Ok but for a change I am going into scholarly (not much) points.
Sutas as everytime discussed are not Sudras for god shake. Sutas were storyteller. The Mahabharata narrator Sauti is himself a Suta so how the hell he had narrated the slokas and hymns that inside mb if sutas didn't have access??
Secondly as far I know if those who don't have access on Vedas chant hymns biggest punishment of them is cutting their tongue. Means they cant talk ever but still will remain alive. And for boys punishment can be lesser like swallowing cow dung or uttering some insults (not sure) sending him in isolation and different things. Death penalty is the last punishment. If they repeat the misdeeds.
Our society is unfair and unjust as ever I know. Still they were not abnormally cruel without logic. Even in that dreaded raam and shambuka story Rama did warn Shambuka to stop chanting Vedas and when shambuka didn't stop only then Rama beheaded him. Although I don't believe that story there clearly its said in satyayuga Brahman had access to Veda only in treta both brahman and Kshatriya had in dwapar brahman Kshatriya and vaisya have access in Vedas and in kaliyuga even shudras will have.
So in that logic suta, the lower caste Kshatriya are still higherer than vaishya and shudra so they already had access in Vedas. There are only few hymns that are particular for Brahmins . Not all.
Rather women unless they are brahmabadini had no access.
Anyway sidt's atom brain cant get access on such logic.
But anyway I need to vent.
Nowadays I come i-f to only vent anyway