Execution of jannat by surbhi '''

Actually I was confused that u guys didn't liked jannat or surbhi's acting, so that is why I made this poll.

In first week of Dharamsala she did best. 2nd week she was unsatisfactory .

Over acting.

Well I won't blame Surbhi here. It's all cvs fault. Except for the first scene after the accident & her memory loss in forest nothing else was there for her to do in show. They were busy to promote an amnesia victim conned by an army man using Asya bg & bringing back zoya Tanu version 2 through jannat sk. So my answer is Surbhi didn't have anything to do in this two months as jannat except for the first scene of her memory loss.

Originally posted by: Az07

Well I won't blame Surbhi here. It's all cvs fault. Except for the first scene after the accident & her memory loss in forest nothing else was there for her to do in show. They were busy to promote an amnesia victim conned by an army man using Asya bg & bringing back zoya Tanu version 2 through jannat sk. So my answer is Surbhi didn't have anything to do in this two months as jannat except for the first scene of her memory loss.

Originally posted by: JShukla

I agree here.

I feel the character was not well defined. And if the actor does not understand the character well, how will she act?

the writers wanted to bring the erstwhile Zoya-Tanveer feel(I haven't seen Season 1 but read this on forum, were they both really this childish??) and were not entirely sure of where to take the major and his victim.

Originally posted by: simran_singh_24

Whether the character is ill-defined or well defined, how the actor pulls it all thr' is what I call acting.

she just slipped in to Zoya/Sehar mode, there was no Jannat, in the bits & pieces i watched.

Considering she had played Sanam & it's Sanam who has lost her mind, Jannat should be an altogther different person.

I won't lay everything on the bg or Tanveer equation. it gave Asya feels,because she was Zoya.

I saw Jannat only in the hotel room,when she was doing the touch test.

Let them all share the credit for the fiasco that Fakeistan turned out to be.

Originally posted by: simran_singh_24

Whether the character is ill-defined or well defined, how the actor pulls it all thr' is what I call acting.

she just slipped in to Zoya/Sehar mode, there was no Jannat, in the bits & pieces i watched.

Considering she had played Sanam & it's Sanam who has lost her mind, Jannat should be an altogther different person.

I won't lay everything on the bg or Tanveer equation. it gave Asya feels,because she was Zoya.

I saw Jannat only in the hotel room,when she was doing the touch test.

Let them all share the credit for the fiasco that Fakeistan turned out to be.

Originally posted by: JShukla

I agree here.

I feel the character was not well defined. And if the actor does not understand the character well, how will she act?

the writers wanted to bring the erstwhile Zoya-Tanveer feel(I haven't seen Season 1 but read this on forum, were they both really this childish??) and were not entirely sure of where to take the major and his victim.

Originally posted by: NnonaA

Ya but I think, what if the Cvs wanted it that way, after all we don't know the whole story behind the scenes.

And yes it was more like zoya/seher, but I think Sanam was actually like that talkative, and u can cal patakha type.

And also it's very difficult to portray 4 different personalities accurately, and keep the 5th one to herself (5th one is surbhi's herself personality). I think what she did was more than enough although I do think that she could have done much better.