Why are these films with humongous budgets such damp squibs...?

TheekThaak thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#1
Why are these films with humongous budgets, damp squibs in terms of visuals, content and theatrical experience in general?

Ra.One, Kochadaiyaan, Bombay Velvet, I (Shankar and Vikram) and also Krrish 3, Dhoom 3, HNY to some extent. If you consider slightly older movies, we can also include Blue in the list.

I'm not really talking about the recovery as such, but reception of these movies in general. So much money is spent on these movies, yet the results are not satisfactory. People don't mention them very fondly.

Where do you think does the problem lie? In controlling the budget? Or no proper vision? Or compromising over the story-line while focussing too much on the grandeur ad gimmicks?

Movies like Mughal-e-azam ,Bahubali, Robot are exceptions though.
Edited by .krackjack. - 10 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

22

Views

1.8k

Users

16

Likes

46

Frequent Posters

MostlyHarmIess thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 10 years ago
#2
All things aside, Robot was not even a decent film in terms of visuals, content, theatrical experience by any standards what so ever
No scope for subjectivity 😛
TheekThaak thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: wAnNaBeReBel

All things aside, Robot was not even a decent film in terms of visuals, content, theatrical experience by any standards what so ever

No scope for subjectivity 😛



I personally didn't like the movie much, so I wouldn't have a problem adding it to the damp squib list, but I don't remember the wom of this film being negative. So I put it in the relatively well received films. That's it. 😆
Bazigar thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#4
instead of quality and content major part of budget , say 50% dedicated towards star's increasing fees and promotion . They overlook the basic product , content in this process, when the real product is bad than star , promotion etc. cant always help it to be successful.

TheekThaak thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: Bazigar

instead of quality and content major part of budget , say 50% dedicated towards star's increasing fees and promotion . They overlook the basic product , content in this process, when the real product is bad than star , promotion etc. cant always help it to be successful.



It's pretty sad though, such improper use of money! 😆
1047050 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#6
James Cameron is the boss of the biggest budget movies and he puts his vision in them.
BW when they make big budget films, they're usually going by a trend, put in things like "audience ko yeh acha lagega" types.

Can Bolly think of ever making a film like Mad Max fury where they talk about how more mixing of blood is needed to stave off albinism and such genetic disorders.

Can they make something like Avatar where the earth is completely destroyed in ever growing greed/consumerism and war.

Can they make interstellar where GMOs have completely decimated the bees and only food available is rotting GM corn.

saruk made ra1 because robot did well. that's not the way to sink your money. Bolly is too concerned with numbers.
DanceUntilWeDie thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
#7
Even jodha Akbar didcwell n rl n devdas
DB_reloaded thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 10 years ago
#8
the whole budget of Dhoom3 was 175cr
shot in USA aamir khan fees and delay all contributed to the increase of budget

or a film like d3 should have cost more than 110-120cr with a big star

Bang Bang budget was 170cr

it was due to faulty planning and delay they did use foreign technicians but the film shouldn't have cost more than 125-130 with HR and Katrina on board
TheekThaak thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: Live2eat

Even jodha Akbar didcwell n rl n devdas



Budgets of Jodha Akbar and Ram-Leela weren't as huge as the above mentioned movies, I guess. Devdas, probably yes.
DanceUntilWeDie thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: .krackjack.



Budgets of Jodha Akbar and Ram-Leela weren't as huge as the above mentioned movies, I guess. Devdas, probably yes.


Ashu g didn't spend a paisa on production team's food or facilities!
Isliye the film was made on a good tight budget

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 4 months ago

https://x.com/Rahulrautwrites/status/1973996737258750199

https://x.com/Rahulrautwrites/status/1973996737258750199
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: elaichichai · 1 months ago

The 3 films are -Padmaavat, Rocky Rani and Dhurandhar. Pt 2 will join as well expectedly taking it to 4 films....

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: elaichichai · 1 months ago

https://x.com/i/status/2003813373625225436

https://x.com/i/status/2003813373625225436
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: priya185 · 2 months ago

Hollywood reporter top 25 Indian films in the 21st Century...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: WhipCreamThong · 3 months ago

Yes, I am convinced. Madonna is not an actress and more a singer. But, she excelled in two period films - Dick Tracy and Evita. She was...

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".