Leave Sakshi alone for heaven's sake! - Page 3

Originally posted by: AryaDrayCoByrne

Shaurya and his friends are responsible for their actions. They should be punished as such. They are liable for the evil acts they committed and the fact they have no concept of morality makes them even more dangerous. Raj and Sakshi will choose their opponents carefully. Shaurya's lack of disregard and recklessness mean he does not think about what he is doing and its impact. He is the criminal here. His actions led to the Goenkas perverting justice. All the Goenkas should get their punishments fit for them and starting with Shaurya and his friends. Sakshi will definitely feel it if Shaurya gets eliminated.

Originally posted by: pallavi25

Sakshi did kill Rehmat Khan and supposedly his son too (she plotted to kill both and thinks the little kid died also in the fire) ...she was inhuman enough to kill a 10-11 yr old boy!

Sakshi tried to kill Bagchi and his daughter, if Durga and Akash hadnt arrived in time, both would have been burned to death.

Sakshi tried to kill Akash too but Akash killed the henchmen she had sent.

Sakshi tried to kill Raima and left her for half dead.

Rajnath killed his brother Arnab, the lawyer Agnihotri, he got Nitya's parents killed.

Both Sakshi and Rajnath are killers!

Shaurya is a rapist AND a killer who beat up the chief architect so brutally he broke his legs and landed in hospital. Shaurya tried to kill Dev too...hired a killer. Shaurya and his friends all are rapists and killers since all of them raped Payal and all plotted to kill Dev.

Sakshi is Shaurya's protector, Rajnath is his enabler. Sakshi kills and bribes to hide her son's crimes, Rajnath kills for same reason yet encourages his son to commit more crimes against women!

All 3 are horrible monsters and should be hanged by the neck till death!

As for Karan, Rishi and the other guy, these 3 shd be jailed for life.

Originally posted by: munnihyderabad

let me put my views in a generic way .

parents are responsible, even if the son is old enough to judge what is right and wrong and even then, if he chose to do wrong, the parents should reprimand him(no matter what age the son is), rather than get him out, which by a way is encouraging and supporting him in his crime.

Parents responsibility, duty and right to show the kids, the right path, at every stage,.,, Kids do turn out good or bad based on various external factors, but when he is wrong he is wrong, and just being born into an affluent family doesn't make it any less crime and that message and that teaching should be made known to the son...

supporting a crime is a bigger crime and i clearly do not see the parents doing it out of love and affection for the kid, but just to show their power and to save their reputation they targeted the victims family which is wrong.