I still do not understand how Pallavi can send a lawyer's notice saying the "property" "belongs" to the "first wife" . Where did the question of property come? Suresh Modi /Mahesh Ajmera abhi zinda hain? right? as to "illegality" that is something the court has to decide. Pallavi cannot send a "lawyer's" notice saying "Suresh Modi"''s house belongs to her.
This is Hindu marriage. and a lady has lived all her life because she was told that she was married to this man Suresh Modi. The matter should clearly go to court.And when Suresh Modi /Mahesh Ajmera is alive Pallavi cannot go around asking people to "vacate" the "house" as she is the "first wife" . There is no "first wife" there is only one wife allowed that is if they are Hindus.Now if the marriage certificate is for the marriage of Mahesh Aj"mera" and Pallavi Aj"mera" then Pallavi should go and locate Mahesh Ajmera using birth certificate identity proof etc.What kind of bakwaas are they showing.? and they go on showing more and more bakwaas.It is like some kind of "suspense" what Pallavi is going to come up with. and then it is really a stupid idiotic "court notice" which cannot even be sent.and yesterday they showed Sharda as saying Suresh Modi should worry about his own identity. Suresh or Mahesh. Why should he worry? He can only be one person with one name. He is taking the world for a ride.The cvs have to "worry" about Suresh Modi/Mahesh Ajmera's identity. and clear it soon. because it is getting stupider and stupider.More stupid is Latika saying she will not leave her "share". or "right". Clearly the law says what is legal and what is not.So why does everyone go on adding stupid ideas day by day. ?