raman's insult was too much? - Page 3

Originally posted by: The_Imane

it was just to say that ashok has nothing which is his own;

as raman said his fiancee is raman 's ex and his so called son is also raman's; so he mean go and get something new which is yours!

@bold: isn't that what shagun said to ishita?

Originally posted by: EkPaheli

Oops forgot this the child in hostel was Adi, Ashok hasnt ever said he has kids... at least so far we havent seen him have even an ex - the only woman he has been shown with is Shagun

oh ok- for some reason i thought he used two names. thanks for the clarification😊

A very interesting post Rutu😊

I must admit, I didnt give it that much thought. My thoughts wandered towards some future storyline where Ashok and Shagun may have kids (I know, dont tell me how crazy I am 😆)

So, coming to your post. I tried to be objective as much as I could while formulating this response (keeping my bias for Raman aside, and obvious dislike for Ashok too).

I think the reason that conversation happened and Raman said what he said was: Ashok has been shown to be a man who wants to 'win' the labels that Raman once had. Be it Shagun's partner or the father to Raman's kids. If Shagun had won Ruhi's custody case, Ruhi would have ended up being Ashok's 'daughter' too. And I think Raman knows very well what motivates Ashok.

In the context of the current track, what Raman was insinuating was: just by calling yourself a 'father', you dont become one. If you were really a father, you wouldnt have hurt Ruhi like this. A parent would understand the implications of hurting a child more than someone who just wants to be called a parent.

The actual words that came out of Raman's words were, yes insulting, and very similar to what Shagun says.

But the difference is not between Shagun and Raman. The difference is between the targets this line was aimed at. Ishita wants to be a parent in every sense of the word and Shagun knows it. Ashok just wants to be known as the parent and Raman knows it. And that is why I don't think Raman's line was inapproriate.

Originally posted by: rutu83

if they were to settle scores using same methods, what distinguishes hero from villain?