Originally posted by: ticks
There was no variety in prashant's rendition. Amit's version had more harkatein and variations. I personally found Prashant's version flat and the same tune was repeated in all the song.. Why is that Prashant's version sounded a bit like Babul Supriyo or Kumar Shanu, but he put in more feel to the simple tune.. which made it appealing I think..
However, AMIT needs to sing his version in another scale I guess. AMIT ko thoda au khool ke gana hai..aur thoda aur feel dalana hai to the composition.... to bring out that khanak.. But i guess AMIT's version is tougher. he has to nail it further more. Wonder why Sony gives him tougher compositions.
Just my personal view no one has to agree.
I noticed onething..Prashant is very good at those falsettos..... Suits his voice.
i agree with u there ticks...
amits rendition was better in terms of voice throw n sur.... where he needs to improve acc to me is in his stage perf where he luks a little uncomfortable (thou he did luk more comfortable than the mumbai concert n also toward the end after he was over with his original song😉).... but im sure given tym n prac he will imprve on that 2...he has the grit n det.. n works on his weaknesses positively....
as 4 the "thoda au khool ke gana hai..aur thoda aur feel dalana hai to the composition."... i think both of them got less tym to prac the song so it affected that aspec of their singin...in it cud b seen in both their perf..
Edited by addyydda - 18 years ago