The Times rates OOTP 3 out of 5--article - Page 2

3/5 That was not very good.

The article said that the actors did not act as well to give the scenes the right sort of feel needed, it might be since the book was so long that some scenes which would have shown off the actors talents better, were not put in the film.

But then again it is just what they think, and everyone will feel differently about the film.


~Lady Black~

Originally posted by: Lady Black

3/5 That was not very good.

The article said that the actors did not act as well to give the scenes the right sort of feel needed, it might be since the book was so long that some scenes which would have shown off the actors talents better, were not put in the film.

But then again it is just what they think, and everyone will feel differently about the film.


~Lady Black~

ya rite.......evry1 has diffrn opinions abt evry thn......

actually the movies always deserve low marks... compared to the book the movies are like knuts to galleon

ya dats of course i srite......dey cut tooooooo many imp thngs n show silly thngs....

Originally posted by: tukz_REmix

ya dats of course i srite......dey cut tooooooo many imp thngs n show silly thngs....

...i agree with u 😊 ....i am very dissapointed that they cut out....quidditch 😭 😕 ......i really wanted to see the whole "weasly is our king" 😳 😳 ...thats was so gud 😆 ...

Well, obviously it is the critics' review, so they can't give 5/5..their jobs will be on line if they do that! 😆 😉

Those ppl will look at all the finer aspects and the minutest details of acting, direction, special effects, action, characterisation, costumes, over all plot etc..

Even if there's a cheesy scene in the movie, we fans, who are in the excited mode, will all lap it up but the critics and reviewers will point that out and take marks for that!

As for myself, OotP seems pretty awesome from the trailors...I have kept my hopes up nad am positive its going to be great, after GoF.

From the trailors, I will give it a 4/5 😉