acting is all that should matter, but it does matter in practice. if acting is all that mattered then nassurdien shah , shanbaba azmi, manoj bajbai and MANY others would be at the top and many others like hritik roshan would be at the bottom.
hritik is actually a good example, his acting is okay, but if he didn't have muscles, he he was really skinny of chubby or ugly, he wouldn't be this big (oh and i don't hate him btw)
aishwarya rai (who i don't hate either, in fact i watch her and hritik's movies and am looking forward to jodhaa-akbar, see poster below😆) got into movie BECAUSE she was a miss world, he acting is decent but if her looks weren't there she wouldn't be in movies, (atleast not as a lead).
acting is important, but looks are equally if not more important, whether thats good or bad is up for debate. (who wants to see ugly ppl in movies all the time anyways 😆 jk.)
ps i think most celebs get atleast some work done, its WIDE spread in hollywood, i doubt its not common in bollywood. we know rakhi sawant got work done (shes the only female that i know of whose admitted it, wish i knew of a bigger star.)
salman got hair transplant or whatever its called a while back, something he openly acknowledges and is noticeable if you watch his movies. just compare partner with something from a few years ago
Edited by Singh23 - 17 years ago