Posted:
the question is why were Hindus so servile those days? I am not condoning this gruesome act, but those days they would not have even been offended. weaklings.
Muslims are and always were hundred times more intolerant. in Kerala tons of atrocities against Hindus take place but the media does NOT report it.
in many christian colleges, Hindus are rejected just for being Hindu. in one case an examiner put his hand in a Hindu students shirt and found his holy thread and told him to stop writing the entrance exam and leave instead.
Hindus should not resort to violent crimes like in Dadri but they should start showing their muscle via the media, via the legal system, via protests.
Lately the Hinduvta ideology has been pushing the Hindus as victims idea. (It is not dissimilar to the majority White people in the US or UK claiming they are discriminated against by Black people who are essentially barred from the structures of power and influence in society.)
This gripe and constant harping on about past Muslim invaders is a peculiarly Indian mindset. The UK has been invaded repeatedly in the past by Roman, Viking, Angles, Saxons, Normans etc. These communities changed the UK quite dramatically, but you will never hear any politician or even memeber of the public decry these past invasions.
When we get down to it you and the others that think that Muslims are the problem need to be explicit and say what you propose to do about it. Tell us clearly what you would like to do to address this problem where you claim you as a majority population aer discriminated against. So what would this Hindu rule look like? How would this sit with the Indian constitution and the notion of a multi-faith society?
Anupamaa
1