Roy crashes on monday - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

48

Views

6.4k

Users

28

Likes

76

Frequent Posters

briahna thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#41
lol..this was bound to happen. movie was so bad. its good to these kinda movies bomb...they deserve to bomb.
fivestars thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#42
this movie is another HAHAHA THREAD part 2 ,where ranbir fans mocked akshay 's baby.. but eventually this movie got crashed badly after first day and baby with good WOM...HAHAHAH
srkat thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#43
@BloodyHypocrite and @Shaitan-Haiwan, guys what DB_Reloaded said is absolutely true: Roy got a good opening due to Ranbir Kapoor and the music, and then the film crashed due to negative WOM. The crash has NOTHING to do with Ranbir's star power. The crash is COMPLETELY due to the negative WOM that the film is carrying.
Many people on the forum often think a film's entire lifetime collections is decided on the basis of star power only, which is not true. Starpower brings in the audience for the first day/first weekend, and then after that the film's collections depend on how much public appreciation the film has.

Films like Dhoom 3, Kick, and Happy New Year didn't get their huge lifetime collections on star power alone. Starpower contributed to some of the collections, and then public appreciation contributed to some as well.
angrybread thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#44

Originally posted by: KhanSinghTomar



It's a Ranbir movie where he is playing supporting role to Arjun Rampal. His screen time is more than 50 minutes. So, that's not a cameo.

What is praiseworthy in my view is Ranbir did it for his childhood friend (the director) so one can see his human side...nothing matters more than personal relationships...

Am i happy that he did it?- NO, these extra bucks could have been nice to have on BV opening...where every penny counts because BV needs everything to succeed...it has negative publicity going on which is never good...



So basically it's not a cameo or extended cameo as some of his fans are saying. I have heard he was on screen for 50mins and even movie name is after his character name so it will definitely be called a ranbir movie .

Doing it for friend is all fine , though i don't believe in any emotioal connections in an industry like BW, but why was he not putting any effort at all ?? from what i heard and read reviews he looked bored, disinterested and sleep walking through his role 😕 Apart from a bad script this could be another reason for it to crash . I don't know if he was doing a favour on his friend or punishing his with this acting .

As for ranbir starpower , i don't think there is anything to be happy about with the number he got considering it had good music and not so bad cast , it shows his star power reduced a lot since besharam time .Everyone knows that whatever opening numbers are for star power and then WOM so what is so special about this one that this reasoning is there in all Roy related thread.
Ela- thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#45

Originally posted by: srkat

@BloodyHypocrite and @Shaitan-Haiwan, guys what DB_Reloaded said is absolutely true: Roy got a good opening due to Ranbir Kapoor and the music, and then the film crashed due to negative WOM. The crash has NOTHING to do with Ranbir's star power. The crash is COMPLETELY due to the negative WOM that the film is carrying.

Many people on the forum often think a film's entire lifetime collections is decided on the basis of star power only, which is not true. Starpower brings in the audience for the first day/first weekend, and then after that the film's collections depend on how much public appreciation the film has.

Films like Dhoom 3, Kick, and Happy New Year didn't get their huge lifetime collections on star power alone. Starpower contributed to some of the collections, and then public appreciation contributed to some as well.




1. If the lifetime collections depend on WOM then would Baby have made the same or almost the same money if Arjun Rampal or Ayushmann Khurrana were in the lead role?

2. Does Sidharth Malhotra have the same starpower as Salman coz Ek Villain got an opening about 16 cr and Jai Ho 17 cr? Then why Hasee Toh Phasee got only 4 cr opening?



KhanSinghKumar thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#46

Originally posted by: bramcote46


So basically it's not a cameo or extended cameo as some of his fans are saying. I have heard he was on screen for 50mins and even movie name is after his character name so it will definitely be called a ranbir movie .

Doing it for friend is all fine , though i don't believe in any emotioal connections in an industry like BW, but why was he not putting any effort at all ?? from what i heard and read reviews he looked bored, disinterested and sleep walking through his role 😕 Apart from a bad script this could be another reason for it to crash . I don't know if he was doing a favour on his friend or punishing his with this acting .

As for ranbir starpower , i don't think there is anything to be happy about with the number he got considering it had good music and not so bad cast , it shows his star power reduced a lot since besharam time .Everyone knows that whatever opening numbers are for star power and then WOM so what is so special about this one that this reasoning is there in all Roy related thread.



you are right in your analysis. i am a ranbir fan and i understood what you are saying... i m not the one who bragged about ranbir starpower😊 and i am indeed worried about BV.
i am preparing to watch it but haven't been able to do so because of people saying he looked bored and expressionless...this is the 1st time Ranbir got negative reviews...probably i will just skip it
Edited by KhanSinghTomar - 11 years ago
Mehakphool thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#47
Ek villian got 16 cr opening because Aashiqui 2 was a huge success. And people wanted to see director next venture.
srkat thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#48

Originally posted by: Ela-




1. If the lifetime collections depend on WOM then would Baby have made the same or almost the same money if Arjun Rampal or Ayushmann Khurrana were in the lead role?

2. Does Sidharth Malhotra have the same starpower as Salman coz Ek Villain got an opening about 16 cr and Jai Ho 17 cr? Then why Hasee Toh Phasee got only 4 cr opening?




Read my whole post. I gave examples of how Dhoom 3, Kick, and Happy New Year got some of their lifetime collections based on their star power and then some collections based on audience appreciation. Obviously the same case applies for Baby. Baby with Arjun Rampal or Ayushmann Khurrana would have had disastrous collections.

Siddharth having same star power as Salman is a question that should not even be asked as the answer is obvious. I didn't say that star power is the ONLY contributing factor to a film's opening, although it is a big factor. Jai Ho got the opening mostly because of Salman alone, whereas Ek Villain had chartbusting music, promos that gained a lot of intrigue/attention, Siddharth/Ritesh/Shraddha, Aashiqui 2 director's next film, etc.

Promos, music, hype, release date, etc all are contributing factors to a film's opening. In the case of Roy, it was Ranbir Kapoor and the music that got the film a good opening.
Edited by srkat - 11 years ago
707763 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#49
It's weird how Ranbir fans are blaming this flop on Arjun Rampal and Jacqueline.
Why was Besharam a flop then? 😆

Why was KICK a hit ? 😳

and if a flop has to do with co-stars, then why wasn't this a flop? I see a a flop gang on the poster 😆

Edited by mainepyarkiya - 11 years ago

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: Elvis12 · 1 months ago

https://www.boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=9564

Expand â–¼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: Elvis12 · 4 months ago

https://x.com/box_off_india/status/1982783568972521832?s=46

https://x.com/box_off_india/status/1982783568972521832?s=46
Expand â–¼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: Elvis12 · 6 months ago

https://www.addatoday.com/2025/09/Baaghi-4-box-office-collection-day-2.html

Expand â–¼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: Maroonporsche · 25 days ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYeBnmwiWzA list=PLXmaHzFnQ-AT1L8O5Z1sVYaaOHzJPPobl index=1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYeBnmwiWzA
Expand â–¼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: mintyblue · 1 months ago

I first read The God of Small Things in September 2000, as a 15-year-old. Re-reading it at 40 is—inevitably—a wholly different experience. There...

Expand â–¼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".