west was not a strategy.
A bumper dhun was played and they had to recognize it.As per the rules,the moment the musician starts playing the tune the buzzer can be pressed.From the time the first chord is struck it is an open game.Whereas in wht central and west did,they pressed the buzzer before the specified time.No one was supposed to press the buzzer at that time.It was not an open game.
Secondly,if naveen wanted to use strategy in that round,he wld have prssed the buzzer as soon as the first sur was played and got -15.But he didn't do that.He waited for the first line of the song to be played..which was ard 5-6 seconds.Thus he gave equal time to his opponents too to press the buzzer.He didn't press the buzzer and say i don't know the answer(wht central and west did)..he sang the mukhda and antara...he made a few mistakes in the antara and so lost points.he probably thought he cld get the antara right.
If he hadn't recognized the song at all or had stopped with the mukhda alone,i'd say it was strategy..this was not strategy..it was normal play and a normal mistake...and if u recall....it was Juhi parmar who called it astrategy...naveen did not say or do anything to indicate it was a strategy

my personal opinion...let's not have a war over this😊

i completely agree

wht naveen used wasnt a strategy ..... if he would have pressed d buzzer jus when d song strtd widout knowing d song then that would be called strategy ......... he gave a chance to west also to press d buzzer

is it naveen's fault if he identified d tune first ...... they had to be fast

and d strategy which aastha-parag and rashmi-anuja used was completely different ..... they dint give a chance to d other teams ...... they took advantage of their high scores ..... but whts d use of winning by using a strategy ...... its not true winning ...... if d strategy they used u call its fair then plzzzz y did anuja's mom stop her from doing so .......... becuz what she was doing was wrong .... if they would have played fairly then they would have been true winners

and yeah naveen was fedup of juhi jr. she dint help him at all ..... what would one person in a team look for in his team-mate ...... equal support from his partner ..... but juhi rarely contributed to d team work ..... i really dint understand y she was crying ....... she dint sing nething ... she dint do any hardwork still she was crying .....

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".